CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 288Disability Rights and RepresentationFeminist Theory and Gender StudiesInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

Ten Principles of Disability Justice

Berne, Patricia, Morales, Aurora Levins, Langstaff, David, Invalid, Sins·2018·WSQ: Women's Studies Quarterly
DOI 10.1353/wsq.2018.0003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Ten Principles of Disability Justice1 Patricia Berne (bio), Aurora Levins Morales (bio), David Langstaff (bio), and Sins Invalid (bio) From within Sins Invalid, where we incubate both the framework and practice of Disability Justice, this burgeoning framework has ten (10) principles, each offering new opportunities for movement builders: 1. Intersectionality We know that each person has multiple identities, and that each identity can be a site of privilege or oppression. The mechanical workings of oppression and how they output shift depending upon the characteristics of any given institutional or interpersonal interaction; the very experience of disability itself is being shaped by race, gender, class, gender expression, historical moment, relationship to colonization, and more. 2. Leadership of Those Most Impacted We know ableism exists in the context of other historical systemic oppressions. We know to truly have liberation we must be led by those who know the most about these systems and how they work. 3. Anti-Capitalist Politic We are anti-capitalist as the very nature of our body/minds resist conforming to a capitalist "normative" level of production. We don't believe human worth is dependent on what and how much a person can produce. We critique a concept of "labor" as defined by able-bodied supremacy, white supremacy, and gender normativity. We understand capitalism to be a system that promotes private wealth accumulation for some at the expense of others. 4. Cross-Movement Solidarity Necessarily cross-movement, Disability Justice shifts how social justice movements understand disability and [End Page 227] contextualize ableism, lending itself toward a united front politic. 5. Recognizing Wholeness We value our people as they are, for who they are, and understand that people have inherent worth outside of capitalist notions of productivity. Each person is full of history and life experience. Each person has an internal experience composed of their own thoughts, sensations, emotions, fantasies, perceptions, and idiosyncrasies. Disabled people are whole people. 6. Sustainability We pace ourselves, individually and collectively, to be sustained long-term. We value the teachings of our lives and bodies. We understand that our embodied experience is a critical guide and reference pointing us toward justice and liberation. 7. Commitment to Cross-Disability Solidarity We value and honor the insights and participation of all of our community members. We are committed to breaking down ableist/patriarchal/racist/classed isolation between people with physical impairments, people who identify as "sick" or are chronically ill, "psych" survivors, and those who identify as "crazy," neurodiverse people, people with cognitive impairments, and people who are of a sensory minority, as we understand that isolation ultimately undermines collective liberation. 8. Interdependence Before the massive colonial project of Western European expansion, we understood the nature of interdependence within our communities. We see the liberation of all living systems and the land as integral to the liberation of our own communities, as we all share one planet. We attempt to meet each other's needs as we build toward liberation, without always reaching for state solutions which can readily extend its control further over our lives. 9. Collective Access As brown/black and queer crips, we bring flexibility and creative nuance to engage with each other. We create and explore new ways of doing things that go beyond able-bodied/minded normativity. Access needs aren't shameful—we all have various capacities which function differently in various environments. Access needs can be articulated within a community and met privately or through a collective, depending upon an individual's needs, desires, and the capacity of the group. We can share responsibility for our access needs, we can ask that our needs be met without compromising our integrity, we can balance autonomy while [End Page 228] being in community, we can be unafraid of our vulnerabilities knowing our strengths are respected. 10. Collective Liberation How do we move together as people with mixed abilities, multiracial, multi-gendered, mixed class, across the orientation spectrum—where no body/mind is left behind? This is Disability Justice, an honoring of the longstanding legacies of resilience and resistance which are the inheritance of all of us whose bodies or minds will not conform. Disability Justice is not yet a broad-based...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/wsq.2018.0003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Empowering technology at the community level would enhance visibility and engagement, foster solidarity, collective access, resource sharing, and self-determined interdependence among individuals.

    “Therefore, empowering technology at the community level would enhance visibility and engagement, foster solidarity, collective access, resource sharing, and self-determined interdependence among individuals, in line with the concept of networked empowerment [3] and Disability Justice [12, 39, 62].”

    From Rethinking “Empowering Technology” in Higher Education Accessibility: A Case Study of Disabled Students’ Experiences at a German University (2026) · cites this paper as [12]

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Berne, P., Morales, A. L., Langstaff, D., & Invalid, S.
ORCID
Invalid, Sins
Venue
WSQ: Women's Studies Quarterly
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2018
Volume
46
Issue
1-2
Pages
227-230
ISSN
  • 0732-1562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-1520
DOI
10.1353/wsq.2018.0003
OpenAlex
W2800367486
Cited by
288
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5
FWCI
13.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Women's studies quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
disability justice, disability rights, intersectionality, ableism, anti-capitalism, wholeness, sustainability, embodied experience, liberation, social justice movements, anti-oppression, neurodiversity, mental health stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review