The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ultrafast quantum random number generation based on quantum phase fluctuations
Open accessAbstract
A quantum random number generator (QRNG) can generate true randomness by exploiting the fundamental indeterminism of quantum mechanics. Most approaches to QRNG employ single-photon detection technologies and are limited in speed. Here, we experimentally demonstrate an ultrafast QRNG at a rate over 6 Gbits/s based on the quantum phase fluctuations of a laser operating near threshold. Moreover, we consider a potential adversary who has partial knowledge on the raw data and discuss how one can rigorously remove such partial knowledge with postprocessing. We quantify the quantum randomness through min-entropy by modeling our system and employ two randomness extractors--Trevisan's extractor and Toeplitz-hashing--to distill the randomness, which is information-theoretically provable. The simplicity and high-speed of our experimental setup show the feasibility of a robust, low-cost, high-speed QRNG.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“To overcome the bandwidth limitation of shot noise-limited homodyne detection, researchers have developed QRNGs based on measuring phase 40 -45 or intensity noise 46,47 of ampli fi ed spontaneous emission(ASE), which is quantum mechanical by nature. 15,48,49”
From Quantum random number generation (2016) · cites this paper as [42]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metropolis, N., & Ulam, S. (1949) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310 · Cited by 6,474
Theory of the linewidth of semiconductor lasers
Henry, C. (1982) · IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/jqe.1982.1071522 · Cited by 2,488
Single-photon detectors for optical quantum information applications
Hadfield, R. H. (2009) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.230 · Cited by 1,763
Random numbers certified by Bell’s theorem
Pironio, S., Acín, A., Massar, S., de la Giroday, A. B., Matsukevich, D. N., Maunz, P., Olmschenk, S., Hayes, D., Luo, L., Manning, T. A., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09008 · Cited by 1,420
New hash functions and their use in authentication and set equality
Wegman, M. N., & Carter, J. L. (1981) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-0000(81)90033-7 · Cited by 1,402
Fast physical random bit generation with chaotic semiconductor lasers
Uchida, A., Amano, K., Inoue, M., Hirano, K., Naito, S., Someya, H., Oowada, I., Kurashige, T., Shiki, M., Yoshimori, S., et al. (2008) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2008.227 · Cited by 1,024
TestU01: A C library for empirical testing of random number generators
L'Ecuyer, P., & Simard, R. (2007) · ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software · doi:10.1145/1268776.1268777 · Cited by 1,014
Quantum key distribution over a 40-dB channel loss using superconducting single-photon detectors
Takesue, H., Nam, S. W., Zhang, Q., Hadfield, R. H., Honjo, T., Tamaki, K., & Yamamoto, Y. (2007) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2007.75 · Cited by 749
An optical ultrafast random bit generator
Kanter, I., Aviad, Y., Reidler, I., Cohen, E., & Rosenbluh, M. (2009) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.235 · Cited by 505
A fast and compact quantum random number generator
Jennewein, T., Achleitner, U., Weihs, G., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A. (2000) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/1.1150518 · Cited by 434
Ultrahigh-Speed Random Number Generation Based on a Chaotic Semiconductor Laser
Reidler, I., Aviad, Y., Rosenbluh, M., & Kanter, I. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.024102 · Cited by 424
A generator for unique quantum random numbers based on vacuum states
Gabriel, C., Wittmann, C., Sych, D., Dong, R., Mauerer, W., Andersen, U. L., Marquardt, C., & Leuchs, G. (2010) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.197 · Cited by 419
Extractors and pseudorandom generators
(2001) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/502090.502099 · Cited by 324
High-speed quantum random number generation by measuring phase noise of a single-mode laser
Qi, B., Chi, Y.-M., Lo, H.-K., & Qian, L. (2010) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.35.000312 · Cited by 290
Self-citationReal time demonstration of high bitrate quantum random number generation with coherent laser light
Symul, T., Assad, S. M., & Lam, P. K. (2011) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.3597793 · Cited by 247
Fast physical random number generator using amplified spontaneous emission
Williams, C. R. S., Salevan, J. C., Li, X., Roy, R., & Murphy, T. E. (2010) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.18.023584 · Cited by 229
A high speed, postprocessing free, quantum random number generator
Dynes, J. F., Yuan, Z. L., Sharpe, A. W., & Shields, A. J. (2008) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.2961000 · Cited by 226
High speed optical quantum random number generation
Fürst, M., Weier, H., Nauerth, S., Marangon, D. G., Kurtsiefer, C., & Weinfurter, H. (2010) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.18.013029 · Cited by 200
Wahl, M., Leifgen, M., Berlin, M., Röhlicke, T., Rahn, H.-J., & Benson, O. J. (2011) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.3578456 · Cited by 197
Truly random number generation based on measurement of phase noise of a laser
Guo, H. M., Tang, W., Liu, Y., & Wei, W. (2010) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.81.051137 · Cited by 180
True random numbers from amplified quantum vacuum
Jofre, M., Curty, M., Steinlechner, F., Anzolin, G., Torres, J. P., Mitchell, M. W., & Pruneri, V. (2011) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.19.020665 · Cited by 180
Scalable parallel physical random number generator based on a superluminescent LED
Li, X., Cohen, A. B., Murphy, T. E., & Roy, R. (2011) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.36.001020 · Cited by 146
Low-bias high-speed quantum random number generator via shaped optical pulses
Wayne, M. A., & Kwiat, P. G. (2010) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.18.009351 · Cited by 123
Occupation fluctuation noise: A fundamental source of linewidth broadening in semiconductor lasers
Vahala, K. J., & Yariv, A. (1983) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.94260 · Cited by 62
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Shaltiel, 2002, Bull. Eur. Assoc. Theor. Comput. Sci., 77, 67
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum random number generators
Herrero-Collantes, M., & García-Escartín, J. C. (2017) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.015004 · Cited by 850
Quantum random number generation
Ma, X., Yuan, X., Cao, Z., Qi, B., & Zhang, Z. (2016) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/npjqi.2016.21 · Cited by 445
Self-citationIntrinsic randomness as a measure of quantum coherence
Yuan, X., Zhou, H., Cao, Z., & Ma, X. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.022124 · Cited by 401
Self-citationTang, Z., Liao, Z., Xu, F., Qi, B., Qian, L., & Lo, H.-K. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.190503 · Cited by 334
Self-citationRecent progress in quantum photonic chips for quantum communication and internet
Luo, W., Cao, L., Shi, Y., Wan, L., Zhang, H., Li, S., Chen, G., Li, Y., Li, S., Wang, Y., et al. (2023) · Light Science & Applications · doi:10.1038/s41377-023-01173-8 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, F., Qi, B., Ma, X., Xu, H., Zheng, H., & Lo, H.-K.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- Optics Express
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2012-05-16
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 12366
- ISSN
- 1094-4087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017636475
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 10.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Optics Express (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Random lasers and scattering media
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
- Keywords
- quantum random number generation, quantum phase fluctuations, min-entropy, randomness extractors, post-processing, true randomness
- MeSH terms
- Lasers, Mathematics, Quantum Theory, Random Allocation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review