Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 305

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anti‐bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome

Salmivalli, Christina, Kaukiainen, Ari, Voeten, Marinus·2005·British Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

Background. The participant role approach represents a view of bullying as a group process in which bystanders often encourage the bullying or silently witness it, while little support is given to the victim (e.g. ). There is a discrepancy between students' attitudes (which are often against bullying) and their actual behaviour in bullying situations, and this may be an important factor contributing to the persistence of the problem. Aim. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of an anti‐bullying intervention programme targeting the group as a whole. Class teachers who attended a 1‐year training course carried out the interventions in school classes. The present evaluation of the project is based on multi‐level modelling, assessing the programme effects after 12 months of intervention, utilizing a cohort longitudinal design with adjacent cohorts () also taking into account the degree of implementation of the programme. Sample. The intervention was implemented in 48 school classes (Grades 4, 5, and 6) from 16 Finnish schools, involving 1,220 children (600 girls and 620 boys). Method. The present report is based on questionnaire data collected at two assessment points during the project, assessing the frequencies of bullies and victims, the extent of observed and experienced bullying, students' attitudes and efficacy beliefs related to bullying, and their participant role behaviours (self‐ and peer‐reported). Reports were collected from teachers about the concrete actions taken in order to compare the actual content of the intervention to what had been planned. Results. A positive impact of the intervention programme was found on several outcome variables (e.g. frequencies of bullies and victims, observed and experienced bullying, attitudes and efficacy beliefs, and to some extent, participant role behaviours). The intervention effects were found more often in Grade 4 than in Grade 5, and often only in schools with a high degree of implementation of the programme.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/000709905x26011

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 305

Metadata

Authors
Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., & Voeten, M.
Venue
British Journal of Educational Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
465-487
ISSN
  • 0007-0998 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8279
OpenAlex
W2022771932
Cited by
305
References
1
FWCI
15.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anti‐bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/000709905x26011
The paper
Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., & Voeten, M. (2005). Anti‐bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905x26011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.