Cited by 511Color perception and designUsability and User Interface DesignInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Colour appeal in website design within and across cultures: A multi-method evaluation

Cyr, Dianne, Head, Milena, Larios, Hector·2010·International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.005

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cyr, D., Head, M., & Larios, H.
Affiliations
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Cyr, Dianne
Venue
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
68
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-21
ISSN
1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000141706
Cited by
511
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 26
FWCI
20.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Color perception and design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
color psychology, cross-cultural comparison, user trust, user satisfaction, e-loyalty, eye tracking, web design, web marketing, interface design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review