The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Nontraditional Quality of Organizational Learning
Abstract
The traditional definition of learning as a shift in performance when the stimulus situation remains essentially the same implies a set of conditions that occur rarely in organizations. Thus, either organizational learning is an infrequent event, or it occurs frequently but takes a nontraditional form. Both possibilities are reviewed and implications for research strategy are suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241
Cited by
SECI, Ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/s0024-6301(99)00115-6 · Cited by 4,135
Making public health programs last: conceptualizing sustainability
Pluye, P., Potvin, L., & Denis, J.-L. (2004) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.01.001 · Cited by 374
The Social Construction of Organizational Learning: Conceptual and Practical Issues in the Field
Nicolini, D., & Meznar, M. B. (1995) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679504800701 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Weick, K. E.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 1991-02
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 116-124
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2069705035
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
