Cited by 44Hepatitis B Virus StudiesVirus-based gene therapy researchCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

Predictors of hepatitis B cure using gene therapy to deliver DNA cleavage enzymes: a mathematical modeling approach

Open access
Schiffer, Joshua T., Swan, Dave A., Stone, Daniel, Jerome, Keith R.·2013·PLoS Computational Biology

Abstract

Most chronic viral infections are managed with small molecule therapies that inhibit replication but are not curative because non-replicating viral forms can persist despite decades of suppressive treatment. There are therefore numerous strategies in development to eradicate all non-replicating viruses from the body. We are currently engineering DNA cleavage enzymes that specifically target hepatitis B virus covalently closed circular DNA (HBV cccDNA), the episomal form of the virus that persists despite potent antiviral therapies. DNA cleavage enzymes, including homing endonucleases or meganucleases, zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), TAL effector nucleases (TALENs), and CRISPR-associated system 9 (Cas9) proteins, can disrupt specific regions of viral DNA. Because DNA repair is error prone, the virus can be neutralized after repeated cleavage events when a target sequence becomes mutated. DNA cleavage enzymes will be delivered as genes within viral vectors that enter hepatocytes. Here we develop mathematical models that describe the delivery and intracellular activity of DNA cleavage enzymes. Model simulations predict that high vector to target cell ratio, limited removal of delivery vectors by humoral immunity, and avid binding between enzyme and its DNA target will promote the highest level of cccDNA disruption. Development of de novo resistance to cleavage enzymes may occur if DNA cleavage and error prone repair does not render the viral episome replication incompetent: our model predicts that concurrent delivery of multiple enzymes which target different vital cccDNA regions, or sequential delivery of different enzymes, are both potentially useful strategies for avoiding multi-enzyme resistance. The underlying dynamics of cccDNA persistence are unlikely to impact the probability of cure provided that antiviral therapy is given concurrently during eradication trials. We conclude by describing experiments that can be used to validate the model, which will in turn provide vital information for dose selection for potential curative trials in animals and ultimately humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003131

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Theoretically, combined with effective suppression of HBV replication by NAs, specific disruption of the HBV genome may result in eradication of HBV cccDNA, hence curing chronic HBV infection.

    “Theoretically, combined with effective suppression of HBV replication by NAs, specific disruption of the HBV genome may result in eradication of HBV cccDNA, hence curing chronic HBV infection.7”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schiffer, J. T., Swan, D. A., Stone, D., & Jerome, K. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Schiffer, Joshua T.
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2013-07-04
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
e1003131
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W2002897411
Cited by
44
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1018811)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI096111, K23AI087206)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Hepatitis B Virus Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
hepatitis B virus, covalently closed circular DNA, gene therapy, CRISPR/Cas9, zinc finger nucleases, TALEN, homing endonucleases, mathematical modeling, viral persistence, humoral immunity, de novo resistance, antiviral therapy, dose selection, hepatocytes
MeSH terms
DNA, DNA Repair, Genetic Vectors, Hepatitis B, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Genetic Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review