Accounting for the Gap: A Firm Study Manipulating Organizational Accountability and Transparency in Pay Decisions
Abstract
Great progress has been made in documenting how employer practices may shape workplace inequality. Less research attention, however, has been given to investigating which organizational strategies are effective at addressing gender and racial inequality in labor markets. Using a unique field study design, this article identifies and tests, for the first time, whether accountability and transparency in pay decisions—two popular organizational initiatives discussed among scholars and practitioners—may reduce the pay gap by employee gender, race, and foreign nationality. Through a longitudinal analysis of a large private company, I study the performance-based reward decisions concerning almost 9,000 employees before and after high-level management adopted a set of organizational procedures, introducing accountability and transparency into the company’s performance-reward system. Before such procedures were introduced, there was an observed gap in the distribution of performance-based rewards where women, ethnic minorities, and non-U.S.-born employees received lower monetary rewards compared with U.S.-born white men having the same performance evaluation scores and working in the same job and work unit with the same manager and the same human capital characteristics. Analyses of the company’s employee performance-reward data after the adoption of accountability and transparency procedures show a reduction in this pay gap. I conclude by discussing the implications of this study for future research about employer strategies targeting workplace inequality and diversity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transparency in the racial composition of employees and managers may be an important tool to help control discrimination in hiring.
“Just as the literature suggests salary transparency is a factor that can help control inequalities in earnings (e.g., Castilla 2015), transparency in the racial composition of employees and managers may be an important tool to help control discrimination in hiring.”
From Comparative Perspectives on Racial Discrimination in Hiring: The Rise of Field Experiments (2021) · cites this paper as Castilla 2015
Cites
Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework <sup>1</sup>
Bovens, M. (2007) · European Law Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x · Cited by 2,667 · see citing works
Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240607100404 · Cited by 2,052 · see citing works
Accountability and the Perseverance of First Impressions
Tetlock, P. E. (1983) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3033716 · Cited by 513 · see citing works
Second generation employment discrimination: a structural approach
Sturm, S. (2001) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1123737 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Multi-Level Process Model for Understanding Diversity Practice Effectiveness
Nishii, L. H., Khattab, J., Shemla, M., & Paluch, R. M. (2018) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0044 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Comparative Perspectives on Racial Discrimination in Hiring: The Rise of Field Experiments
Quillian, L., & Midtbøen, A. H. (2021) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-090420-035144 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Adopting an anti-racism public health curriculum competency: the university of Washington experience
Hagopian, A., West, K. M., Ornelas, I. J., Hart, A. N., Hagedorn, J., & Spigner, C. (2018) · Public Health Reports® · doi:10.1177/0033354918774791 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
- Authors
- Castilla, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Castilla, Emilio J.
- ORCID
- Castilla, Emilio J.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 311-333
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2112689551
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 22.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Keywords
- wage gap, organizational accountability, transparency, performance-based rewards, gender inequality, racial inequality, workplace inequality, diversity management, field experiments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review