The impact of family policy expenditure on fertility in western Europe
Open accessAbstract
This article analyzes the impact on fertility of changes in national expenditure for family allowances, maternity- and parental-leave benefits, and childcare subsidies. To do so, I estimate a model for the timing of births using individual-level data from 16 western European countries, supplemented with data on national social expenditure for different family policy programs. The latter allow approximation of the subsidies that households with children receive from such programs. The results show that increased expenditure on family policy programs that help women to combine family and employment-and thus reduce the opportunity cost of children—generates positive fertility responses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some studies suggest the effect of leave policies is mainly on the first birth as opposed to higher order births, and some suggest the effect is larger for more highly educated individuals.
“Some studies suggest that the effect appears to be mainly on the first birth (e.g., Brini 2020; Kalwij 2010) as opposed to higher order births, and some suggest that the effect is larger for more highly educated individuals (Baizan, Arpino, and Delclòs 2016).”
From Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections (2025) · cites this paper as Kalwij 2010
Expenditures on childcare have a positive impact on the first birth, and earner-carer support has a positive impact on the first and second births but not on the third.
“Kalwij (2010) reported a positive impact of the expenditures on childcare on the first birth, while Billingsley and Ferrarini (2014) reported a positive impact of their earner-carer support index on the first and second births, but not on the third.”
From Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections (2025) · cites this paper as Kalwij 2010
These policies have gone hand-in-hand with other policies in education, housing, health, and care, which have served to lower the perceived risks and opportunity costs associated with starting and growing a family.
“These policies have gone hand-in-hand with other policies in education, housing, health, and care (for instance), which have served to lower the perceived risks and opportunity costs associated with starting and growing a family (Kalwij 2010).”
From Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections (2025) · cites this paper as Kalwij 2010
Countries with extensive public support to families also tend to have higher fertility.
“Countries with extensive public support to families also tend to have higher fertility (e.g., Gauthier and Hatzius 1997; Kalwij 2010; Wood et al. 2016; Gauthier 2007)”
From Can Policies Stall the Fertility Fall? A Systematic Review of the (Quasi‐) Experimental Literature (2021) · cites this paper as Kalwij 2010
Cites
Becker, G. S. (1991) · doi:10.4159/9780674020665 · Cited by 10,565 · see citing works
Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811241 · Cited by 8,092 · see citing works
Fertility, Employment, and Child-Care Costs
Blau, D. M., & Robins, P. K. (1989) · Demography · doi:10.2307/2061526 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Does family policy affect fertility?: Lessons from Sweden
Björklund, A. (2006) · Journal of Population Economics · doi:10.1007/s00148-005-0024-0 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Balbo, N., Billari, F. C., & Mills, M. (2013) · European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie · doi:10.1007/s10680-012-9277-y · Cited by 623 · see citing works
Family policies in developed countries: a ‘fertility-booster’ with side-effects
Thévenon, O., & Gauthier, A. H. (2011) · Community, Work & Family · doi:10.1080/13668803.2011.571400 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Can Policies Stall the Fertility Fall? A Systematic Review of the (Quasi‐) Experimental Literature
Bergsvik, J., Fauske, A., & Hart, R. K. (2021) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/padr.12431 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Neyer, G., Lappegård, T., & Vignoli, D. (2013) · European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie · doi:10.1007/s10680-013-9292-7 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections
Gauthier, A. H., & Gietel‐Basten, S. (2025) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/padr.12691 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Could Pronatalist Policies Discourage Childbearing?
Botev, N. (2015) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00048.x · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Universal Transfers, Tax Breaks and Fertility: Evidence from a Regional Reform in Norway
Hart, R. K., & Galloway, T. A. (2023) · Population Research and Policy Review · doi:10.1007/s11113-023-09793-z · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Fernandez-Barra, N., Gutierrez-Contreras, P., Poroj-Caraballo, E., Arratia, T., & Poblete L, J. A. (2026) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119456
- Authors
- Kalwij, A.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Kalwij, Adriaan
- ORCID
- Kalwij, Adriaan
- Venue
- Demography
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2010-05-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 503-519
- ISSN
- 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-7790
- PMC
- PMC3000017
- OpenAlex
- W2104566147
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 23.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Demography (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- family policy, fertility, family allowances, maternity benefits, parental leave, child care subsidies, social spending, birth timing, opportunity cost of children, work-family balance, Western Europe
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Birth Rate, Child, Child Care, Computer Simulation, Europe, Family Characteristics, Female, Fertility, Financing, Government, Humans, Proportional Hazards Models, Parental Leave, Family Planning Policy, Reproductive Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review