The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort, and Performance
Abstract
The notion of integration is central to the understanding of organizations in general as well as of contemporary phenomena such as e-commerce, virtual organizations, virtual teams, and enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation. Yet, the concept of integration is ill-defined in the literature, and the impact of achieving high levels of integration is not well understood. The present paper addresses these issues. Drawing on the literature of several fields, this paper proposes the concept of organizational integration (OI), which is defined as the extent to which distinct and interdependent organizational components constitute a unified whole. Six types of OI are identified: two intraorganizational OI (internal-operational, internal-functional) and four interorganizational OI (external-operational-forward, external-operational-backward, external-operational-lateral, and external-functional). This paper then presents a model and develops 14 propositions to predict (1) the effort needed to implement different types of OI, (2) the impact different types of OI will have on organizational performance, and (3) how six factors (interdependence, barriers to OI, mechanisms for achieving OI, environmental turbulence, complexity reduction mechanisms, and organizational configurations) influence the relationship between OI types, implementation effort, and organizational performance. The OI framework and model are then used to develop 14 propositions for ERP implementation research and to explain the findings of recent research on integration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809 · cited 3×
“As such, characteristics of the knowledge residing in each unit, including its codifiability (Hansen 1999), observability and embeddedness (Birkinshaw et al.”
BackgroundGrant, R. M. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375 · Cited by 5,649
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations
Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. (1994) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/196734.196745 · Cited by 1,736
Investment in Enterprise Resource Planning: Business Impact and Productivity Measures
Hitt, L. M., Wu, D. J., & Zhou, X. (2002) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045716 · Cited by 877 · cited 3×
“ERP implementation and organizational performance (Hitt et al. 2002), studies have yet to examine ERP implementations in an integrative way by linking them to implementation effort and organizational performance.”
BackgroundResult
Research works printed but not linked: 79
- 10.1287/orsc.10.1.43 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00959.x · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.13.3.274.2778 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/amr.1981.4287985 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/256301 · DOI · Paper page
- Brown J. S., 2002, The McKinsey Quart., 2, 58
- Brown L. D., 1978, Advances in Experimental Social Process, 1, 161
- 10.1287/orsc.10.1.69 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0164-1212(01)00008-5 · DOI
- 10.1287/isre.8.2.125 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/EUM0000000005578 · DOI
- Chiang R. H. L., 2000, Data Base, 31, 46
- 10.1080/07421222.1990.11517871 · DOI
- 10.1016/0737-6782(86)90030-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1147/sj.401.0068 · DOI
- 10.2307/256389 · DOI · Paper page
- Dearden J., 1972, Harvard Bus. Rev., 50, 101
- Dosi G., 1988, J. Econom. Literature, 26, 1120
- 10.1287/orsc.3.2.179 · DOI · Paper page
- Ettlie J. E., 1988, Taking Charge of Manufacturing
- 10.2307/256316 · DOI · Paper page
- Fayol H., 1949, General and Industrial Management
- Florida R., 1990, The Breakthrough Illusion: Corporate America’s Failure to Move from Innovation to Mass Production
- Galbraith J. R., 1977, Organization Design
- 10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00082-X · DOI
- 10.1097/00004010-200101000-00007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/249530 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2392247 · DOI · Paper page
- Gunn T. G., 1987, Manufacturing for Competitive Advantage: Becoming a World Class Manufacturer
- 10.1016/0923-4748(93)90062-N · DOI
- Homer-Dixon T. F., 2001, The Ingenuity Gap
- 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000402 · DOI
- 10.1109/TEM.2002.808297 · DOI
- 10.1080/07421222.1994.11518020 · DOI
- 10.2307/257028 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1026543906354 · DOI · Paper page
- Lawrence P., 1969, Organization and Environment
- Leavitt H. J., 1971, Management and Motivation
- 10.1287/opre.41.5.835 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/214762.214766 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.45.3.425 · DOI · Paper page
- Markus L. M., 2001, Bus. Process Management J., 7, 1
- 10.2307/2392528 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/001872679004300805 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.1993.3997509 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/255551 · DOI
- 10.2307/256632 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/014920639602200604 · DOI
- Mintzberg H., 1973, The Nature of Managerial Work
- Mintzberg H., 1979, The Structure of Organizations
- 10.1287/mnsc.48.10.1301.273 · DOI
- Nelson R. R., 1986, Frontiers in Innovation Diffusion
- 10.1016/S1471-7727(02)00007-6 · DOI
- Orlicky J. A., 1975, Material Requirements Planning; the New Way of Life in Production and Inventory Management
- 10.5465/amr.1990.4308154 · DOI
- Perrow C., 1970, Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View
- 10.2307/249772 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.43.5.659 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.13.2.191.537 · DOI
- Polanyi K., 1957, Trade and Market in the Early Empires
- Porter M. E., 1985, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance
- Porter M. E., 2001, Harvard Bus. Rev., 79, 63
- 10.2307/2096445 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-8551.00085 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.12.2.179.10113 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00213624.2000.11506245 · DOI
- Schein E., 1985, Organizational Culture and Leadership
- 10.1023/A:1026504325010 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.40.10.1291 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01134.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01972243.1992.9960119 · DOI
- Thompson J. D., 1967, Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory
- 10.1080/07421222.2000.11045630 · DOI
- Tushman M. L., 1985, Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 171
- Venkatraman N., 1991, Sloan Management Rev., 32, 33
- 10.1287/isre.1.4.377 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.1987.4306563 · DOI
- Weill P., 2002, MIS Quart. Executive, 1, 17
- Williamson O. E., 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism
Cited by
Tallon, P. P., & Pinsonneault, A. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23044052 · Cited by 1,187
Self-citationA multi-project model of key factors affecting organizational benefits from enterprise systems
(2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.5555/2017458.2017464 · Cited by 259
A Multi-Project Model of Key Factors Affecting Organizational Benefits from Enterprise Systems1
Seddon, P. B., Calvert, C., & Yang, S. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721429 · Cited by 211
Narayanan, S., Jayaraman, V., Luo, Y., & Swaminathan, J. M. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.05.001 · Cited by 202
Beyond the organizational ‘container’: Conceptualizing 21st century sociotechnical work
Winter, S., Berente, N., Howison, J., & Butler, B. (2014) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.10.003 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Barki, H., & Pinsonneault, A.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 165-179
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2104132592
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 36.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort, and Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/orsc.1050.0118
- The paper
- Barki, H., & Pinsonneault, A. (2005). A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort, and Performance. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0118
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.