The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Syntax: Processing Dative Constructions in American and Australian Varieties of English
Abstract
The present study uses probabilistic models of corpus data in a novel way, to measure and compare the syntactic predictive capacities of speakers' of different varieties of the same language. The study finds that speakers' knowledge of probabilistic grammatical choices can vary across different varieties of the same language and can be detected psycholinguistically in the individual. In three pairs of experiments, Australians and Americans responded reliably to corpus model probabilities in rating the naturalness of alternative dative constructions, their lexical-decision latencies during reading varied inversely with the syntactic probabilities of the construction, and they showed subtle covariation in these tasks, which is in line with quantitative differences in the choices of datives produced in the same contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x · Cited by 48,949
Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
(2001) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2001.s574 · Cited by 9,278
Harrell, F. E. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3462-1 · Cited by 9,195
Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 · Cited by 8,540
Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank
Marcus, M. (1993) · doi:10.21236/ada273556 · Cited by 7,405
Harrell (2015) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19425-7 · Cited by 6,878
Regression Diagnostics -- Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
Beaumont, C. D., Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1981) · The Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2581267 · Cited by 6,359
Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (2004) · Optimality Theory in Phonology · doi:10.1002/9780470756171.ch1 · Cited by 4,683
A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122 · Cited by 4,153
Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models
Jaeger, T. F. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007 · Cited by 3,317 · cited 1×
“To attack this problem head-on, we make use of multilevel (also termed mixed effect) regression models, which are of growing importance in the language sciences (Baayen 2008, Johnson 2008, Baayen et al. 2008, Quené and van den Bergh 2008, Jaeger 2008).”
MethodLinguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies
Gibson, E. (1998) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00034-1 · Cited by 2,537
English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation
Tenny, C., & Levin, B. (1995) · Language · doi:10.2307/415968 · Cited by 2,299
Expectation-based syntactic comprehension
Levy, R. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006 · Cited by 2,202
SWITCHBOARD: telephone speech corpus for research and development
Godfrey, J. J., Holliman, E. C., & McDaniel, J. (1992) · [Proceedings] ICASSP-92: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.1992.225858 · Cited by 2,134 · cited 14×
“Then there is the question of whether the two English dative constructions illustrated in (2a,b) are syntactic alternatives at all.”
BackgroundInfluentialAnalyzing linguistic data : a practical introduction to statistics using R
Baayen, R. H. (2008) · Cited by 2,069
Cairns, H. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1996) · Language · doi:10.2307/416113 · Cited by 1,920
Syntactic persistence in language production
Bock, J. K. (1986) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6 · Cited by 1,911
Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars
Hawkins, J. A. (2004) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001 · Cited by 1,743
Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00059-1 · Cited by 1,735
Cognitive Status and the form of Referring Expressions in Discourse
Gundel, J., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (2019) · The Oxford Handbook of Reference · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.5 · Cited by 1,645
Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change
Kroch, A. S. (1989) · Language Variation and Change · doi:10.1017/s0954394500000168 · Cited by 1,620
Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure
Pinker, S. (2013) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9700.001.0001 · Cited by 1,452
Toward a taxonomy of given-new information
Prince, E. F. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,302
English Verb Classes and Alternations
김두식 (2006) · 담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집 · Cited by 1,276
DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1504 · Cited by 1,240
Borsay, L. A., & Lyons, J. (1972) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/324060 · Cited by 1,151
A probabilistic earley parser as a psycholinguistic model
Hale, J. (2001) · Second meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Language technologies 2001 - NAACL '01 · doi:10.3115/1073336.1073357 · Cited by 1,150
Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on `alternations'
Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004) · International Journal of Corpus Linguistics · doi:10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri · Cited by 961
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/s0749-596x(03)00023-8 · Cited by 959
The Dependency Locality Theory: A Distance-Based Theory of Linguistic Complexity
Gibson, E. (2001) · Image, Language, Brain · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3654.003.0008 · Cited by 937
Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
(2000) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/b98882 · Cited by 930
Anticipating Upcoming Words in Discourse: Evidence From ERPs and Reading Times.
Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443 · Cited by 930
Syntactic Priming: A Corpus-based Approach
Gries, S. T. (2005) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-005-6139-3 · Cited by 818
Arnold, J. E., Losongco, A., Wasow, T., & Ginstrom, R. (2000) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2000.0045 · Cited by 798
Hierarchy of features and ergativity
Silverstein, M. (1976) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4688088 · Cited by 784
Aylett, M., & Turk, A. (2004) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/00238309040470010201 · Cited by 781
A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency
Covington, M. A., & Hawkins, J. A. (1999) · Language · doi:10.2307/417736 · Cited by 761
Language Universals: With Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies
Greenberg, J. H. (1966) · Cited by 759
Magnitude Estimation of Linguistic Acceptability
Bard, E. G., Robertson, D., & Sorace, A. (1996) · Language · doi:10.2307/416793 · Cited by 721
Bock, J. K. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.89.1.1 · Cited by 695
Predicting the dative alternation
Bresnan, J. W., Cueni, A., Nikitina, T. V., & Baayen, R. H. (2007) · Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics · Cited by 694
Self-citationAn Incremental Procedural Grammar for Sentence Formulation
Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. C. M. (1987) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/s0364-0213(87)80006-x · Cited by 671
The Principle of Contrast: A Constraint on Language Acquisition
(2014) · Mechanisms of Language Acquisition · doi:10.4324/9781315798721-7 · Cited by 664
Constraints on the agentless passive
Weiner, E. J., & Labov, W. (1983) · Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0022226700007441 · Cited by 651
The Learnability and Acquisition of the Dative Alternation in English
Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., Goldberg, R., & Wilson, R. (1989) · Language · doi:10.2307/415332 · Cited by 645
Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension?
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.002 · Cited by 642
From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft.
Bock, K., Loebell, H., & Morey, R. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.99.1.150 · Cited by 641
Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey
(1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511620577 · Cited by 627
Language production : Grammatical encoding
Bock, K., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 622
Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop?
Lavandera, B. R. (1978) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404500005510 · Cited by 619
Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation
Bouma, G., Krämer, I. M., & Zwarts, J. (2007) · Radboud Repository (Radboud University) · Cited by 580
Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change
van Kemenade, A. M. C., & Vincent, N. (1997) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · Cited by 573
Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure
(1991) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4158.001.0001 · Cited by 565
Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data
Quené, H., & van den Bergh, H. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.02.002 · Cited by 534
Markedness and Subject Choice in Optimality Theory
Aissen, J. (1999) · Natural Language & Linguistic Theory · doi:10.1023/a:1006335629372 · Cited by 519
Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The
MarcusMitchell, P., Ann, M., & SantoriniBeatrice (1993) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.5555/972470.972475 · Cited by 489
Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations
(2002) · Cognitive Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cogl.2002.022 · Cited by 487
Semantics and Syntactic Regularity
Oehrle, R. T., & Green, G. M. (1977) · Language · doi:10.2307/413064 · Cited by 469
Bolinger, D. L. (1977) · Cited by 460
Consequences of the Serial Nature of Linguistic Input for Sentenial Complexity
Grodner, D., & Gibson, E. (2005) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_7 · Cited by 455
Part-of-Speech Tagging Guidelines for the Penn Treebank Project (3rd Revision)
Santorini, B. (1990) · ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 434
Drift and the Evolution of English Style: A History of Three Genres
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989) · Language · doi:10.2307/415220 · Cited by 433
Quantitative methods in linguistics
Johnson, K. A. (2008) · Cited by 414
Gradient grammar: An effect of animacy on the syntax of give in New Zealand and American English
Bresnan, J., & Hay, J. (2008) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.007 · Cited by 406
Self-citationExperience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension
