The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subversion of Cellular Autophagosomal Machinery by RNA Viruses
Open accessAbstract
Infection of human cells with poliovirus induces the proliferation of double-membraned cytoplasmic vesicles whose surfaces are used as the sites of viral RNA replication and whose origin is unknown. Here, we show that several hallmarks of cellular autophagosomes can be identified in poliovirus-induced vesicles, including colocalization of LAMP1 and LC3, the human homolog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Atg8p, and staining with the fluorophore monodansylcadaverine followed by fixation. Colocalization of LC3 and LAMP1 was observed early in the poliovirus replicative cycle, in cells infected with rhinoviruses 2 and 14, and in cells that express poliovirus proteins 2BC and 3A, known to be sufficient to induce double-membraned vesicles. Stimulation of autophagy increased poliovirus yield, and inhibition of the autophagosomal pathway by 3-methyladenine or by RNA interference against mRNAs that encode two different proteins known to be required for autophagy decreased poliovirus yield. We propose that, for poliovirus and rhinovirus, components of the cellular machinery of autophagosome formation are subverted to promote viral replication. Although autophagy can serve in the innate immune response to microorganisms, our findings are inconsistent with a role for the induced autophagosome-like structures in clearance of poliovirus. Instead, we argue that these double-membraned structures provide membranous supports for viral RNA replication complexes, possibly enabling the nonlytic release of cytoplasmic contents, including progeny virions, from infected cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast Apg8p, is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing.
Kabeya, Y., Mizushima, N., Ueno, T., Yamamoto, A., Kirisako, T., Noda, T., Kominami, E., Ohsumi, Y., & Yoshimori, T. (2000) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/19.21.5720 · Cited by 6,605
Gutierrez, M. G., Master, S. S., Singh, S. B., Taylor, G. A., Colombo, M. I., & Deretic, V. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.038 · Cited by 2,252
He, H., Dang, Y., Dai, F., Guo, Z., Wu, J., She, X., Pei, Y., Chen, Y., Ling, W., Wu, C., et al. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m303800200 · Cited by 273
Fengsrud, M., Erichsen, E. S., Berg, T. O., Raiborg, C., & Seglen, P. O. (2000) · European Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1078/0171-9335-00125 · Cited by 123
Research works printed but not linked: 89
- Dales, 1965, Virology, 26, 379, 10.1016/0042-6822(65)90001-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Schlegel, 1996, J Virol, 70, 6576, 10.1128/JVI.70.10.6576-6588.1996 · DOI · Paper page
- Bienz, 1987, Virology, 60, 220, 10.1016/0042-6822(87)90063-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Cho, 1994, Virology, 202, 129, 10.1006/viro.1994.1329 · DOI · Paper page
- Egger, 2000, J Virol, 74, 6570, 10.1128/JVI.74.14.6570-6580.2000 · DOI · Paper page
- Lyle, 2002, Science, 296, 2218, 10.1126/science.1070585 · DOI · Paper page
- Chen, 2003, J Virol, 77, 2568, 10.1128/JVI.77.4.2568-2577.2003 · DOI
- Levine, 2004, Dev Cell, 6, 463, 10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00099-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Bursch, 2000, J Cell Sci, 113, 1189, 10.1242/jcs.113.7.1189 · DOI · Paper page
- Bilir, 2001, Pathobiology, 69, 120, 10.1159/000048766 · DOI
- Blommaart, 1995, J Biol Chem, 270, 2320, 10.1074/jbc.270.5.2320 · DOI · Paper page
- Shigemitsu, 1999, J Biol Chem, 274, 1058, 10.1074/jbc.274.2.1058 · DOI · Paper page
- Mordier, 2000, J Biol Chem, 275, 29900, 10.1074/jbc.M003633200 · DOI · Paper page
- Meijer, 2004, Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 36, 2445, 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
- Wang, 2003, Mol Med, 9, 65, 10.1007/BF03402040 · DOI · Paper page
- Kim, 2000, Annu Rev Biochem, 69, 303, 10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.303 · DOI · Paper page
- Tanida, 2002, J Biol Chem, 277, 13739, 10.1074/jbc.M200385200 · DOI · Paper page
- Cuervo, 2004, Mol Cell Biochem, 263, 55, 10.1023/B:MCBI.0000041848.57020.57 · DOI · Paper page
