Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrated silicon photonics for high-speed quantum key distribution

Sibson, Philip, Kennard, Jake E., Stanisic, Stasja, Erven, Chris, O’Brien, Jeremy L., Thompson, Mark G.·2017·Optica

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/optica.4.000172

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hong-Ou-Mandel interference between weak coherent states from two independent InP chips was observed with a visibility of 46.5±0.8%, and from two Si/III-V integrated lasers with a high visibility of 46±2%, where the maximal achievable visibility is 50%.

    “HOM interference between weak coherent states from two independent InP chips was observed with a visibility of 46.5±0.8% in ref. [70], and from two Si/III-V integrated lasers with a high visibility of 46±2% in ref. [71] (note maximal achievable visibility is 50%).”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [71]

  • Fully integrated QKD chips are readily achievable in the InP and Si/III-V platforms, promising miniaturized, low-cost devices for both quantum and classical communications.

    “Nevertheless, fully integrated QKD chips are readily achievable in the InP [37, 70] and Si/III-V platforms [71], promising miniaturized, low-costs devices allow for both quantum and classical communications.”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [71]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Lo, 2014, Nat. Photonics, 8, 595, 10.1038/nphoton.2014.149 · DOI
  2. Scarani, 2009, Rev. Mod. Phys., 81, 1301, 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1301 · DOI
  3. Yoshino, 2013, Opt. Express, 21, 31395, 10.1364/OE.21.031395 · DOI
  4. Korzh, 2013, Opt. Express, 21, 19579, 10.1364/OE.21.019579 · DOI
  5. Dixon, 2015, Opt. Express, 23, 7583, 10.1364/OE.23.007583 · DOI
  6. Sasaki, 2015, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 21, 49, 10.1109/JSTQE.2014.2369507 · DOI
  7. Thompson, 2011, IET Circuits Dev. Syst., 5, 94, 10.1049/iet-cds.2010.0108 · DOI
  8. Lim, 2014, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 20, 405, 10.1109/JSTQE.2013.2293274 · DOI
  9. Silverstone, 2016, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 22, 1, 10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2573218 · DOI
  10. Najafi, 2015, Nat. Commun., 6, 5873, 10.1038/ncomms6873 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Doerr, 2015, Front. Phys., 3, 37, 10.3389/fphy.2015.00037 · DOI
  12. Sun, 2015, Nature, 528, 534, 10.1038/nature16454 · DOI
  13. Zhang, 2014, Phys. Rev. Lett., 112, 130501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.130501 · DOI
  14. Tanaka, 2012, IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 48, 542, 10.1109/JQE.2012.2187327 · DOI
  15. Reed, 2010, Nat. Photonics, 4, 518, 10.1038/nphoton.2010.179 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Fang, 2012, ISRN Opt., 2012, 428690, 10.5402/2012/428690 · DOI
  17. Absil, 2015, Proc. SPIE, 9367, 93670V, 10.1117/12.2076262 · DOI
  18. Stucki, 2005, Appl. Phys. Lett., 87, 194108, 10.1063/1.2126792 · DOI
  19. Branciard, 2008, New J. Phys., 10, 013031, 10.1088/1367-2630/10/1/013031 · DOI
  20. Wang, 2016, Optica, 3, 407, 10.1364/OPTICA.3.000407 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Xavier, 2009, New J. Phys., 11, 045015, 10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/045015 · DOI
  22. Lo, 2007, Quantum Inf. Comput., 7, 431
  23. Ma, 2005, Phys. Rev. A, 72, 012326, 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.012326 · DOI
  24. Cardenas, 2014, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 26, 2380, 10.1109/LPT.2014.2357177 · DOI
  25. Cardenas, 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 4752, 10.1364/OE.17.004752 · DOI
  26. Liang, 2010, Nat. Photonics, 4, 511, 10.1038/nphoton.2010.167 · DOI
  27. Marsili, 2013, Nat. Photonics, 7, 210, 10.1038/nphoton.2013.13 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sibson, P., Kennard, J. E., Stanisic, S., Erven, C., O’Brien, J. L., & Thompson, M. G.
Venue
Optica
Published
2017-01-24
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
172
ISSN
2334-2536
Cited by
269
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  • European Research Council (ERC)
  • Seventh Framework Programme (FP7)
  • UK Quantum Communications Hub

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review