The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Value Cocreation and Service Systems (Re)Formation: A Service Ecosystems View
Abstract
This article explores a service-dominant (S-D) logic, service-ecosystems approach to studying value cocreation and the (re)formation of service systems. We outline the central premises of S-D logic and elaborate the concept of a service ecosystem to propose a framework that focuses on resource integration as a central means for connecting people and technology within and among service systems. This ecosystems view emphasizes the social factors that influence, and are influenced by, service-for-service exchange. We draw on systems theory and a structurational model of technology to underscore the importance of networks of actors, as well as institutions—e.g., rules, social norms—as critical components of service systems. We argue that this service-ecosystems framework provides a robust and dynamic approach for studying resource integration, value cocreation, and the (re)formation of service systems, and provides important insights for systematically innovating service.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 · Cited by 14,779
Self-citationService-dominant logic: continuing the evolution
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6 · Cited by 7,824
Self-citationThe Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957
Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems
Ostrom, E. (2010) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.100.3.641 · Cited by 4,529
Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange
Chandler, J. D., & Vargo, S. L. (2011) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593110393713 · Cited by 1,161
Self-citation
Cited by
The Internet-of-Things: Review and research directions
Ng, I. C. L., & Wakenshaw, S. Y. L. (2017) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.003 · Cited by 621
Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts
Audretsch, D. B., Cunningham, J. A., Kuratko, D. F., Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2019) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-018-9690-4 · Cited by 480
Technology as an operant resource in service (eco)systems
Akaka, M. A., & Vargo, S. L. (2014) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-013-0220-5 · Cited by 335
Self-citationBeirão, G., Patrício, L., & Fisk, R. P. (2017) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-11-2015-0357 · Cited by 271
Ramasubbu, N., & Kemerer, C. F. (2021) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2021.1870377 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Vargo, S. L., & Akaka, M. A.
- Venue
- Service Science
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 207-217
- ISSN
- 2164-3962 (ISSN-L)
- 2164-3970
- OpenAlex
- W2172104004
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 32.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Value Cocreation and Service Systems (Re)Formation: A Service Ecosystems View. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/serv.1120.0019
- The paper
- Vargo, S. L., & Akaka, M. A. (2012). Value Cocreation and Service Systems (Re)Formation: A Service Ecosystems View. Service Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.1120.0019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.