The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003
Abstract
This paper reports trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003 in the United States. Analyses of census and Current Population Survey data show that educational homogamy decreased from 1940 to 1960 but increased from 1960 to 2003. From 1960 to the early 1970s, increases in educational homogamy were generated by decreasing intermarriage among groups of relatively well-educated persons. College graduates, in particular, were increasingly likely to marry each other rather than those with less education. Beginning in the early 1970s, however, continued increases in the odds of educational homogamy were generated by decreases in intermarriage at both ends of the education distribution. Most striking is the decline in the odds that those with very low levels of education marry up. Intermarriage between college graduates and those with “some college” continued to decline but at a more gradual pace. As intermarriage declined at the extremes of the education distribution, intermarriage among those in the middle portion of the distribution increased. These trends, which are similar for a broad cross section of married couples and for newlyweds, are consistent with a growing social divide between those with very low levels of education and those with more education in the United States.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agresti, A. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471249688 · Cited by 6,746
Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors
Katz, L. F., & Murphy, K. M. (1992) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118323 · Cited by 4,793
Cited by
(2011) · Issue Lab (Candid) · Cited by 1,167
Re‐theorizing Family Demographics
Esping‐Andersen, G., & Billari, F. C. (2015) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00024.x · Cited by 763
Incarceration and Stratification
Wakefield, S., & Uggen, C. (2010) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102551 · Cited by 747
Gendered Sexuality in Young Adulthood: Double Binds and Flawed Options
Hamilton, L., & Armstrong, E. A. (2009) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243209345829 · Cited by 471
Marry Your Like: Assortative Mating and Income Inequality
Greenwood, J., Guner, N., Kocharkov, G., & Santos, C. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.5.348 · Cited by 411
Changing Relationships between Education and Fertility: A Study of Women and Men Born 1940 to 1964
Kravdal, Ø., & Rindfuss, R. R. (2008) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240807300508 · Cited by 410
A Multigenerational View of Inequality
Mare, R. D. (2011) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-011-0014-7 · Cited by 410
Self-citationThe Growing Racial and Ethnic Divide in U.S. Marriage Patterns
Raley, R. K., Sweeney, M. M., & Wondra, D. (2015) · The Future of Children · doi:10.1353/foc.2015.0014 · Cited by 309
Gendered racial exclusion among white internet daters
Feliciano, C., Robnett, B., & Komaie, G. (2009) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.09.004 · Cited by 199
Debt, Cohabitation, and Marriage in Young Adulthood
Addo, F. R. (2014) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-014-0333-6 · Cited by 192
Education and the Transition to Fatherhood: The Role of Selection Into Union
Trimarchi, A., & Van Bavel, J. (2017) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-016-0533-3 · Cited by 161
The gender divide in urban China: Singlehood and assortative mating by age and education
Qian, Y., & Qian, Z. (2014) · Demographic Research · doi:10.4054/demres.2014.31.45 · Cited by 122
Kamp Dush, C. M., Yavorsky, J. E., & Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J. (2018) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-017-0841-0 · Cited by 122
(2008) · doi:10.1787/9789264040663-11-en · Cited by 121
Social Science Methods for Twins Data: Integrating Causality, Endowments, and Heritability
Kohler, H.-P., Behrman, J. R., & Schnittker, J. (2011) · Biodemography and Social Biology · doi:10.1080/19485565.2011.580619 · Cited by 116
(2019) · Cited by 115
Kravdal, Ø. (2007) · Demographic Research · doi:10.4054/demres.2007.17.9 · Cited by 89
Mäenpää, E., & Jalovaara, M. (2015) · Advances in Life Course Research · doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2015.09.001 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, C. R., & Mare, R. D.
- Venue
- Demography
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2005-11-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 621-646
- ISSN
- 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-7790
- OpenAlex
- W2160420871
- Cited by
- 1,033
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 58.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.