The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty: RESULTS OF A SURVEY OF 3600 PATIENTS FROM THE SWEDISH KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REGISTRY
Abstract
The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry (SKAR) has recorded knee arthroplasties prospectively in Sweden since 1975. The only outcome measure available to date has been revision status. While questionnaires on health outcome may function as more comprehensive endpoints, it is unclear which are the most appropriate. We tested various outcome questionnaires in order to determine which is the best for patients who have had knee arthroplasty as applied in a cross-sectional, discriminative, postal survey. Four general health questionnaires (NHP, SF-12, SF-36 and SIP) and three disease/site-specific questionnaires (Lequesne, Oxford-12, and WOMAC) were tested on 3600 patients randomly selected from the SKAR. Differences were found between questionnaires in response rate, time required for completion, the need for assistance, the efficiency of completion, the validity of the content and the reliability. The mean overall ranks for each questionnaire were generated. The SF-12 ranked the best for the general health, and the Oxford-12 for the disease/site-specific questionnaires. These two questionnaires could therefore be recommended as the most appropriate for use with a large knee arthroplasty database in a cross-sectional population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
WARE, J. E., KOSINSKI, M., & KELLER, S. D. (1996) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 · Cited by 17,392
SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide
Ware, J. (2003) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,424
Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha: Table 1
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572 · Cited by 5,300
Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.
Brazier, J. E., Harper, R., Jones, N. M., O'Cathain, A., Thomas, K. J., Usherwood, T., & Westlake, L. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160 · Cited by 4,653
QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE PERCEPTIONS OF PATIENTS ABOUT TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT
Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Carr, A., & Murray, D. (1996) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.78b2.0780185 · Cited by 2,896
A methodological framework for assessing health indices
Kirshner, B., & Guyatt, G. (1985) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(85)90005-0 · Cited by 1,538
Sullivan, M., Karlsson, J., & Ware, J. E. (1995) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00125-q · Cited by 1,315
A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study
Hunt, S. M., McKenna, S. P., McEwen, J., Backett, E. M., Williams, J., & Papp, E. (1980) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.34.4.281 · Cited by 924
Lequesne, M. G., Mery, C., Samson, M., & Gerard, P. (1987) · Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology · doi:10.3109/03009748709102182 · Cited by 786
Cited by
The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores
Murray, D. W., Fitzpatrick, R., Rogers, K., Pandit, H., Beard, D. J., Carr, A. J., & Dawson, J. (2007) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.89b8.19424 · Cited by 1,452
Choong, P. F., Dowsey, M. M., & Stoney, J. D. (2009) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.018 · Cited by 447
The validation of the visual analogue scale for patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty
Brokelman, R. B. G., Haverkamp, D., van Loon, C., Hol, A., van Kampen, A., & Veth, R. (2012) · European Orthopaedics and Traumatology · doi:10.1007/s12570-012-0100-3 · Cited by 260
Preoperative predictors of pain following total knee arthroplasty
Noiseux, N. O., Callaghan, J. J., Clark, C. R., Zimmerman, M. B., Sluka, K. A., & Rakel, B. A. (2014) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.034 · Cited by 109
“Recent reports have demonstrated only 70–88% satisfaction rates following TKA in regards to improvement in function and decrease in pain [11,15–18], and persistent moderate to severe pain in ten to thirty percent of patients at 1–7 years of follow-up [11,19–21].”
Pagé, M. G., Katz, J., Romero Escobar, E. M., Lutzky-Cohen, N., Curtis, K., Fuss, S., & Clarke, H. A. (2015) · Pain · doi:10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460327.10515.2d · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunbar, M. J., Robertsson, O., Ryd, L., & Lidgren, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 83-B
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 339-344x
- ISSN
- 0301-620X (ISSN-L)
- 2044-5377
- OpenAlex
- W2019627320
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 6.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty: RESULTS OF A SURVEY OF 3600 PATIENTS FROM THE SWEDISH KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REGISTRY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1302/0301-620x.83b3.0830339
- The paper
- Dunbar, M. J., Robertsson, O., Ryd, L., & Lidgren, L. (2001). Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty: RESULTS OF A SURVEY OF 3600 PATIENTS FROM THE SWEDISH KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REGISTRY. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.83b3.0830339
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
