Cited by 275Team Dynamics and PerformanceSocial and Intergroup PsychologyMemory Processes and Influences

Pooling unshared information: the benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among group members.

Stasser, Garold, Vaughan, Sandra I, Stewart, Dennis D·2000·Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/obhd.2000.2890

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pre-deliberation and pre-discussion distribution of decision-relevant information has a strong influence on the content of intragroup and group attitudes, and significantly affects individual as well as collective reasoning.

    “Again, the pre-deliberation and pre-discussion distribution of decision-relevant information has a strong influence on the content of intragroup and group attitudes, and this significantly affects individual as well as collective reasoning.”
  • There is a strong tendency, especially in smaller face-to-face discussion groups, to focus on already shared or commonly known and available information, while not taking into account unshared, though maybe highly relevant, information.

    “There is a strong tendency, especially in smaller face-to-face discussion groups, to focus on already shared or commonly known and available information, while not taking into account unshared, though maybe highly relevant, information.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stasser, G., Vaughan, S. I., & Stewart, D. D.
Affiliations
  • Miami University (US)
  • Benedictine University (US)
Venue
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-05
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
102-116
ISSN
0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118631553
Cited by
275
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 29
FWCI
16.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
group decision making, information pooling, role enactment, sampling bias, division of labor, group discussion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review