The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anti‐bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome
Abstract
Background. The participant role approach represents a view of bullying as a group process in which bystanders often encourage the bullying or silently witness it, while little support is given to the victim (e.g. ). There is a discrepancy between students' attitudes (which are often against bullying) and their actual behaviour in bullying situations, and this may be an important factor contributing to the persistence of the problem. Aim. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of an anti‐bullying intervention programme targeting the group as a whole. Class teachers who attended a 1‐year training course carried out the interventions in school classes. The present evaluation of the project is based on multi‐level modelling, assessing the programme effects after 12 months of intervention, utilizing a cohort longitudinal design with adjacent cohorts () also taking into account the degree of implementation of the programme. Sample. The intervention was implemented in 48 school classes (Grades 4, 5, and 6) from 16 Finnish schools, involving 1,220 children (600 girls and 620 boys). Method. The present report is based on questionnaire data collected at two assessment points during the project, assessing the frequencies of bullies and victims, the extent of observed and experienced bullying, students' attitudes and efficacy beliefs related to bullying, and their participant role behaviours (self‐ and peer‐reported). Reports were collected from teachers about the concrete actions taken in order to compare the actual content of the intervention to what had been planned. Results. A positive impact of the intervention programme was found on several outcome variables (e.g. frequencies of bullies and victims, observed and experienced bullying, attitudes and efficacy beliefs, and to some extent, participant role behaviours). The intervention effects were found more often in Grade 4 than in Grade 5, and often only in schools with a high degree of implementation of the programme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00629 · Cited by 2,694
Cited by
Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review
Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1 · Cited by 1,624
The Effectiveness of Whole-School Antibullying Programs: A Synthesis of Evaluation Research
Smith, J. D., Schneider, B. H., Smith, P. K., & Ananiadou, K. (2004) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2004.12086267 · Cited by 561
Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2019) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.001 · Cited by 518
Arseneault, L. (2018) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12841 · Cited by 501
Yeager, D. S., Fong, C. J., Lee, H. Y., & Espelage, D. L. (2015) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.005 · Cited by 472
Metadata
- Authors
- Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., & Voeten, M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 465-487
- ISSN
- 0007-0998 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8279
- OpenAlex
- W2022771932
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anti‐bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/000709905x26011
- The paper
- Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., & Voeten, M. (2005). Anti‐bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905x26011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.