Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 231

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Squeezed light at 1550 nm with a quantum noise reduction of 123 dB

Open access
Mehmet, Moritz, Ast, Stefan, Eberle, Tobias, Steinlechner, Sebastian, Vahlbruch, Henning, Schnabel, Roman·2011·Optics Express

Abstract

Continuous-wave squeezed states of light at the wavelength of 1550 nm have recently been demonstrated, but so far the obtained factors of noise suppression still lag behind today's best squeezing values demonstrated at 1064 nm. Here we report on the realization of a half-monolithic nonlinear resonator based on periodically-poled potassium titanyl phosphate which enabled the direct detection of up to 12.3 dB of squeezing at 5 MHz. Squeezing was observed down to a frequency of 2 kHz which is well within the detection band of gravitational wave interferometers. Our results suggest that a long-term stable 1550 nm squeezed light source can be realized with strong squeezing covering the entire detection band of a 3rd generation gravitational-wave detector such as the Einstein Telescope.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/oe.19.025763

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Mehmet, 2010, Phys. Rev. A, 81, 013814, 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.013814 · DOI
  2. Eberle, 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett., 104, 251102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.251102 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Vahlbruch, 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, 011101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.011101 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Vahlbruch, 2007, New. J. Phys., 9, 371, 10.1088/1367-2630/9/10/371 · DOI
  5. Vahlbruch, 2010, Class. Quantum Grav., 27, 084027, 10.1088/0264-9381/27/8/084027 · DOI
  6. Harry, 2010, Class. Quantum Grav., 27, 084006, 10.1088/0264-9381/27/8/084006 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Schnabel, 2010, Nat. Commun., 1, 121, 10.1038/ncomms1122 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Rowan, 2005, Phys. Lett. A, 347, 25, 10.1016/j.physleta.2005.06.055 · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2005.06.055
  9. Schnabel, 2010, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 228, 012029, 10.1088/1742-6596/228/1/012029 · DOI
  10. Mehmet, 2009, Opt. Lett., 34, 1060, 10.1364/OL.34.001060 · DOI
  11. Mehmet, 2009, Opt. Lett., 35, 1665, 10.1364/OL.35.001665 · DOI
  12. Eberle, 2011, Phys. Rev. A, 83, 052329, 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.052329 · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.052329
  13. Aoki, 2006, Opt. Express, 14, 6930, 10.1364/OE.14.006930 · DOI
  14. Bowen, 2002, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclassical Opt., 4, 421, 10.1088/1464-4266/4/6/309 · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/4/6/309
  15. McKenzie, 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 161105, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.161105 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 231

Metadata

Authors
Mehmet, M., Ast, S., Eberle, T., Steinlechner, S., Vahlbruch, H., & Schnabel, R.
Venue
Optics Express
Published
2011-12-01
Volume
19
Issue
25
Pages
25763
ISSN
1094-4087 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061898774
Cited by
231
References
2
FWCI
12.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Squeezed light at 1550 nm with a quantum noise reduction of 123 dB. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/oe.19.025763
The paper
Mehmet, M., Ast, S., Eberle, T., Steinlechner, S., Vahlbruch, H., & Schnabel, R. (2011). Squeezed light at 1550 nm with a quantum noise reduction of 123 dB. Optics Express. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.19.025763

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.