Cited by 153Higher Education Research StudiesCareer Development and DiversityHigher Education and Employability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Supporting students’ intentions to persist in STEM disciplines: The role of living-learning programs among other social-cognitive factors

Soldner, Matthew, Rowan-Kenyon, Heather, Inkelas, Karen Kurotsuchi, Garvey, Jason, Robbins, Claire·2012·The Journal of Higher Education

Abstract

Using Social Cognitive Career Theory as a guide, we explored the relationship between students' participation in living-learning programs and their intention to earn a baccalaureate in STEM. We found that STEM-focused programs, in comparison to general forms, held promise in supporting students' intentions to graduate in a STEM field.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00221546.2012.11777246

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Anderson J. A., 2004, Transforming the first-year experience of college for students of color, 3
  2. Bandura A., 1977, Psychological Review, 84, 191, 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Brower A. M., 1998, About Campus, 15
  4. Brower A. M., 2004, Paper presented at the meeting of the National Learning Communities Project Conference
  5. Byrne B., 2006, Structural equation modeling with EQS
  6. Haycock K., 2001, Educational Leadership, 58, 6
  7. Inkelas, K. K., Brower, A. M., & Associates, 2004, The National Study of Living Learning Programs: 2004 report of findings
  8. Inkelas K. K., 2009, Residence life programs and new student programs, 53
  9. Lent R. W., 2000, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 36, 10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.36 · DOI · Paper page
  10. National Center for Education Statistics, 2009, Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education
  11. National Science Board, 2007, A national plan for addressing the critical needs of U.S. science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education system
  12. National Science Foundation, 2007, Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering
  13. Rendón L. I., 2004, Transforming the first-year experience of college for students of color
  14. Ting S. M. R., 2001, International Journal of Engineering Education, 17, 75

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 153

Metadata

Authors
Soldner, M., Rowan-Kenyon, H., Inkelas, K. K., Garvey, J., & Robbins, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Venue
The Journal of Higher Education
Published
2012-05
Volume
83
Issue
3
Pages
311-336
ISSN
  • 0022-1546 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4640
OpenAlex
W2100389008
Cited by
153
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8
FWCI
45.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
Keywords
living-learning programs, STEM persistence, social cognitive career theory, student retention, baccalaureate degree completion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review