Cited by 176Attachment and Relationship DynamicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Parental recall, attachment relating and self‐attacking/self‐reassurance: Their relationship with depression

Irons, C., Gilbert, P., Baldwin, M.W., Baccus, J. R., Palmer, M.·2006·British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Objectives When things go wrong for people they can become self-critical or focus on positive, reassuring aspects of the self. This study explored the relationship between forms of self-criticism and self-reassurance, recall of parental experiences and attachment style in relation to depressed symptoms in students. Methods A sample of 197 undergraduate students from the UK and Canada completed self-report questionnaires measuring recall of parental styles, attachment, forms of self-criticism, self-reassurance, and depression symptoms. Results Recall of parents as rejecting and overprotecting was significantly related to both inadequacy and self-hating self-criticism. In contrast, parental warmth was negatively correlated with these forms of self-criticism. In addition, when things go wrong for the person, recall of parental warmth was associated with the ability to be self-reassuring. A mediator analysis suggested that (I) the impact of recall of negative parenting on depression is mediated through the forms of self-criticism and (2) the effect of parental warmth on depression was mediated by the ability to be self-reassuring. Conclusions The impacts of negative parenting styles may translate into vulnerabilities to depression via the way children (and later adults) develop their self-to-self relating (e.g. as self-critical versus self-reassuring). Hence, there is a need for further research on the link between attachment experiences, recall of parental rejection/warmth and t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/014466505x68230

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Irons, C., Gilbert, P., Baldwin, M. W., Baccus, J. R., & Palmer, M.
Corresponding author
Gilbert, P.
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-09
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
297-308
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
OpenAlex
W2161353780
Cited by
176
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
parental recall, attachment styles, self-criticism, self-reassurance, depressive symptoms, parental rejection, parental warmth, parental overprotection, undergraduate students, mediation
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Child, Child Rearing, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Object Attachment, Personality Inventory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, Rejection, Psychology, Risk Factors, Self Care, Self Concept, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review