Cited by 41Educational Games and GamificationInnovative Teaching Methodologies in Social SciencesScience Education and Pedagogy

The Effects of Game-Based Learning and Anticipation of a Test on the Learning Outcomes of 10th Grade Geology Students

Open access
Chang, Chun-Yen, Chen, Chia-Li Debra, Yeh, Ting-Kuang·2016·EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

Abstract

Background:This study examines whether a Role Play Game (RPG) with embedded geological contents and students’ anticipation of an upcoming posttest significantly affect high school students’ achievements of and attitudes toward geology.Material and methods:The participants of the study were comprised of 202 high school students, 103 males and 99 females. The students were divided into 4 groups: 1. RPG group with pre-announced posttest, 2. RPG group with unannounced posttest, 3. No RPG group with pre-announced posttest, and 4. No RPG group with unannounced posttest. A 2x2 MANCOVA was conducted on the posttest scores with students’ pretest scores as the covariates.Results:The results indicated that: (a) there was no statistically significant interaction effect between RPG and anticipation of posttest on students’ learning outcomes; (b) there was no statistically significant main effect for RPG on students’ learning outcomes; however, (c) whether or not students had anticipated an upcoming posttest significantly affected their geological achievements and attitudes.Conclusions:In conclusion, testing has positive effects as a reinforcement to help students both retain their content knowledge and have positive attitudes towards geology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1519a

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, C.-Y., Chen, C.-L. D., & Yeh, T.-K.
Affiliations
National Taiwan Normal University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chang, Chun-Yen
Venue
EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
Published
2016-03-20
Volume
12
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 1305-8215 (ISSN-L)
  • 1305-8223
OpenAlex
W2572045313
Cited by
41
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
6.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Council (MOST 105)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 105-, NSC102-2511-S003-052-MY3, NSC-102-)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
game-based learning, role-playing games, testing effect, geology education, high school students, learning outcomes, knowledge retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review