Cited by 1,305Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorHuman Behavior and Motivation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work‐related Basic Need Satisfaction scale

Open access
Van den Broeck, Anja, Vansteenkiste, Maarten, De Witte, Hans, Soenens, Bart, Lens, Willy·2010·Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Abstract

The satisfaction of the basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, as defined in Self‐Determination Theory, has been identified as an important predictor of individuals' optimal functioning in various life domains. The study of work‐related need satisfaction seems, however, hampered by the lack of a validated measure. To assist future research, the present study aimed to develop and validate a Work‐related Basic Need Satisfaction scale (W‐BNS). Using four Dutch‐speaking samples, evidence was found for the three‐factor structure of the scale, the discriminant validity, and the reliability of the three need satisfaction subscales as well as their criterion‐related and predictive validity. The W‐BNS may therefore be considered as a promising tool for future research and practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/096317909x481382

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 83 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Byrne B. M., 2001, Structural equation modelling with AMOS. Basic concepts, application, and programming
  3. Jöreskog K. G., 2004, LISREL 8.5 user's reference guide
  4. Nunnally J. C., 1994, Psychometric theory
  5. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Schaufeli W. B., 2000, Handleiding van de Utrechtse Burnout Schaal (UBOS) [Manual Utrecht Burnout Scale]
  7. Broeck A., 2008, Occupational health psychology: European perspectives on research, education, and practice, 63
  8. Veldhoven M., 1994, Het meten van psychosociale arbeidsbelasting met een vragenlijst: De vragenlijst beleving en beoordeling van de arbeid (VBBA) [The measurement of psychosocial job demands with a questionnaire: The questionnaire on the experience and evaluation of work]
  9. 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.219 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., Soenens, B., & Lens, W.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12
Volume
83
Issue
4
Pages
981-1002
ISSN
  • 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8325
OpenAlex
W2009114734
Cited by
1,305
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 102 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 110 · 2020: 138 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 33
FWCI
39.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
Keywords
autonomy, competence, relatedness, self-determination theory, scale development, psychometric validation, employee motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review