The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Different Roles, Different Strokes: Organizing Virtual Customer Environments to Promote Two Types of Customer Contributions
Abstract
In recent years, many companies have established virtual customer environments (VCEs) that offer facilities ranging from online discussion forums to virtual product design centers to partner with their customers in product development and product support activities. In this study, we focus on one form of VCE, online customer forums, and propose that the relevance of four distinct theoretical perspectives—social capital theory, social exchange theory, involvement, and social identity theory—to explaining customer participation will be contingent on the nature of the customer contribution context, that is, whether the contributions are to the customer community (through product support) or to the company (through product ideation). We propose a model suggesting that customers' prosocial behavior and expectations of private rewards will shape contributions to the community, whereas their perceived innovation partnership with the company and expectations of private rewards will shape a contribution to the company. We also contend that these effects will be moderated by customers' identification with the community and with the company. Our empirical findings offer support for the model and indicate that online customer forums (and more broadly VCEs) should be tailored to fit the nature of customer contribution sought. Implications for research and practice in customer co-innovation, online peer-to-peer communities, and customer relationship management are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital
Putnam, R. D. (1995) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002 · Cited by 14,037
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259373 · Cited by 7,111
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018 · Cited by 6,479
Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction
WALTHER, J. B. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023001001 · Cited by 4,798
Muniz, A. M., & O'Guinn, T. C. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/319618 · Cited by 3,998
Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258850 · Cited by 3,777
Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation
Sawhney, M., Verona, G., & Prandelli, E. (2005) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20046 · Cited by 1,406
Cited by
The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes
Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018 · Cited by 3,089
Self-citationCustomer participation and value creation: a systematic review and research implications
Mustak, M., Jaakkola, E., & Halinen, A. (2013) · Managing Service Quality: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/msq-03-2013-0046 · Cited by 302
The influence of user affect in online information disclosure
Wakefield, R. (2013) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2013.01.003 · Cited by 172
Huang, P., Tafti, A., & Mithas, S. (2018) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2018/13490 · Cited by 133
Motivational Drivers of Content Contribution to Company‐ Versus Consumer‐Hosted Online Communities
Teichmann, K., Stokburger‐Sauer, N. E., Plank, A., & Strobl, A. (2015) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20783 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 554-572
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2159347390
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 29.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Different Roles, Different Strokes: Organizing Virtual Customer Environments to Promote Two Types of Customer Contributions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/orsc.1090.0460
- The paper
- Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2010). Different Roles, Different Strokes: Organizing Virtual Customer Environments to Promote Two Types of Customer Contributions. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0460
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.