Cited by 58Health Policy Implementation ScienceMental Health Treatment and AccessPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Care management for depression in primary care practice: findings from the RESPECT-depression trial

Open access
Nutting, P. A., Gallagher, K., Riley, K., White, S., Dickinson, W. P., Korsen, N., Dietrich, A.·2008·The Annals of Family Medicine

Abstract

PURPOSE: This qualitative study examined the barriers to adopting depression care management among 42 primary care clinicians in 30 practices. METHODS: The RESPECT-Depression trial worked collaboratively with 5 large health care organizations (and 60 primary care practices) to implement and disseminate an evidence-based intervention. This study used semistructured interviews with 42 primary care clinicians from 30 practice sites, 18 care managers, and 7 mental health professionals to explore experience and perceptions with depression care management for patients. Subject selection in 4 waves of interviews was driven by themes emerging from ongoing data analysis. RESULTS: Primary care clinicians reported broad appreciation of the benefits of depression care management for their patients. Lack of reimbursement and the competing demands of primary care were often cited as barriers. These clinicians at many levels of initial enthusiasm for care management increased their enthusiasm after experiencing care management through the project. Psychiatric oversight of the care manager with suggestions for the clinicians was widely seen as important and appropriate by clinicians, care managers, and psychiatrists. Clinicians and care managers emphasized the importance of establishing effective communication among themselves, as well as maintaining a consistent and continuous relationship with the patients. The clinicians were selective in which patients they referred for care management, and there was wide variation in opinion about which patients were optimal candidates. Care managers were able to operate both from within a practice and more centrally when specific attention was given to negotiating communication strategies with a clinician. CONCLUSIONS: Care management for depression is an attractive option for most primary care clinicians. Lack of reimbursement remains the single greatest obstacle to more widespread adoption.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1370/afm.742

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bachman J, Pincus HA, Houtsinger JK, Unutzer J. Funding mecha- nisms for depression care management: opportunities and chal- lenges. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006;28(4):278-288.
  2. Boudreau DM, Capoccia KL, Sullivan SD, et al. Collaborative care model to improve outcomes in major depression. Ann Pharmacother. 2002;36(4):585-591.
  3. Hunkeler EM, Meresman JF, Hargreaves WA, et al. Effi cacy of nurse telehealth care and peer support in augmenting treatment of depression in primary care. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(8):700-708.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nutting, P. A., Gallagher, K., Riley, K., White, S., Dickinson, W. P., Korsen, N., & Dietrich, A.
Affiliations
  • Center for Research Strategies (US)
  • University of Colorado Health (US)
  • Maine Medical Center (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
Venue
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2008-01-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
30-37
ISSN
  • 1544-1709 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-1717
OpenAlex
W2140623211
Cited by
58
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 10
FWCI
11.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
depression care management, primary care providers, barriers to adoption, reimbursement, referral, implementation of evidence-based interventions
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Depression, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Interviews as Topic, Patient Care Management, Patient Compliance, Physician-Patient Relations, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Primary Health Care, Reimbursement, Incentive, Time Factors, Workload, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review