WELLS, J., CHRISTIANSEN, M., RACE, D., ACHESON, D., & MACDONALD, M. (2009) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.002 · Cited by 397
Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change
Diessel, H. (2007) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.02.002 · Cited by 386
Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis
Roland, D., Dick, F., & Elman, J. L. (2007) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002 · Cited by 379
Word and World Order: Semantic, Phonological, and Metrical Determinants of Serial Position
Mcdonald, J. L., Bock, K., & Kelly, M. H. (1993) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1993.1005 · Cited by 375
Naro, A. J. (1980) · Language · doi:10.2307/412648 · Cited by 354
Kamide, Y., Scheepers, C., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2003) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1023/a:1021933015362 · Cited by 327
“Long before short” preference in the production of a head-final language
Yamashita, H., & Chang, F. (2001) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00121-4 · Cited by 315
Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence
Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2007) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.014 · Cited by 310
Prat-Sala, M., & Branigan, H. P. (2000) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2668 · Cited by 308
Is It Better to Give Than to Donate? Syntactic Flexibility in Language Production
Ferreira, V. S. (1996) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0038 · Cited by 302
Stallings, L. M., MacDonald, M. C., & O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1998) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2586 · Cited by 301
The indirect object construction in English: an informational approach
COLLINS, P. (1995) · ling · doi:10.1515/ling.1995.33.1.35 · Cited by 293
Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English
Szmrecsanyi, B. (2005) · Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory · doi:10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.113 · Cited by 286
Argument-head distance and processing complexity: Explaining both locality and antilocality effects
Vasishth, S., & Lewis, R. L. (2006) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2006.0236 · Cited by 279
The Gradience of the Dative Alternation
Bresnan, J. W., & Nikitina, T. V. (2008) · Cited by 275
Self-citationConstituent Structure Is Formulated in One Stage
Pickering, M. J., Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2002) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2824 · Cited by 261
Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Tanaka, M. (2008) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.003 · Cited by 251
Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses
Gennari, S. P., & MacDonald, M. C. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.004 · Cited by 247
Locality and Parsing Complexity
Konieczny, L. (2000) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1023/a:1026528912821 · Cited by 245
Syntactic effects of information availability in sentence production
Kathryn Bock, J., & Irwin, D. E. (1980) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90321-7 · Cited by 237
HINRICHS, L., & SZMRECSANYI, B. (2007) · English Language and Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s1360674307002341 · Cited by 221
Animacy versus weight as determinants of grammatical variation in English
Rosenbach, A. (2005) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2005.0149 · Cited by 217
Towards a corpus-based identification of prototypical instances of constructions
Gries, S. T. (2003) · Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics · doi:10.1075/arcl.1.02gri · Cited by 214
A method for obtaining measures of local parsing complexity throughout sentences
Ford, M. (1983) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(83)90156-1 · Cited by 201
Self-citationClark, H. H. (1994) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/0167-6393(94)90075-2 · Cited by 193
Review of Baayen (2008): Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R.
Frank, A. F., & Jaeger, T. F. (2010) · Functions of Language · doi:10.1075/fol.17.1.08fra · Cited by 191
Somatosensory function in speech perception
Ito, T., Tiede, M., & Ostry, D. J. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0810063106 · Cited by 187
Semantic and Pragmatic Conditions for the Dative Alternation
Krifka, M. (2004) · Cited by 170
Entropy rate constancy in text
Genzel, D., & Charniak, E. (2001) · Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '02 · doi:10.3115/1073083.1073117 · Cited by 167
Animacy encoding in English: why and how
Zaenen, A., Carletta, J., Garretson, G., Bresnan, J., Koontz-Garboden, A., Nikitina, T., O'Connor, M. C., & Wasow, T. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2004 ACL Workshop on Discourse Annotation - DiscAnnotation '04 · doi:10.3115/1608938.1608954 · Cited by 166
