The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolutionary Novelty in a Butterfly Wing Pattern through Enhancer Shuffling
Open accessAbstract
An important goal in evolutionary biology is to understand the genetic changes underlying novel morphological structures. We investigated the origins of a complex wing pattern found among Amazonian Heliconius butterflies. Genome sequence data from 142 individuals across 17 species identified narrow regions associated with two distinct red colour pattern elements, dennis and ray. We hypothesise that these modules in non-coding sequence represent distinct cis-regulatory loci that control expression of the transcription factor optix, which in turn controls red pattern variation across Heliconius. Phylogenetic analysis of the two elements demonstrated that they have distinct evolutionary histories and that novel adaptive morphological variation was created by shuffling these cis-regulatory modules through recombination between divergent lineages. In addition, recombination of modules into different combinations within species further contributes to diversity. Analysis of the timing of diversification in these two regions supports the hypothesis of introgression moving regulatory modules between species, rather than shared ancestral variation. The dennis phenotype introgressed into Heliconius melpomene at about the same time that ray originated in this group, while ray introgressed back into H. elevatus much more recently. We show that shuffling of existing enhancer elements both within and between species provides a mechanism for rapid diversification and generation of novel morphological combinations during adaptive radiation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations
Wray, G. A. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2063 · Cited by 1,521
Widespread parallel evolution in sticklebacks by repeated fixation of Ectodysplasin alleles.
Colosimo, P. F., Hosemann, K. E., Balabhadra, S., Villarreal, G., Dickson, M., Grimwood, J., Schmutz, J., Myers, R. M., Schluter, D., & Kingsley, D. M. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1107239 · Cited by 1,448
Cis-regulatory elements: Molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence
Wittkopp, P. J., & Kalay, G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3095 · Cited by 1,231
Adaptive Evolution of Pelvic Reduction in Sticklebacks by Recurrent Deletion of a Pitx1 Enhancer
Chan, Y. F., Marks, M. E., Jones, F. C., Villarreal, G., Shapiro, M. D., Brady, S. D., Southwick, A. M., Absher, D. M., Grimwood, J., Schmutz, J., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1182213 · Cited by 1,020
Adaptive evolution of multiple traits through multiple mutations at a single gene
Linnen, C. R., Poh, Y.-P., Peterson, B. K., Barrett, R. D. H., Larson, J. G., Jensen, J. D., & Hoekstra, H. E. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1233213 · Cited by 292
Cited by
Insights from genomes into the evolutionary importance and prevalence of hybridization in nature
Taylor, S. A., & Larson, E. L. (2019) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0777-y · Cited by 593
Recombination rate variation shapes barriers to introgression across butterfly genomes
Martin, S. H., Davey, J. W., Salazar, C., & Jiggins, C. D. (2019) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006288 · Cited by 320
Self-citationThe gene cortex controls mimicry and crypsis in butterflies and moths
Nadeau, N. J., Pardo-Diaz, C., Whibley, A., Supple, M. A., Saenko, S. V., Wallbank, R. W. R., Wu, G. C., Maroja, L., Ferguson, L., Hanly, J. J., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17961 · Cited by 264
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wallbank, R. W. R., Baxter, S. W., Pardo-Diaz, C., Hanly, J. J., Martin, S. H., Mallet, J., Dasmahapatra, K. K., Salazar, C., Joron, M., Nadeau, N., McMillan, W. O., & Jiggins, C. D.
- Venue
- PLOS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2016-01-15
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e1002353
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2238865811
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 16.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.