Cited by 330Career Development and DiversityHigher Education Research StudiesCritical Race Theory in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Considering the Impact of Racial Stigmas and Science Identity: Persistence among Biomedical and Behavioral Science Aspirants

Open access
Chang, Mitchell J., Eagan, M. Kevin, Lin, Monica H., Hurtado, Sylvia·2011·The Journal of Higher Education

Abstract

This longitudinal study examined whether the combination of having negative racial interactions and identifying with one's domain of study affects underrepresented racial minority freshmen. In line with stereotype threat theory, students reporting higher levels of this combination of experiences and attributes were significantly less likely to persist in their intended biomedical or behavioral science major.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00221546.2011.11777218

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 76 references

4 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Anaya, G., & Cole, D. G. (2001). Latina/o student achievement: Exploring the influence of student-faculty interactions on college grades. Journal of College Student Development, 42 (1), 3–14.
  2. Aronson, J., & Salinas, M. F. (1997). Stereotype threat, attributional ambiguity, and Latino underperformance. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas, Austin.
  3. Center for Institutional Data Exchange and Analysis. (2000). 1999-2000 SMET retention report. Norman: University of Oklahoma.
  4. Keup, J. R., & Stolzenberg, E. B. (2004). Your first college year survey: Exploring the academic and personal experiences of first-year students. Columbia: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First Year Experience and Students in Transition.
  5. Sax, L. J., Hurtado, S., Lindholm, J., Astin, A. W., Korn, W., & Mahoney, K. (2004). The American freshman: National norms for fall 2004. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute.
  6. Sullivan Commission. (2004). Missing persons: Minorities in the health professions. Retrieved March 2006, from http://www.sullivancommission.org
  7. 10.7208/chicago/9780226922461.001.0001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 330

Metadata

Authors
Chang, M. J., Eagan, M. K., Lin, M. H., & Hurtado, S.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
The Journal of Higher Education
Published
2011-09
Volume
82
Issue
5
Pages
564-596
ISSN
  • 0022-1546 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4640
OpenAlex
W2113237143
Cited by
330
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
18.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM071968)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
Keywords
racial stigma, science identity, stereotype threat, persistence, first-generation college students, racial interaction, first-year students, college major choice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review