Cited by 356Team Dynamics and PerformanceComplex Network Analysis TechniquesInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

Collaborative learning in networks

Open access
Mason, Winter, Watts, Duncan J.·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Complex problems in science, business, and engineering typically require some tradeoff between exploitation of known solutions and exploration for novel ones, where, in many cases, information about known solutions can also disseminate among individual problem solvers through formal or informal networks. Prior research on complex problem solving by collectives has found the counterintuitive result that inefficient networks, meaning networks that disseminate information relatively slowly, can perform better than efficient networks for problems that require extended exploration. In this paper, we report on a series of 256 Web-based experiments in which groups of 16 individuals collectively solved a complex problem and shared information through different communication networks. As expected, we found that collective exploration improved average success over independent exploration because good solutions could diffuse through the network. In contrast to prior work, however, we found that efficient networks outperformed inefficient networks, even in a problem space with qualitative properties thought to favor inefficient networks. We explain this result in terms of individual-level explore-exploit decisions, which we find were influenced by the network structure as well as by strategic considerations and the relative payoff between maxima. We conclude by discussing implications for real-world problem solving and possible extensions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1110069108

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A growing body of research documents a complex but persistent and critical relationship between social networks' structure and collectives' ability to collaborate, coordinate and solve problems that ultimately shape cultural repertoires.

    “A growing body of research documents a complex but persistent and critical relationship between social networks' structure and collectives' ability to collaborate, coordinate and solve problems [123][124][125] that ultimately shape cultural repertoires 74,126 .”

    From Machine culture (2023) · cites this paper as [124]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mason, W., & Watts, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
  • Yahoo! Research, New York, NY 10018
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-12-19
Volume
109
Issue
3
Pages
764-769
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2122309512
Cited by
356
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 3
FWCI
21.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Keywords
cooperative learning, complex problem solving, exploration-exploitation balance, information dissemination, network structure, collective intelligence, strategic behavior, payoff structure, group problem solving
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Learning, Male, Social Support, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review