Self-citationVerb seconding in Old English: verb movement to Infl
Pintzuk, S. (1993) · The Linguistic Review · doi:10.1515/tlir.1993.10.1.5 · Cited by 166
Minimization of dependency length in written English
Temperley, D. (2007) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.011 · Cited by 166
Green, G. M. (1982) · Language · doi:10.2307/413853 · Cited by 156
Number Agreement in British and American English: Disagreeing to Agree Collectively
Bock, K., Butterfield, S., Cutler, A., Cutting, J. C., Eberhard, K. M., & Humphreys, K. R. (2006) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2006.0011 · Cited by 156
ON THE PROBLEM OF SYNTACTIC VARIATION AND PRAGMATIC MEANING IN SOCIOLINGUISTIC THEORY
Romaine, S. E. (1984) · Folia Linguistica · doi:10.1515/flin.1984.18.3-4.409 · Cited by 154
The syntactic complexity of Russian relative clauses
Lévy, R., Fedorenko, E. G., & Gibson, E. A. F. (2013) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.10.005 · Cited by 150
Genitive Variation in English: Conceptual Factors in Synchronic and Diachronic Studies
Rosenbach, A. (2002) · Cited by 138
Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation in spontaneous speech
Tily, H. J., Gahl, S., Arnon, I., Snider, N., Kothari, A., & Bresnan, J. W. (2009) · Language and Cognition · doi:10.1515/langcog.2009.008 · Cited by 124
Self-citationOn operationalizing syntactic complexity
Szmrecsanyi, B., Purnelle, G., Fairon, G., & Dister, A. (2004) · Cited by 120
Auditory plasticity and speech motor learning
Nasir, S. M., & Ostry, D. J. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0907032106 · Cited by 108
Online syntactic storage costs in sentence comprehension
Chen, E., Gibson, E. A. F., & Wolf, F. (2004) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.10.001 · Cited by 108
End-Weight from the Speaker's Perspective
Wasow, T. (1997) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1023/a:1025080709112 · Cited by 101
Scrambled sentences in Japanese: Linguistic properties and motivations for production
Yamashita, H. (2002) · Text and Talk · doi:10.1515/text.2002.023 · Cited by 99
Acquiring lexical generalizations from corpora: a case study for diathesis alternations
Lapata, M. (1999) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1034678.1034740 · Cited by 90
Does Social Information Influence Sentence Processing
Casasanto, L. S. (2008) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 88
Processing typology and why psychologists need to know about it
Hawkins, J. A. (2007) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.02.003 · Cited by 86
Deshmukh, N., Ganapathiraju, A., Gleeson, A., Hamaker, J., & Picone, J. (1998) · International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) · doi:10.21437/icslp.1998-588 · Cited by 69
Keller, F. (2004) · Cited by 53
Lexical subjects and the conflation strategy
Michaelis, L. A., & Francis, H. S. (2007) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.155.04mic · Cited by 32
Scrambling in spoken Dutch: Definiteness versus weight as determinants of word order variation
van Bergen, G., & de Swart, P. (2010) · Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory · doi:10.1515/cllt.2010.010 · Cited by 29
Referring expressions in discourse
Smith, C. S. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615108.008 · Cited by 28
Bender, E. M. (2004) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2004.07.005 · Cited by 21
Similarity and structural priming
Snider, N., Taatgen, N., & van Rijn, H. (2009) · Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society · Cited by 20
Definiteness, Animacy, and NP Ordering
Ransom, E. N. (1977) · Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society · doi:10.3765/bls.v3i0.2243 · Cited by 18
Modelling the English dative alternation in varied written and spoken text
Theijssen, D. L., Oostdijk, N. H. J., van Halteren, H., & Boves, L. (2008) · Radboud Repository (Radboud University) · Cited by 1
Cited by
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108686136 · Cited by 623
Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives
Perek, F. (2015) · Constructional Approaches to Language · doi:10.1075/cal.17 · Cited by 417
COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretation
Kim, N., & Linzen, T. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.731 · Cited by 153
Listener sensitivity to probabilistic conditioning of sociolinguistic variables: The case of (ING)
Vaughn, C., & Kendall, T. (2018) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2018.07.006 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Bresnan, J., & Ford, M.
- Venue
- Language
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 168-213
- ISSN
- 0097-8507 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-0665
- OpenAlex
- W1969043111
- Cited by
- 613
- References
- 120
- FWCI
- 152.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
