Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Math learning disorder: incidence in a population-based birth cohort, 1976-82, Rochester, Minn

Barbaresi, William J., Katusic, Slavica K., Colligan, Robert C., Weaver, Amy L., Jacobsen, Steven J.·2005·Ambulatory Pediatrics
DOI 10.1367/a04-209r.1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1367/a04-209r.1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Rourke, 1997, Disabilities of arithmetic and mathematical reasoning: perspectives from neurology and neurolopsychology, J Learn Disabil, 30, 34, 10.1177/002221949703000103 · DOI
  2. Kulak, 1993, Parallels between math and reading disability: common issues and approaches, J Learn Disabil, 26, 666, 10.1177/002221949302601004 · DOI
  3. Lewis, 1994, The prevalence of specific arithmetic difficulties and specific reading difficulties in 9- to 10-year-old boys and girls, J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 33, 283, 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01162.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. O'Hare, 1991, Dyscalculia in children, Dev Med Child Neurol, 33, 356, 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1991.tb14888.x · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1991.tb14888.x
  5. Ginsburg, 1997, Mathematics learning disabilities: a view from developmental psychology, J Learn Disabil, 30, 20, 10.1177/002221949703000102 · DOI
  6. Alarcon, 1997, A twin study of mathematics disability, J Learn Disabil, 30, 617, 10.1177/002221949703000605 · DOI
  7. Knopik, 1997, Comorbidity of mathematics and reading deficits: evidence for a genetic etiology, Behav Genet, 27, 447, 10.1023/A:1025622400239 · DOI
  8. Gross-Tsur, 1998, Developmental dyscalculia: prevalence and demographic features, Dev Med Child Neurol, 38, 25, 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1996.tb15029.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. Shalev, 1998, Persistence of developmental dyscalculia: what counts?, J Pediatr, 133, 358, 10.1016/S0022-3476(98)70269-0 · DOI
  10. Kosc, 1974, Developmental dyscalculia, J Learn Disabil, 7, 164, 10.1177/002221947400700309 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Shalev, 2000, Developmental dyscalculia: prevalence and prognosis, Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 9, 58, 10.1007/s007870070009 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Shalev, 2001, Developmental dyscalculia, Pediatr Neurol, 24, 337, 10.1016/S0887-8994(00)00258-7 · DOI
  13. Rourke, 1993, Arithmetic disabilities, specific and otherwise: a neuropsychological perspective, J Learn Disabil, 26, 214, 10.1177/002221949302600402 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Geary, 1993, Mathematical disabilities: cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components, Psychol Bull, 114, 345, 10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.345 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.345 · Paper page
  15. Batchelor, 1989, Neuropsychology of childhood arithmetic disorders, Int J Neurosci, 44, 27, 10.3109/00207458908986180 · doi:10.3109/00207458908986180
  16. Katusic, 1998, Potential influence of migration bias in birth cohort studies, Mayo Clin Proc, 73, 1053, 10.4065/73.11.1053 · DOI
  17. Shaywitz, 1992, Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability, N Engl J Med, 326, 145, 10.1056/NEJM199201163260301 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Kaplan, 1958, Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations, J Am Stat Assoc, 53, 457, 10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Cruickshank, 1984, Definition: a major issue in the field of learning disabilities, J Rehabil, 50, 7
  20. Lester, 1997, State disparities in the diagnosis and placement of pupils with learning disabilities, J Learn Disabil, 30, 599, 10.1177/002221949703000603 · DOI
  21. Mercer, 1996, Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments, Learn Disabil Q J Council Learn Disabil, 19, 217, 10.2307/1511208 · DOI
  22. Morris, 1994, Proposed guidelines and criteria for describing samples of persons with learning disabilties, Learn Disabil Q J Council Learn Disabil, 17, 105
  23. Lyon, 1996, Learning disabilities, Future Child, 6, 54, 10.2307/1602494 · DOI
  24. Fletcher, 1994, Cognitive profiles of reading disability: comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions, J Educ Psychol, 86, 6, 10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.6 · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.6 · Paper page
  25. Fletcher, 1998, Intelligent testing and the discrepancy model for children with learning disabilities, Learn Disabil Res Pract, 13, 186
  26. Light, 1995, Comorbidity of reading and mathematics disabilities: genetic and environmental etiologies, J Learn Disabil, 28, 96, 10.1177/002221949502800204 · DOI
  27. Shaywitz, 1990, Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls; results of the Connecticut Longitudinal Study, JAMA, 264, 998, 10.1001/jama.1990.03450080084036 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Knopik, 1999, Etiology of covariation between reading and mathematics performance, Twin Res, 2, 226, 10.1375/twin.2.3.226 · doi:10.1375/twin.2.3.226

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Barbaresi, W. J., Katusic, S. K., Colligan, R. C., Weaver, A. L., & Jacobsen, S. J.
Venue
Ambulatory Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
281-289
ISSN
1530-1567
DOI
10.1367/a04-209r.1
Cited by
198
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.