The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Who's Really Sharing? Effects of Social and Expert Status on Knowledge Exchange Within Groups
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of social status and perceived expertise on the emphasis of unique and shared knowledge within functionally heterogeneous groups. While perceived expertise did not increase the individual's emphasis of their own unique knowledge, perceived experts were more likely than nonexperts to emphasize shared knowledge and other member's unique knowledge contributions. Additionally, socially isolated members participated more in discussions and emphasized more of their unique knowledge than did socially connected members. While unique knowledge contributions increased the positive perception of social isolates, similar unique knowledge contributions decreased the positive perception of socially connected members. Finally, socially connected group members gave greater attention to the unique knowledge contributions of the socially isolated member than to the contributions of their socially connected other, but more favorably evaluated members to whom they were more favorably connected than those to whom they were not. We discuss the implications of our findings for managing knowledge exchange within diverse groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2893 · Cited by 4,164
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467 · Cited by 1,850
Kilduff, M., & Krackhardt, D. (1994) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256771 · Cited by 689
Communication, Learning, and Retrieval in Transactive Memory Systems
Hollingshead, A. B. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1358 · Cited by 471
Stasser, G., Vaughan, S. I., & Stewart, D. D. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2890 · Cited by 275
Ingroup bias as a function of task characteristics
Brewer, M. B., & Silver, M. (1978) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420080312 · Cited by 268
‘Social Sharedness’ as a Unifying Theme for Information Processing in Groups
Tindale, R. S., & Kameda, T. (2000) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430200003002002 · Cited by 225
Cited by
What Differences Make a Difference?: The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations
Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x · Cited by 1,276
Self-citationCollaborative Brokerage, Generative Creativity, and Creative Success
Fleming, L., Mingo, S., & Chen, D. (2007) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.52.3.443 · Cited by 1,252
Ma, M., & Agarwal, R. (2007) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0113 · Cited by 1,143
Small Worlds and Regional Innovation
Fleming, L., King, C., & Juda, A. I. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0289 · Cited by 659
Knowledge transfer in organizations: The roles of members, tasks, tools, and networks
Argote, L., & Fahrenkopf, E. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.08.003 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas-Hunt, M. C., Ogden, T. Y., & Neale, M. A.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 464-477
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2108267847
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 74.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Who's Really Sharing? Effects of Social and Expert Status on Knowledge Exchange Within Groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.464.14425
- The paper
- Thomas-Hunt, M. C., Ogden, T. Y., & Neale, M. A. (2003). Who's Really Sharing? Effects of Social and Expert Status on Knowledge Exchange Within Groups. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.464.14425
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
