The DOI matches its Crossref record; 123 of the 126 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations
Abstract
As both technologies and organizations undergo dramatic changes in form and function, organizational researchers are increasingly turning to concepts of innovation, emergence, and improvisation to help explain the new ways of organizing and using technology evident in practice. With a similar intent, I propose an extension to the structurational perspective on technology that develops a practice lens to examine how people, as they interact with a technology in their ongoing practices, enact structures which shape their emergent and situated use of that technology. Viewing the use of technology as a process of enactment enables a deeper understanding of the constitutive role of social practices in the ongoing use and change of technologies in the workplace. After developing this lens, I offer an example of its use in research, and then suggest some implications for the study of technology in organizations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some employees may react favorably to these changes, while the others may perceive these changes as a threat to their well-being (Orlikowski, 2000;Boudreau & Robey, 2005).”
From Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions (2008) · cites this paper as Orlikowski, 2000
In the citing paper
“Therefore, instead of conceptualizing opacity as inherent or fixed features of AI tools, we view opacity as something produced and enacted through practices situated in specific organizational configurations (Leonardi 2011, Orlikowski 2000).”
From To Engage or Not to Engage with AI for Critical Judgments: How Professionals Deal with Opacity When Using AI for Medical Diagnosis (2022) · cites this paper as Orlikowski 2000
In the citing paper
“That is, people are an essential part of the information system, and business benefits are not produced by the technology alone (Orlikowski, 2000).”
From An Explanatory Framework for Achieving Business Benefits from ERP Systems (2012) · cites this paper as Orlikowski, 2000
In the citing paper
“They interpret their actions in order to make sense of what they are doing and, though their choices of how to proceed appear automatic or mindless at times, there is always the possibility of resisting expectations and doing otherwise (Giddens, 1984; Orlikowski, 2000).”
From Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change (2003) · cites this paper as Orlikowski, 2000
In the citing paper
“From this perspective, non- or partial adoption, mis-use, non-use and workarounds, are not simply negative effects, pathologies or signs of failure, but are different enactments of the ‘technology-in-use’ [58,79].”
Citations
Cites
Outline of a Theory of Practice
Bourdieu, P. (1977) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812507 · Cited by 27,606
(1984) · Cited by 21,166
Gioia, D. A., Mehra, A., & Weick, K. E. (1996) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259169 · Cited by 15,616
Outline of a Theory of Practice.
Frank, A. W., & Bourdieu, P. (1980) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2066038 · Cited by 14,591
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801
(1969) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 10,735
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.40 · Cited by 8,742
Central Problems in Social Theory
Giddens, A. (1979) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4 · Cited by 8,061
Braverman, H. (1974) · Monthly Review · doi:10.14452/mr-026-03-1974-07_1 · Cited by 5,505
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Barley S. R., 1988, Res. Soc. Organ., 6, 33
- Bazerman C., 1994, Genre and the New Rhetoric, 79
- Bijker W. E., 1987, The Social Construction of Technological Systems
- Bijker W. E., 1992, Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change
- 10.2307/255924 · DOI
- Ciborra C. U., 1996, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Information Systems, 369
- DeJean D., 1991, Lotus Notes at Work
- Greif I., 1988, Computer Supported Cooperative Work
- Grudin J., 1989, Office: Tech. and People, 4, 245
- Hedberg B., 1997, Virtual Organizations and Beyond
- Iacono S., IT and Organizational Transformation: History, Rhetoric, and Practice
- Lant T., 1999, Advances in Management Cognition and Organizational Information Processing, 6, 171
- Latour B., 1992, Shaping Technology/ Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, 225
- Marx L., 1994, Does Technology Drive History?
- 10.2307/256817 · DOI
- Tenkasi R. V., 1993, Res. in Organ. Change and Development, 7, 77
- Walsham G., 1991, J. Appl. Systems Anal., 17, 77
- Weick K., 1990, Technology and Organizations, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Design Science in Information Systems Research1
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148625 · Cited by 10,707
Design science in information systems research
(2004) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.5555/2017212.2017217 · Cited by 8,254
Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x · Cited by 8,159
Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556620 · Cited by 4,020
Institutions and Institutional Work
Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006) · The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies · doi:10.4135/9781848608030.n7 · Cited by 3,338
Metadata
- Authors
- Orlikowski, W. J.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Orlikowski, Wanda J.
- ORCID
- Orlikowski, Wanda J.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 404-428
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W1996293917
- Cited by
- 4,760
- References
- 126
- Citations by year
- 2026: 251 · 2025: 197 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 192 · 2022: 151 · 2021: 191 · 2020: 220 · 2019: 208 · 2018: 173 · 2017: 151 · 2016: 192 · 2015: 240 · 2014: 289 · 2013: 270 · 2012: 262
- FWCI
- 160.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Keywords
- technology in organizations, enactment, social practices, improvisation, innovation, situated practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
