The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Imitation of Complex Strategies
Abstract
Researchers examining loosely coupled systems, knowledge management, and complementary practices in organizations have proposed, informally, that the complexity of a successful business strategy can deter imitation of the strategy. This paper explores this proposition rigorously. A simple model is developed that parametrizes the two aspects of strategic complexity: the number of elements in a strategy and the interactions among those elements. The model excludes conventional resource-based and game-theoretic barriers to imitation altogether. The model is used to show that complexity makes the search for an optimal strategy intractable in the technical sense of the word provided by the theory of NP-completeness. Consequently, would-be copycats must rely on search heuristics or on learning, not on algorithmic “solutions,” to match the performance of superior firms. However, complexity also undermines heuristics and learning. In the face of complexity, firms that follow simple hill-climbing heuristics are quickly snared on low “local peaks,” and firms that try to learn and mimic a high performer's entire strategy suffer large penalties from small errors. The model helps to explain why some winning strategies remain unmatched even though they are open to public scrutiny; why certain bundles of organizational practices diffuse slowly even though they lead to superior performance; and why some strategies yield superior returns even after many of their critical ingredients are adopted by competitors. The analysis also suggests roles for management science and managerial choice in a world of complex strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
Cited by
The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984 · Cited by 4,104
A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations
Fiss, P. C. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586092 · Cited by 2,225
Does Management Matter? Evidence from India *
Bloom, N., Eifert, B., Mahajan, A., McKenzie, D., & Roberts, J. (2013) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjs044 · Cited by 1,418
Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data
Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2001) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00135-9 · Cited by 1,315
Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design
Rivkin, J. W., & Siggelkow, N. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.3.290.12740 · Cited by 900
Self-citationCapturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing
Furnari, S., Crilly, D., Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Fiss, P. C., & Aguilera, R. V. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0298 · Cited by 861
Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules
Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2009) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2009.54.3.413 · Cited by 804
“Thus our study follows a long, infl uential tradition of simple yet powerful computational models that rely on rules to represent structure (Nelson and Winter, 1982; March, 1991; Rivkin, 2000).”
BackgroundMethodThe Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation
Lazer, D., & Friedman, A. (2007) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.52.4.667 · Cited by 696
Siggelkow, N., & Levinthal, D. A. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.6.650.24870 · Cited by 953
Ecosystems: broadening the locus of value creation
Kapoor, R. (2018) · Journal of Organization Design · doi:10.1186/s41469-018-0035-4 · Cited by 504
Kapoor, R., & Agarwal, S. (2017) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1122 · Cited by 453
Collaborative learning in networks
Mason, W., & Watts, D. J. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1110069108 · Cited by 356
Learning while (re)configuring: Business model innovation processes in established firms
Berends, H., Smits, A., Reymen, I., & Podoynitsyna, K. (2016) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127016632758 · Cited by 274
Heuristics as adaptive decision strategies in management: HEURISTICS IN MANAGEMENT
Artinger, F., Petersen, M., Gigerenzer, G., & Weibler, J. (2015) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1950 · Cited by 255
Hierarchical Structure and Search in Complex Organizations
Mihm, J., Loch, C. H., Wilkinson, D., & Huberman, B. A. (2010) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1100.1148 · Cited by 154
Reconsideration of the Winner-Take-All Hypothesis: Complex Networks and Local Bias
Lee, E., Lee, J., & Lee, J. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0571 · Cited by 157
From product system to ecosystem: How firms adapt to provide an integrated value proposition
Stonig, J., Schmid, T., & Müller‐Stewens, G. (2022) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3390 · Cited by 150
Zhao, Z. J., & Anand, J. (2013) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2080 · Cited by 144
Social learning strategies modify the effect of network structure on group performance
Barkoczi, D., & Galesic, M. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13109 · Cited by 131
Economic Opportunity and Evolution: Beyond Landscapes and Bounded Rationality
Felin, T., Kauffman, S., Koppl, R., & Longo, G. (2014) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1184 · Cited by 140
Knowledge Creation and Organizational Capabilities of Innovating and Imitating Firms
Lewin, A. Y., & Massini, S. (2004) · Organizations as Knowledge Systems · doi:10.1057/9780230524545_10 · Cited by 108
Agarwal, S., & Kapoor, R. (2023) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2022.1615 · Cited by 105
NK model as a representation of innovative search
Ganco, M. (2017) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.009 · Cited by 83
Knowledge complexity and the performance of inter‐unit knowledge replication structures
Kim, S., & Anand, J. (. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2899 · Cited by 66
Brunswicker, S., Almirall, E., & Majchrzak, A. (2019) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2019/13561 · Cited by 59
Search on Rugged Landscapes: An Experimental Study
Billinger, S., Stieglitz, N., & Schumacher, T. R. (2010) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1711743 · Cited by 54
Zhang, H. (2022) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2022.100192 · Cited by 40
Asymmetric modeling of organizational innovation
Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., & Arribas, I. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.04.005 · Cited by 36
Disruptive evolution: harnessing functional excess, experimentation, and science as tool
Felin, T., & Kauffman, S. (2023) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtad057 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Rivkin, J. W.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 824-844
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2160117959
- Cited by
- 1,283
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 59.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.