CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 309Bone health and osteoporosis researchBone Metabolism and DiseasesEstrogen and related hormone effects

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of trabecular bone microarchitecture and remodeling in glucocorticoid-induced and postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Carbonare, L. Dalle, Arlot, M. E., Chavassieux, P. M., Roux, J. P., Portero, N. R., Meunier, P. J.·2001·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
DOI 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.1.97
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Long-term treatment with glucocorticoids (GCs) leads to a rapid bone loss and to a greater risk of fractures. To evaluate the specific effects of this treatment on cancellous bone remodeling, structure, and microarchitecture, we compared 22 transiliac biopsy specimens taken in postmenopausal women (65 ± 6 years) receiving GCs (≥7.5 mg/day, for at least 6 months) and 22 biopsy specimens taken in age-matched women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP), all untreated and having either at least one vertebral fracture or a T score < −2.5 SD. On these biopsy specimens, we measured static and dynamic parameters reflecting trabecular bone formation and resorption. Also, we performed the strut analysis and evaluated the trabecular bone pattern factor (TBPf), Euler number/tissue volume (E/TV), interconnectivity index (ICI), and marrow star volume (MaSV). Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP), when compared with PMOP, was characterized by lower bone volume (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), wall thickness (W.Th), osteoid thickness (O.Th), bone formation rate/bone surface (BFR/BS), adjusted mineral apposition rate/bone surface (Aj.AR/BS), and higher ICI and resorption parameters. After adjustment for BV/TV, the W.Th remained significantly lower in GIOP (p < 0.0001). The active formation period [FP(a+)] was not different. Patients with GIOP were divided into two groups: high cumulative dose GCs (HGCs; 23.7 ± 9.7 g) and low cumulative dose GCs (LGCs; 2.7 ± 1.2 g). HGC when compared with LGC was characterized by lower W.Th (p < 0.05), BV/TV (p < 0.001), Tb.Th (p < 0.05), trabecular number (Tb.N; p < 0.05), FP(a+) (p < 0.05), and nodes (p < 0.05), and higher E/TV (p < 0.05), ICI (p < 0.005), and TBPf (p < 0.05). When HGC was compared with PMOP, the results were similar except for the MaSV, which was significantly higher (p < 0.005). In summary, GIOP was characterized by lower formation and higher resorption than in PMOP, already present after LGC. With HGCs, these changes were associated with a more dramatic bone loss caused by a major loss of trabecular connectivity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.1.97

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Le, 1992, Computerized quantitative analysis of the interconnectivity of porous biomaterials, Acta Stereol, 11, 267
  2. Gallagher, 1996, Osteoporosis, 1191

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Carbonare, L. D., Arlot, M. E., Chavassieux, P. M., Roux, J. P., Portero, N. R., & Meunier, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unit 403 and Laboratoire d'Histodynamique Osseuse, Lyon, France
Corresponding author
Carbonare, L. Dalle
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2001-01-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
97-103
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
DOI
10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.1.97
OpenAlex
W1972567404
Cited by
309
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 16
FWCI
20.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
Locations
  • Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, postmenopausal osteoporosis, trabecular bone microarchitecture, bone remodeling, trabecular bone, bone formation rate, bone resorption, cumulative glucocorticoid dose, bone loss, trabecular thickness, wall thickness, Euler characteristic
MeSH terms
Aged, Biopsy, Bone and Bones, Female, Glucocorticoids, Histocytochemistry, Humans, Ilium, Middle Aged, Osteoporosis, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Bone Remodeling, Postmenopause

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review