Familiarity breeds content: The impact of exposure to change on employee openness and well‐being
Abstract
This article describes a longitudinal study of how openness to change, job satisfaction, anxiety and depression are affected by exposure to a change situation ‐ in this case, the implementation of new technology and work practices. Measures were taken before the change was fully implemented and again several months later. Employees fell into two groups: those with high exposure to the change and those with low exposure. Longitudinal analysis revealed that greater exposure was directly related to subsequent improvements in openness to change for operational employees, but not for managers and engineers. Exposure was associated with improvements in job satisfaction and depression, irrespective of job type. The effect on job satisfaction, however, could be accounted for by the increased job complexity experienced on the new technology rather than exposure to change per se . Although the impact of exposure on depression became non‐significant after controlling for job complexity, the result was marginal. Implications of the role of exposure in the management of change are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Depression measure was very robust (α = 0.95).
“The present study found this measure to be very robust (α = 0.95).”
From Smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics, and algorithms (STARA): employees' perceptions of our future workplace (2018) · cites this paper as Axtell et al. (2002)
Cites
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076546 · Cited by 7,246 · see citing works
The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health.
Warr, P. (1990) · Journal of Occupational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00521.x · Cited by 1,490 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Job-related anxiety and depression were measured using the shortened version of Warr’s (1990) anxiety–contentment and depression–enthusiasm scales (see Mullarkey, Wall, Warr, Clegg, & Stride, 1998).”
MethodVenkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., & Ackerman, P. L. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2896 · Cited by 1,237 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332 · Cited by 2,303 · see citing works
Brougham, D., & Haar, J. (2018) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2016.55 · Cited by 1,117 · see citing works
Employees' attitudes toward organizational change: A literature review
Choi, M. (2011) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.20434 · Cited by 520 · see citing works
Bhargava, A., Bester, M., & Bolton, L. (2021) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-020-00153-8 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
- Authors
- Axtell, C., Wall, T., Stride, C., Pepper, K., Clegg, C., Gardner, P., & Bolden, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- University of Leeds (GB)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Axtell, Carolyn
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 217-231
- ISSN
- 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8325
- OpenAlex
- W2112988267
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Change
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- openness to change, organizational change, job satisfaction, anxiety, depression, employee well-being, job complexity, technology implementation, change management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review