The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Auditory Cortex Tracks Both Auditory and Visual Stimulus Dynamics Using Low-Frequency Neuronal Phase Modulation
Open accessAbstract
Integrating information across sensory domains to construct a unified representation of multi-sensory signals is a fundamental characteristic of perception in ecological contexts. One provocative hypothesis deriving from neurophysiology suggests that there exists early and direct cross-modal phase modulation. We provide evidence, based on magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings from participants viewing audiovisual movies, that low-frequency neuronal information lies at the basis of the synergistic coordination of information across auditory and visual streams. In particular, the phase of the 2-7 Hz delta and theta band responses carries robust (in single trials) and usable information (for parsing the temporal structure) about stimulus dynamics in both sensory modalities concurrently. These experiments are the first to show in humans that a particular cortical mechanism, delta-theta phase modulation across early sensory areas, plays an important "active" role in continuously tracking naturalistic audio-visual streams, carrying dynamic multi-sensory information, and reflecting cross-sensory interaction in real time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · Cited by 8,388
Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35084005 · Cited by 6,551
Hearing lips and seeing voices
MCGURK, H., & MACDONALD, J. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/264746a0 · Cited by 6,183
The cortical organization of speech processing
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2113 · Cited by 5,495
Self-citationA mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence.
Fries, P. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.011 · Cited by 4,284
Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing
Engel, A. K., Fries, P., & Singer, W. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35094565 · Cited by 3,454
Natural Image Statistics and Neural Representation
Simoncelli, E. P., & Olshausen, B. A. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1193 · Cited by 2,460
Entrainment of Neuronal Oscillations as a Mechanism of Attentional Selection
Lakatos, P., Karmos, G., Mehta, A. D., Ulbert, I., & Schroeder, C. E. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154735 · Cited by 1,719
Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation
Fries, P. (2009) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135603 · Cited by 1,713
Dynamic Brain Sources of Visual Evoked Responses
Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Jung, T.-P., Enghoff, S., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066168 · Cited by 1,630
Giard, M. H., & Peronnet, F. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892999563544 · Cited by 1,072
Anatomical evidence of multimodal integration in primate striate cortex
Falchier, A., Clavagnier, S., Barone, P., & Kennedy, H. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-13-05749.2002 · Cited by 892 · cited 1×
“Importantly, independent anatomical evidence also reveals direct connections among early sensory areas [26,27].”
Multisensory perception: Beyond modularity and convergence
Driver, J., & Spence, C. (2000) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00740-5 · Cited by 465
Small modulation of ongoing cortical dynamics by sensory input during natural vision.
Fiser, J., Chiu, C., & Weliky, M. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02907 · Cited by 423
Integration of Bimodal Looming Signals through Neuronal Coherence in the Temporal Lobe
Maier, J. X., Chandrasekaran, C., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2008) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.05.043 · Cited by 117
Cited by
Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions
Arnal, L. H., & Giraud, A.-L. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.05.003 · Cited by 1,114
Brain-to-brain coupling: a mechanism for creating and sharing a social world
Hasson, U., Ghazanfar, A. A., Galantucci, B., Garrod, S., & Keysers, C. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.007 · Cited by 1,140
Temporal coding organized by coupled alpha and gamma oscillations prioritize visual processing
Jensen, O., Gips, B., Bergmann, T. O., & Bonnefond, M. (2014) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2014.04.001 · Cited by 389
Seth, A. K. (2014) · Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17588928.2013.877880 · Cited by 346
Meyer, L. (2018) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.13748 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, H., Liu, Z., & Poeppel, D.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-08-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e1000445
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2043952803
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 22.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
