The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of rotation and translation on the expected benefit of an ideal method to correct the eye’s higher-order aberrations
Abstract
An ideal correcting method, such as a customized contact lens, laser refractive surgery, or adaptive optics, that corrects higher-order aberrations as well as defocus and astigmatism could improve vision. The benefit achieved with this ideal method will be limited by decentration. To estimate the significance of this potential limitation we studied the effect on image quality expected when an ideal correcting method translates or rotates with respect to the eye's pupil. Actual wave aberrations were obtained from ten human eyes for a 7.3-mm pupil with a Shack-Hartmann sensor. We computed the residual aberrations that appear as a result of translation or rotation of an otherwise ideal correction. The model is valid for adaptive optics, contact lenses, and phase plates, but it constitutes only a first approximation to the laser refractive surgery case where tissue removal occurs. Calculations suggest that the typical decentrations will reduce only slightly the optical benefits expected from an ideal correcting method. For typical decentrations the ideal correcting method offers a benefit in modulation 2-4 times higher (1.5-2 times in white light) than with a standard correction of defocus and astigmatism. We obtained analytical expressions that show the impact of translation and rotation on individual Zernike terms. These calculations also reveal which aberrations are most beneficial to correct. We provided practical rules to implement a selective correction depending on the amount of decentration. An experimental study was performed with an aberrated artificial eye corrected with an adaptive optics system, validating the theoretical predictions. The results in a keratoconic subject, also corrected with adaptive optics, showed that important benefits are obtained despite decentrations in highly aberrated eyes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence*
Noll, R. J. (1976) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.66.000207 · Cited by 2,771
Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics
Liang, J., Williams, D. R., & Miller, D. T. (1997) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.14.002884 · Cited by 1,454
Self-citationLiang, J., Grimm, B., Goelz, S., & Bille, J. F. (1994) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.11.001949 · Cited by 1,195
Optical quality of the human eye
Campbell, F. W., & Gubisch, R. W. (1966) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008056 · Cited by 810
Aberrations and retinal image quality of the normal human eye
Liang, J., & Williams, D. R. (1997) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.14.002873 · Cited by 764
Self-citationA subjective method for the measurement of monochromatic* aberrations of the eye
Howland, H. C., & Howland, B. (1977) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.67.001508 · Cited by 379
Dynamics of the eye’s wave aberration
Hofer, H., Artal, P., Singer, B., Aragón, J. L., & Williams, D. R. (2001) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.18.000497 · Cited by 353
Self-citationAnalysis of the performance of the Hartmann–Shack sensor in the human eye
Prieto, P. M., Vargas-Martı́n, F., Goelz, S., & Artal, P. (2000) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.17.001388 · Cited by 298
Aliasing in human foveal vision
Williams, D. R. (1985) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(85)90113-0 · Cited by 277
Self-citationAverage optical performance of the human eye as a function of age in a normal population.
Guirao, A., González, C., Redondo, M., Geraghty, E., Norrby, S., & Artal, P. (1999) · PubMed · Cited by 274
Self-citation
Cited by
Meister, D. J., & Fisher, S. W. (2008) · Clinical and Experimental Optometry · doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00245.x · Cited by 114
Progress in the spectacle correction of presbyopia. Part 2: modern progressive lens technologies
Meister, D. J., & Fisher, S. W. (2008) · Clinical and Experimental Optometry · doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2008.00246.x · Cited by 87
Correction of presbyopia: old problems with old (and new) solutions
Kollbaum, P. S., & Bradley, A. (2020) · Clinical and Experimental Optometry · doi:10.1111/cxo.12987 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Guirao, A., Williams, D. R., & Cox, I. G.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America A
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2001-05-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1003
- ISSN
- 1084-7529 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8532
- OpenAlex
- W1985953097
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 8.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of rotation and translation on the expected benefit of an ideal method to correct the eye’s higher-order aberrations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/josaa.18.001003
- The paper
- Guirao, A., Williams, D. R., & Cox, I. G. (2001). Effect of rotation and translation on the expected benefit of an ideal method to correct the eye’s higher-order aberrations. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.18.001003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.