- Klionsky, 2005, J Cell Sci, 118, 7, 10.1242/jcs.01620 · DOI · Paper page
- Mizushima, 2002, Cell Struct Funct, 27, 421, 10.1247/csf.27.421 · DOI · Paper page
- Stromhaug, 1998, Biochem J, 335, 217, 10.1042/bj3350217 · DOI · Paper page
- Mizushima, 2001, J Cell Biol, 152, 657, 10.1083/jcb.152.4.657 · DOI · Paper page
- Dunn, 1990, J Cell Biol, 110, 1923, 10.1083/jcb.110.6.1923 · DOI · Paper page
- Dunn, 1990, J Cell Biol, 110, 1935, 10.1083/jcb.110.6.1935 · DOI · Paper page
- Tanaka, 2000, Nature, 406, 902, 10.1038/35022595 · DOI · Paper page
- Eskelinen, 2002, Traffic, 3, 878, 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2002.31204.x · DOI · Paper page
- Niioka, 1998, J Biochem, 124, 1086, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022225 · DOI
- Tershak, 1984, J Virol, 52, 777, 10.1128/JVI.52.3.777-783.1984 · DOI
- Rust, 2001, J Virol, 75, 9808, 10.1128/JVI.75.20.9808-9818.2001 · DOI · Paper page
- Gazina, 2002, J Virol, 76, 11113, 10.1128/JVI.76.21.11113-11122.2002 · DOI
- Irurzun, 1992, Virology, 191, 166, 10.1016/0042-6822(92)90178-R · doi:10.1016/0042-6822(92)90178-r
- Maynell, 1992, J Virol, 66, 1985, 10.1128/JVI.66.4.1985-1994.1992 · DOI
- Suhy, 2000, J Virol, 74, 8953, 10.1128/JVI.74.19.8953-8965.2000 · DOI · Paper page
- Doedens, 1997, J Virol, 71, 9054, 10.1128/JVI.71.12.9054-9064.1997 · DOI · Paper page
- Ishihara, 2001, Mol Biol Cell, 12, 3690, 10.1091/mbc.12.11.3690 · DOI · Paper page
- Reggiori, 2002, Eukaryot Cell, 1, 11, 10.1128/EC.01.1.11-21.2002 · DOI · Paper page
- Hamasaki, 2003, Cell Struct Funct, 28, 49, 10.1247/csf.28.49 · DOI
- Rowe, 1996, J Cell Biol, 135, 895, 10.1083/jcb.135.4.895 · DOI · Paper page
- Aridor, 1999, J Biol Chem, 274, 4389, 10.1074/jbc.274.7.4389 · DOI
- Dorn, 2002, Cell Microbiol, 4, 1, 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2002.00164.x · DOI · Paper page
- Kirkegaard, 2004, Nat Rev Microbiol, 2, 301, 10.1038/nrmicro865 · DOI · Paper page
- Talloczy, 2002, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 99, 190, 10.1073/pnas.012485299 · DOI · Paper page
- Nakagawa, 2004, Science, 306, 1037, 10.1126/science.1103966 · DOI · Paper page
- Mizushima, 2004, Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 36, 2491, 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
- Mann, 1994, J Biol Chem, 269, 11492, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)78150-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Munafo, 2001, J Cell Sci, 114, 3619, 10.1242/jcs.114.20.3619 · DOI · Paper page
- Munafo, 2002, Traffic, 3, 472, 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2002.30704.x · DOI · Paper page
- Baltimore, 1966, J Virol, 29, 179, 10.1016/0042-6822(66)90024-9 · DOI
- Aldabe, 1995, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 206, 64, 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1010 · doi:10.1006/bbrc.1995.1010
- Teterina, 1997, J Virol, 71, 8962, 10.1128/JVI.71.12.8962-8972.1997 · DOI · Paper page
- Doedens, 1995, EMBO J, 14, 894, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07071.x · DOI · Paper page
- Biederbick, 1995, Eur J Cell Biol, 66, 3
- Niemann, 2000, J Histochem Cytochem, 48, 251, 10.1177/002215540004800210 · DOI
- Seglen, 1982, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 79, 1889, 10.1073/pnas.79.6.1889 · DOI · Paper page
- Baehrecke, 2003, Cell Death Differ, 10, 940, 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401280 · DOI · Paper page
- Edinger, 2004, Curr Opin Cell Biol, 16, 663, 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.09.011 · DOI · Paper page
- Pfister, 1995, J Gen Virol, 76, 63, 10.1099/0022-1317-76-1-63 · DOI
- Nugent, 1999, J Virol, 73, 427, 10.1128/JVI.73.1.427-435.1999 · DOI · Paper page
- Pedersen, 1999, J Virol, 73, 2016, 10.1128/JVI.73.3.2016-2026.1999 · DOI · Paper page
- Gosert, 2002, J Virol, 76, 3697, 10.1128/JVI.76.8.3697-3708.2002 · DOI · Paper page
- Goldsmith, 2004, Emerg Infect Dis, 10, 320, 10.3201/eid1002.030913 · DOI · Paper page
- Prentice, 2004, J Biol Chem, 279, 10136, 10.1074/jbc.M306124200 · DOI · Paper page
- Snijder, 2001, J Gen Virol, 82, 985, 10.1099/0022-1317-82-5-985 · DOI · Paper page
- Ogawa, 2005, Science, 307, 727, 10.1126/science.1106036 · DOI · Paper page
- Best, 2003, J Virol, 77, 5305, 10.1128/JVI.77.9.5305-5312.2003 · DOI
