Cited by 255Gender Diversity and InequalityNames, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchLabor market dynamics and wage inequality

Accounting for the Gap: A Firm Study Manipulating Organizational Accountability and Transparency in Pay Decisions

Castilla, Emilio J.·2015·Organization Science

Abstract

Great progress has been made in documenting how employer practices may shape workplace inequality. Less research attention, however, has been given to investigating which organizational strategies are effective at addressing gender and racial inequality in labor markets. Using a unique field study design, this article identifies and tests, for the first time, whether accountability and transparency in pay decisions—two popular organizational initiatives discussed among scholars and practitioners—may reduce the pay gap by employee gender, race, and foreign nationality. Through a longitudinal analysis of a large private company, I study the performance-based reward decisions concerning almost 9,000 employees before and after high-level management adopted a set of organizational procedures, introducing accountability and transparency into the company’s performance-reward system. Before such procedures were introduced, there was an observed gap in the distribution of performance-based rewards where women, ethnic minorities, and non-U.S.-born employees received lower monetary rewards compared with U.S.-born white men having the same performance evaluation scores and working in the same job and work unit with the same manager and the same human capital characteristics. Analyses of the company’s employee performance-reward data after the adoption of accountability and transparency procedures show a reduction in this pay gap. I conclude by discussing the implications of this study for future research about employer strategies targeting workplace inequality and diversity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/orsc.2014.0950

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transparency in the racial composition of employees and managers may be an important tool to help control discrimination in hiring.

    “Just as the literature suggests salary transparency is a factor that can help control inequalities in earnings (e.g., Castilla 2015), transparency in the racial composition of employees and managers may be an important tool to help control discrimination in hiring.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castilla, E. J.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Castilla, Emilio J.
Venue
Organization Science
Published
2015-04
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
311-333
ISSN
  • 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5455
OpenAlex
W2112689551
Cited by
255
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
22.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organization Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Keywords
wage gap, organizational accountability, transparency, performance-based rewards, gender inequality, racial inequality, workplace inequality, diversity management, field experiments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review