CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 156

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chip-to-chip quantum photonic interconnect by path-polarization interconversion

Wang, Jianwei, Bonneau, Damien, Villa, Matteo, Silverstone, Joshua W., Santagati, Raffaele, Miki, Shigehito, Yamashita, Taro, Fujiwara, Mikio, Sasaki, Masahide, Terai, Hirotaka, Tanner, Michael G., Natarajan, Chandra M., Hadfield, Robert H., O’Brien, Jeremy L., Thompson, Mark G.·2016·Optica
DOI 10.1364/optica.3.000407
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/optica.3.000407

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quantum phase estimation and variational eigensolver were implemented in IQP chips to compute the ground-state energy of molecules.

    “Quantum phase estimation [112] and variational eigensolver [79] were implemented in IQP chips to compute the ground-state energy of molecules ( Fig.5e ).”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [79]

  • A quantum variational eigensolver algorithm was implemented by combining a SiO2 photonic quantum processor with a classical computer, allowing estimations of ground-state energy and bond dissociation curve for the He-H+ molecule.

    “a quantum variational eigensolver algorithm is implemented by combining a SiO2 photonic quantum processor with a classical computer. It allows the estimations of ground-state energy and bond dissociation curve for the He-H + molecule.”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [79]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Gisin, 2007, Nat. Photonics, 1, 165, 10.1038/nphoton.2007.22 · DOI
  2. Yin, 2012, Nature, 488, 185, 10.1038/nature11332 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ma, 2012, Nature, 489, 269, 10.1038/nature11472 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Ursin, 2004, Nature, 430, 849, 10.1038/430849a · DOI · Paper page
  5. Fisher, 2014, Nat. Commun., 5, 3074, 10.1038/ncomms4074 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cirac, 1999, Phys. Rev. A, 59, 4249, 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.4249 · DOI
  7. Matthews, 2009, Nat. Photonics, 3, 346, 10.1038/nphoton.2009.93 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Crespi, 2012, Appl. Phys. Lett., 100, 233704, 10.1063/1.4724105 · DOI
  9. Nagata, 2007, Science, 316, 726, 10.1126/science.1138007 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Nickerson, 2014, Phys. Rev. X, 4, 041041
  11. Kieling, 2007, Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, 130501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.130501 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Segovia, 2015, Phys. Rev. Lett., 115, 020502, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.020502 · DOI
  13. Horn, 2012, Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, 153605, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.153605 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Clemmen, 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 16558, 10.1364/OE.17.016558 · DOI
  15. Politi, 2008, Science, 320, 646, 10.1126/science.1155441 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Shadbolt, 2012, Nat. Photonics, 6, 45, 10.1038/nphoton.2011.283 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Silverstone, 2014, Nat. Photonics, 8, 104, 10.1038/nphoton.2013.339 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Silverstone, 2015, Nat. Commun., 6, 7948, 10.1038/ncomms8948 · DOI
  19. Tanzilli, 2012, Laser Photon. Rev., 6, 115, 10.1002/lpor.201100010 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Metcalf, 2014, Nat. Photonics, 8, 770, 10.1038/nphoton.2014.217 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Najafi, 2015, Nat. Commun., 6, 5873, 10.1038/ncomms6873 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Harris, 2014, Phys. Rev. X, 4, 041047
  23. Meany, 2014, Laser Photon. Rev., 8, L42, 10.1002/lpor.201400027 · DOI
  24. Li, 2009, Adv. Opt. Photon., 1, 279, 10.1364/AOP.1.000279 · DOI
  25. Wang, 2015, Nature, 518, 516, 10.1038/nature14246 · DOI
  26. D’Ambrosio, 2012, Nat. Commun., 3, 961, 10.1038/ncomms1951 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Inagaki, 2013, Opt. Express, 21, 23241, 10.1364/OE.21.023241 · DOI
  28. Hübel, 2007, Opt. Express, 15, 7853, 10.1364/OE.15.007853 · DOI
  29. Matsuda, 2012, Sci. Rep., 2, 817, 10.1038/srep00817 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Olislager, 2013, Opt. Lett., 38, 1960, 10.1364/OL.38.001960 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Taillaert, 2003, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 15, 1249, 10.1109/LPT.2003.816671 · DOI
  32. Dai, 2014, Nanophotonics, 3, 283, 10.1515/nanoph-2013-0021 · DOI
  33. Cai, 2012, Science, 338, 363, 10.1126/science.1226528 · DOI
  34. Bonneau, 2012, New J. Phys., 14, 045003, 10.1088/1367-2630/14/4/045003 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Miki, 2013, Opt. Express, 21, 10208, 10.1364/OE.21.010208 · DOI
  36. Zaoui, 2013, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 25, 1395, 10.1109/LPT.2013.2266132 · DOI
  37. Rarity, 1990, Phys. Rev. Lett., 64, 2495, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2495 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Bartkiewicz, 2013, Phys. Rev. A, 88, 052105, 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.052105 · DOI
  39. Weihs, 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, 5039, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5039 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Fickler, 2014, Nat. Commun., 5, 4502, 10.1038/ncomms5502 · DOI
  41. Strain, 2014, Nat. Commun., 5, 4856, 10.1038/ncomms5856 · DOI
  42. Xiong, 2015, Optica, 2, 724, 10.1364/OPTICA.2.000724 · DOI
  43. Grassani, 2015, Optica, 2, 88, 10.1364/OPTICA.2.000088 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Sun, 2013, Nature, 493, 195, 10.1038/nature11727 · DOI
  45. Han, 2015, Optica, 2, 370, 10.1364/OPTICA.2.000370 · DOI
  46. Bogaerts, 2005, J. Lightwave Technol., 23, 401, 10.1109/JLT.2004.834471 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, J., Bonneau, D., Villa, M., Silverstone, J. W., Santagati, R., Miki, S., Yamashita, T., Fujiwara, M., Sasaki, M., Terai, H., Tanner, M. G., Natarajan, C. M., Hadfield, R. H., O’Brien, J. L., & Thompson, M. G.
Venue
Optica
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2016-04-13
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
407
ISSN
2334-2536
DOI
10.1364/optica.3.000407
Cited by
156
References
11
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  • European Research Council (ERC)
  • Photonic Integrated Compound Quantum Encoding (PICQUE)
  • FP7 Action: Beyond the Barriers of Optical Integration (BBOI)
  • PHORBITECH
  • QUANTIP
  • Army Research Office (ARO) (W911NF-14-1-0133)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR)
  • ImPACT Program of the Cabinet Office Japan
  • Centre for Nanoscience and Quantum Information (NSQI)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  • Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship
  • Royal Society Wolfson Merit Award
  • Royal Academy of Engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review