Cited by 247Gender, Labor, and Family DynamicsSocial Policies and FamilyFamily Dynamics and Relationships

The impact of family policy expenditure on fertility in western Europe

Open access
Kalwij, Adriaan·2010·Demography

Abstract

This article analyzes the impact on fertility of changes in national expenditure for family allowances, maternity- and parental-leave benefits, and childcare subsidies. To do so, I estimate a model for the timing of births using individual-level data from 16 western European countries, supplemented with data on national social expenditure for different family policy programs. The latter allow approximation of the subsidies that households with children receive from such programs. The results show that increased expenditure on family policy programs that help women to combine family and employment-and thus reduce the opportunity cost of children—generates positive fertility responses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/dem.0.0104

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies suggest the effect of leave policies is mainly on the first birth as opposed to higher order births, and some suggest the effect is larger for more highly educated individuals.

    “Some studies suggest that the effect appears to be mainly on the first birth (e.g., Brini 2020; Kalwij 2010) as opposed to higher order births, and some suggest that the effect is larger for more highly educated individuals (Baizan, Arpino, and Delclòs 2016).”

    From Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections (2025) · cites this paper as Kalwij 2010

  • Expenditures on childcare have a positive impact on the first birth, and earner-carer support has a positive impact on the first and second births but not on the third.

    “Kalwij (2010) reported a positive impact of the expenditures on childcare on the first birth, while Billingsley and Ferrarini (2014) reported a positive impact of their earner-carer support index on the first and second births, but not on the third.”

    From Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections (2025) · cites this paper as Kalwij 2010

  • These policies have gone hand-in-hand with other policies in education, housing, health, and care, which have served to lower the perceived risks and opportunity costs associated with starting and growing a family.

    “These policies have gone hand-in-hand with other policies in education, housing, health, and care (for instance), which have served to lower the perceived risks and opportunity costs associated with starting and growing a family (Kalwij 2010).”

    From Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections (2025) · cites this paper as Kalwij 2010

  • Countries with extensive public support to families also tend to have higher fertility.

    “Countries with extensive public support to families also tend to have higher fertility (e.g., Gauthier and Hatzius 1997; Kalwij 2010; Wood et al. 2016; Gauthier 2007)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalwij, A.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Kalwij, Adriaan
Venue
Demography
Published
2010-05-01
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
503-519
ISSN
  • 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-7790
OpenAlex
W2104566147
Cited by
247
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
23.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Demography (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
family policy, fertility, family allowances, maternity benefits, parental leave, child care subsidies, social spending, birth timing, opportunity cost of children, work-family balance, Western Europe
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Birth Rate, Child, Child Care, Computer Simulation, Europe, Family Characteristics, Female, Fertility, Financing, Government, Humans, Proportional Hazards Models, Parental Leave, Family Planning Policy, Reproductive Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review