Cited by 57Stress Responses and CortisolAdrenal Hormones and DisordersAdvanced Control Systems Optimization

Model-based therapeutic correction of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction

Open access
Ben-Zvi, Amos, Vernon, Suzanne D., Broderick, Gordon·2009·PLoS Computational Biology

Abstract

The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is a major system maintaining body homeostasis by regulating the neuroendocrine and sympathetic nervous systems as well modulating immune function. Recent work has shown that the complex dynamics of this system accommodate several stable steady states, one of which corresponds to the hypocortisol state observed in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). At present these dynamics are not formally considered in the development of treatment strategies. Here we use model-based predictive control (MPC) methodology to estimate robust treatment courses for displacing the HPA axis from an abnormal hypocortisol steady state back to a healthy cortisol level. This approach was applied to a recent model of HPA axis dynamics incorporating glucocorticoid receptor kinetics. A candidate treatment that displays robust properties in the face of significant biological variability and measurement uncertainty requires that cortisol be further suppressed for a short period until adrenocorticotropic hormone levels exceed 30% of baseline. Treatment may then be discontinued, and the HPA axis will naturally progress to a stable attractor defined by normal hormone levels. Suppression of biologically available cortisol may be achieved through the use of binding proteins such as CBG and certain metabolizing enzymes, thus offering possible avenues for deployment in a clinical setting. Treatment strategies can therefore be designed that maximally exploit system dynamics to provide a robust response to treatment and ensure a positive outcome over a wide range of conditions. Perhaps most importantly, a treatment course involving further reduction in cortisol, even transient, is quite counterintuitive and challenges the conventional strategy of supplementing cortisol levels, an approach based on steady-state reasoning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000273

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Regulatory interactions between entities were drawn from the Pathway Studio knowledge database, a repository extracted from the published scientific literature using the MedScan natural language processing engine.

    “Regulatory interactions (edges) between these entities were drawn from the Pathway Studio (Elsevier, Amsterdam NL) knowledge database, a repository extracted from the published scientific literature using the MedScan34 natural language processing engine.”

    From Leveraging Prior Knowledge of Endocrine Immune Regulation in the Therapeutically-relevant Phenotyping of Women with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Introduction and Methods describe an HPA-axis model and model-based treatment, not a Pathway Studio knowledge database. Searches for Pathway Studio, MedScan, and literature-extracted regulatory interactions found no passage in our copy addressing the claim. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ben-Zvi, A., Vernon, S. D., & Broderick, G.
Affiliations
  • Solve ME/CFS Initiative (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Broderick, Gordon
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2009-01-23
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
e1000273
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W2038872111
Cited by
56
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • University of Alberta
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Keywords
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, chronic fatigue syndrome, model predictive control, cortisol suppression, ACTH, corticosteroid-binding globulin, robust control, biological variation
MeSH terms
Adrenal Insufficiency, Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Models, Biological, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Receptors, Glucocorticoid, Transcortin, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Feedback, Physiological, Systems Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review