The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Using a single‐item approach to measure facet job satisfaction
Abstract
This study builds on the work of Wanous, Reichers, and Hudy (1997) by investigating the use of a single‐item approach measuring facet satisfaction. Participants consisted of 207 employees from a variety of organizations who completed a job satisfaction survey containing the Job Descriptive Index (JDI) as well as a single‐item which also measured each of five JDI facets. Results indicated that the single‐item facet measure was significantly correlated with each of the JDI facets (correlations ranged from .60 to .72). Results also indicated that the single‐item approach compared favourably to the JDI and in some cases accounted for incremental variance in self‐reported job performance and intentions to turnover. Implications include the notions that single‐item measures may be easier and take less time to complete, may be less expensive, may contain more face validity, and may be more flexible than multiple‐item scales measuring facet satisfaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being.
Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138 · Cited by 1,794
BarNir, A., Watson, W. E., & Hutchins, H. M. (2011) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00713.x · Cited by 508
(2009) · Cited by 355
Theoretical Considerations and Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Trust in Automation
Körber, M. (2019) · Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_2 · Cited by 317
Neubert, M. J., Hunter, E. M., & Tolentino, R. C. (2016) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.005 · Cited by 214
Van den Broeck, A., Lens, W., De Witte, H., & Van Coillie, H. (2013) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.11.005 · Cited by 192
Delgadillo, J., Saxon, D., & Barkham, M. (2018) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.22766 · Cited by 151
Labrague, L. J., Al Sabei, S., Al Rawajfah, O., AbuAlRub, R., & Burney, I. (2022) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/jonm.13491 · Cited by 101
Gender, Sexual Prejudice and Sport Participation: Implications for Sexual Minorities
Sartore, M. L., & Cunningham, G. B. (2009) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9502-7 · Cited by 85
Bal, P. M., & Dorenbosch, L. (2015) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12058 · Cited by 77
Theoretical considerations and development of a questionnaire to measure trust in automation
Körber, M. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/nfc45 · Cited by 71
Predicting implementation from organizational readiness for change: A study protocol
Helfrich, C. D., Blevins, D., Smith, J. L., Kelly, P. A., Hogan, T. P., Hagedorn, H., Dubbert, P. M., & Sales, A. E. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-76 · Cited by 66
Nursing work environment, value congruence and their relationships with nurses’ work outcomes
Shao, J., Tang, L., Wang, X., Qiu, R., Zhang, Y., Jia, Y., Ma, Y., & Ye, Z. (2018) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/jonm.12641 · Cited by 46
Matthijs Bal, P., & Visser, M. S. (2011) · Educational Management Administration & Leadership · doi:10.1177/1741143211408448 · Cited by 30
Psychological Mediators of the Sport Injury—Perceived Risk Relationship
Deroche, T., Stephan, Y., Woodman, T., & Le Scanff, C. (2012) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01646.x · Cited by 29
Using experience sampling to link software repositories with emotions and work well-being
Kuutila, M., Mäntylä, M. V., Claes, M., Elovainio, M., & Adams, B. (2018) · Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement · doi:10.1145/3239235.3239245 · Cited by 28
Beginning of the Pandemic: COVID-19-Elicited Anxiety as a Predictor of Working Memory Performance
Fellman, D., Ritakallio, L., Waris, O., Jylkkä, J., & Laine, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.576466 · Cited by 21
“On the other hand, previous studies have shown that some constructs can in fact be measured adequately using single items (Scarpello and Campbell, 1983; Nagy, 2002).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Nagy, M. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-86
- ISSN
- 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8325
- OpenAlex
- W2125474140
- Cited by
- 1,043
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
