Cited by 95Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsWorkplace Health and Well-beingStress and Burnout Research

Psychological flexibility and mindfulness as predictors of individual outcomes in hospital health workers.

Open access
Ramaci, Tiziana, Bellini, Diego, Presti, Giovambattista, Santisi, Giuseppe·2019·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Research in organizational psychology emphasizes the idea that wellbeing and productivity outcomes are influenced both by individual differences (traits, values) and work environment characteristics (relationships, climate). Evidence for the effectiveness of psychological interventions for stress is currently unclear. To date, research on psychological flexibility in workplaces has not been systematically conducted in Italy. We investigated its relevance in the context of the Italian health care system. In this study, the relationship between sources of stress at work and its outcomes in terms of psychological and physical health are explored. Furthermore, the moderating effect of psychological flexibility and mindfulness on psychological and physical health are investigated. Four hundred and eleven health workers of a Sicilian hospital with different job positions were recruited, of which 42.7% were males (N= 169) and 57.3% were females (N=227). Their ages ranged between 25 and 72 years (M=49.16; SD=8.65). Participants answered a questionnaire that assessed psychological flexibility, mindfulness, sources of stress at work and health benefits. In a bivariate analysis, managerial factors, relationships, and intrinsic factors are partially negatively related to psychological and physical health; whereas, multivariate analyses show that psychological flexibility does not moderate the relationship between psychological and physical health. Instead, mindfulness is strongly and consistently correlated to psychological and physical health. Employees who show psychological flexibility, are more likely to show greater openness to the acceptance of setbacks in the working environment and to carry on their valued living and working path. This seems to correlate positively on individual wellbeing. Data show that a flexible and mindful attitude towards difficult psychological events aids responsiveness to changes and the ability to work more effectively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01302

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bond F. W. Flaxman P. E. Lloyd J. (2016). Mindfulness and meditation in the workplace: An acceptance and commitment therapy approach. in The Psychology of Meditation, Research and Practice, ed. West M A. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  2. Bond F. W. Hayes S. C. (2002). ACT at work. in Handbook of Brief Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, eds Bond F. W. Dryden W. (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley).
  3. Cooper C. L. Sloan S. J. Williams S. (1988a). OSI: Occupational Stress Indicator Windsor: NFER Nelson. 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1976.tb00325.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Magnano P. Platania S. Ramaci T. Santisi G. Di Nuovo S. (2017). Validation of the italian version of the mindfulness organizing scale (MOS) in organizational contexts. Test. Psychometr. Methodol. Appl. Psychol. 24 45– 64. 10.4473/TPM24.1.3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramaci, T., Bellini, D., Presti, G., & Santisi, G.
Affiliations
  • Università degli Studi di Enna Kore (IT)
  • University of Cagliari (IT)
  • University of Catania (IT)
Corresponding author
Ramaci, Tiziana
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2019-06-12
Volume
10
Pages
1302-1302
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2945666641
Cited by
95
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
12.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Università degli Studi di Enna Kore
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
psychological flexibility, mindfulness, occupational stress, healthcare workers, hospital staff, mental health, physical health, employee well-being, moderating effect, Italian healthcare system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review