Cited by 144Innovation and Knowledge ManagementKnowledge Management and SharingManagement and Organizational Studies

Beyond boundary spanners: The ‘collective bridge’ as an efficient interunit structure for transferring collective knowledge

Zhao, Zheng Jane, Anand, Jaideep·2013·Strategic Management Journal

Abstract

This research introduces a framework for selecting efficient interunit structures in facilitating the transfer of knowledge with different levels of complexity. We argue that while the boundary spanner structure is efficient for transferring discrete knowledge, it is inadequate for transferring collectively held complex knowledge. We propose that the transfer of such knowledge requires a more decentralized interunit structure—collective bridge, which is a set of direct interunit ties connecting the members of the source and the recipient units, with the configuration of the interunit ties matching the complexity of knowledge to be transferred. We suggest that while a collective bridge is inefficient in transferring discrete knowledge relative to a boundary spanner structure, it is more efficient for transferring collective knowledge . Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smj.2080

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In order to link into new flows of knowledge, firms need to restructure their existing practices and upgrade their absorptive capacities in response to new technologies and standards.

    “In order to link into new flows of knowledge, they need to restructure their existing practices and upgrade their absorptive capacities in response to new technologies and standards”
  • When MNEs and local firms engage with each other, absorptive capacity is not limited to their existing cognition and structures but also to the complex interconnectedness that arises within the entire ecosystem because of their collaboration.

    “Therefore, when MNEs and local firms engage with each other, absorptive capacity is not limited to their existing cognition and structures but also to the complex interconnectedness that arises within the entire ecosystem because of their collaboration”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 10.2307/257575 · DOI
  2. 10.1366/000370258774615410 · DOI
  3. Simonin B, 1991, Business Admininstration, Business School

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, Z. J., & Anand, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Zheng Jane
Venue
Strategic Management Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-04
Volume
34
Issue
13
Pages
1513-1530
ISSN
  • 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0266
OpenAlex
W1591766376
Cited by
144
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
27.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
boundary spanners, knowledge transfer, collective knowledge, complex knowledge, interorganizational networks, network structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review