Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental Demonstration of Polarization Encoding Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution

Tang, Zhiyuan, Liao, Zhongfa, Xu, Feihu, Qi, Bing, Qian, Li, Lo, Hoi-Kwong·2014·Physical Review Letters

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.112.190503

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Variations of the NS gate have been reported: one proposal using only two beam splitters but with a slightly lower success probability of (3 - √2)/7; other schemes with two ancillary photons with success probabilities 1/5 and 1/4.

    “Variations of the NS gate have been reported: one proposal shows the possibility to implement it using only two BS but with slightly lower success probability of (3 -√ 2)/7 [123]; other schemes with again two ancillary photons with success probabilities 1/5 [124] and 1/4 [125].”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [124]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. C. H. Bennett, 1984, IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing
  2. D. Gottesman, 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput., 4, 325, 10.26421/QIC4.5-1 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.057901 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230504 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230503 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.070502 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.010503 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.010505 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.042333 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.214 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/ncomms1348 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.110501 · DOI
  13. 10.1088/1367-2630/13/7/073024 · DOI
  14. 10.1088/1367-2630/12/11/113026 · DOI
  15. 10.1364/OE.20.018911 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.269 · DOI
  17. D. Mayers, 1998, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS98)
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.230501 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.070501 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.130503 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.042307 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.130501 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.052303 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1063/1.2432296 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.022308 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.130502 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1088/1367-2630/15/11/113007 · DOI
  28. 10.1088/1367-2630/11/9/095001 · DOI
  29. 10.1364/OE.16.011354 · DOI
  30. 10.1364/JOSAB.22.001749 · DOI
  31. 10.1364/JOSAB.19.002461 · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.052305 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.13 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tang, Z., Liao, Z., Xu, F., Qi, B., Qian, L., & Lo, H.-K.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2014-05-14
Volume
112
Issue
19
ISSN
  • 0031-9007
  • 1079-7114
Cited by
334
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review