The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory
Abstract
Rising levels of advertising competition have made it increasingly difficult to attract and hold consumers' attention and to establish strong memory traces for the advertised brand. A common communication strategy to break through this competitive clutter is to increase ad originality. However, ad originality may have detrimental effects when consumers pay more attention to the ad at the expense of the advertised brand. Moreover, the positive effects of originality may quickly wane when the ad becomes familiar. Surprisingly, no research to date has examined such brand attention and memory effects of ad originality and familiarity. The current study aims to fill this void. We use a stochastic model of the influence that ad originality and familiarity have on consumers' eye fixations to the key elements of advertisements—brand, text, and pictorial—and how the information extracted during eye fixations promotes memory for the advertised brand. The model explicitly accounts for heterogeneity due to consumers and advertisements. Infrared eye tracking was applied to collect eye fixation data from 119 consumers who paged through two general-audience magazines containing 58 full-page advertisements. Memory for the advertised brands was assessed with an indirect memory task. The model was estimated using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. In support of our hypotheses, original advertisements drew more attention to the advertised brand. More importantly however, advertisements that were both original and familiar attracted the largest amount of attention to the advertised brand, which improved subsequent brand memory. In addition, original and familiar ads were found to promote brand memory directly. Implications of these findings for communication and media planning strategy are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research
Rayner, K. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 · Cited by 7,979
The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization.
Amabile, T. M. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357 · Cited by 4,034
Visual attention during brand choice: The impact of time pressure and task motivation
Pieters, R., & Warlop, L. (1999) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/s0167-8116(98)00022-6 · Cited by 603
Self-citation
Cited by
Colour appeal in website design within and across cultures: A multi-method evaluation
Cyr, D., Head, M., & Larios, H. (2010) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.005 · Cited by 511
Akpinar, E., & Berger, J. (2017) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0350 · Cited by 267
Large Language Model in Creative Work: The Role of Collaboration Modality and User Expertise
Chen, Z., & Chan, J. (2024) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.03014 · Cited by 204
Obesity and the Built Environment: Changes in Environmental Cues Cause Energy Imbalances
Cohen, D. A. (2008) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2008.250 · Cited by 187
Meißner, M., & Oll, J. (2019) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428117744882 · Cited by 131
Grigaliunaite, V., & Pileliene, L. (2016) · Scientific Annals of Economics and Business · doi:10.1515/saeb-2016-0130 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Pieters, R., Warlop, L., & Wedel, M.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 765-781
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2098804822
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.