The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interdigitated Paralemniscal and Lemniscal Pathways in the Mouse Barrel Cortex
Open accessAbstract
Primary sensory cortical areas receive information through multiple thalamic channels. In the rodent whisker system, lemniscal and paralemniscal thalamocortical projections, from the ventral posteromedial nucleus (VPM) and posterior medial nucleus (POm) respectively, carry distinct types of sensory information to cortex. Little is known about how these separate streams of activity are parsed and integrated within the neocortical microcircuit. We used quantitative laser scanning photostimulation to probe the organization of functional thalamocortical and ascending intracortical projections in the mouse barrel cortex. To map the thalamocortical projections, we recorded from neocortical excitatory neurons while stimulating VPM or POm. Neurons in layers (L)4, L5, and L6A received dense input from thalamus (L4, L5B, and L6A from VPM; and L5A from POm), whereas L2/3 neurons rarely received thalamic input. We further mapped the lemniscal and paralemniscal circuits from L4 and L5A to L2/3. Lemniscal L4 neurons targeted L3 within a column. Paralemniscal L5A neurons targeted a superficial band (thickness, 60 mum) of neurons immediately below L1, defining a functionally distinct L2 in the mouse barrel cortex. L2 neurons received input from lemniscal L3 cells and paralemniscal L5A cells spread over multiple columns. Our data indicate that lemniscal and paralemniscal information is segregated into interdigitated cortical layers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Circuit analysis of experience-dependent plasticity in the developing rat barrel cortex
Shepherd, G. M. G., Pologruto, T. A., & Svoboda, K. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00152-1 · Cited by 322
Self-citationFeldmeyer, D., Roth, A., & Sakmann, B. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5227-04.2005 · Cited by 146
Cited by
The subcellular organization of neocortical excitatory connections
Petreanu, L., Mao, T., Sternson, S. M., & Svoboda, K. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07709 · Cited by 1,047
Self-citationChannelrhodopsin-2-assisted circuit mapping of long-range callosal projections
Petreanu, L., Huber, D., Sobczyk, A., & Svoboda, K. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1891 · Cited by 930
Self-citationThe excitatory neuronal network of the C2 barrel column in mouse primary somatosensory cortex
Lefort, S., Tomm, C., Floyd Sarria, J.-C., & Petersen, C. C. H. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.020 · Cited by 875
Parallel processing strategies of the primate visual system
Nassi, J. J., & Callaway, E. M. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2619 · Cited by 802
The Functional Organization of the Barrel Cortex
Petersen, C. C. H. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.017 · Cited by 732
Metadata
- Authors
- Bureau, I., von Saint Paul, F., & Svoboda, K.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2006-11-21
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e382
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2042598466
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.