- Saederup, 2002, J Virol, 75, 9966, 10.1128/JVI.75.20.9966-9976.2001 · DOI
- Swanson, 1995, Infect Immun, 63, 3609, 10.1128/IAI.63.9.3609-3620.1995 · DOI · Paper page
- Swanson, 1996, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 797, 8, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb52944.x · DOI
- Joshi, 2001, Cell Microbiol, 3, 99, 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2001.00093.x · DOI
- Miller, 2003, J Virol, 77, 12193, 10.1128/JVI.77.22.12193-12202.2003 · doi:10.1128/jvi.77.22.12193-12202.2003
- Colbere-Garapin, 1989, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 86, 7590, 10.1073/pnas.86.19.7590 · DOI
- Lloyd, 1993, Virol, 194, 200, 10.1006/viro.1993.1250 · DOI
- Zhang, 1997, Virol, 235, 293, 10.1006/viro.1997.8692 · DOI
- Pavio, 2000, Virology, 274, 331, 10.1006/viro.2000.0462 · DOI
- Tucker, 1993, J Virol, 67, 4274, 10.1128/JVI.67.7.4274-4282.1993 · doi:10.1128/jvi.67.7.4274-4282.1993
- Newman, 1973, J Gen Virol, 18, 171, 10.1099/0022-1317-18-2-171 · doi:10.1099/0022-1317-18-2-171
- Piirainen, 1998, Microb Pathog, 25, 131, 10.1006/mpat.1998.0221 · doi:10.1006/mpat.1998.0221
- Pelchin-Matthews, 2003, J Cell Biol, 162, 443, 10.1083/jcb.200304008 · DOI · Paper page
- Nydegger, 2003, Traffic, 4, 902, 10.1046/j.1600-0854.2003.00145.x · DOI · Paper page
- Ono, 2004, J Virol, 78, 1552, 10.1128/JVI.78.3.1552-1563.2004 · DOI · Paper page
- Goff, 2003, J Virol, 77, 9173, 10.1128/JVI.77.17.9173-9182.2003 · DOI
- Poornillos, 2003, J Cell Biol, 162, 425, 10.1083/jcb.200302138 · DOI · Paper page
- Katzmann, 2003, J Cell Biol, 160, 413, 10.1083/jcb.200302136 · DOI · Paper page
- Bache, 2003, J Cell Biol, 162, 435, 10.1083/jcb.200302131 · DOI · Paper page
- Stuchell, 2004, J Biol Chem, 279, 36059, 10.1074/jbc.M405226200 · DOI · Paper page
- Racaniello, 1981, Science, 214, 916, 10.1126/science.6272391 · DOI · Paper page
- Subauste, 1995, J Clin Invest, 96, 549, 10.1172/JCI118067 · DOI · Paper page
- Takizawa, 1993, Cell, 73, 1079, 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90638-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Cole, 1996, Mol Biol Cell, 7, 631, 10.1091/mbc.7.4.631 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
The Molecular Biology of Coronaviruses
Masters, P. S. (2006) · Advances in Virus Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-3527(06)66005-3 · Cited by 1,761
Emerging regulation and functions of autophagy
Boya, P., Reggiori, F., & Codogno, P. (2013) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2788 · Cited by 1,216
Macroautophagy—a novel β-amyloid peptide-generating pathway activated in Alzheimer's disease
Yu, W. H., Cuervo, A. M., Kumar, A., Peterhoff, C. M., Schmidt, S. D., Lee, J.-H., Mohan, P. S., Mercken, M., Farmery, M. R., Tjernberg, L. O., et al. (2005) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200505082 · Cited by 967
Autophagy during viral infection — a double-edged sword
Choi, Y., Bowman, J. W., & Jung, J. U. (2018) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-018-0003-6 · Cited by 838
Distinct fission signatures predict mitochondrial degradation or biogenesis.
Kleele, T., Rey, T., Winter, J., Zaganelli, S., Mahecic, D., Perreten Lambert, H., Ruberto, F. P., Nemir, M., Wai, T., Pedrazzini, T., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03510-6 · Cited by 794
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, W. T., Giddings, T. H., Taylor, M. P., Mulinyawe, S., Rabinovitch, M., Kopito, R. R., & Kirkegaard, K.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2005-04-26
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e156
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2079046408
- Cited by
- 818
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 20.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subversion of Cellular Autophagosomal Machinery by RNA Viruses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030156
- The paper
- Jackson, W. T., Giddings, T. H., Taylor, M. P., Mulinyawe, S., Rabinovitch, M., Kopito, R. R., & Kirkegaard, K. (2005). Subversion of Cellular Autophagosomal Machinery by RNA Viruses. PLoS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030156
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.