Cited by 151Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesComplex Network Analysis Techniques

Quantifying Differences and Similarities in Whole-Brain White Matter Architecture Using Local Connectome Fingerprints

Open access
Yeh, Fang-Cheng, Vettel, Jean M., Singh, Aarti, Poczos, Barnabas, Grafton, Scott T., Erickson, Kirk I., Tseng, Wen-Yih I., Verstynen, Timothy D.·2016·PLOS Computational Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Quantifying differences or similarities in connectomes has been a challenge due to the immense complexity of global brain networks. Here we introduce a noninvasive method that uses diffusion MRI to characterize whole-brain white matter architecture as a single local connectome fingerprint that allows for a direct comparison between structural connectomes. In four independently acquired data sets with repeated scans (total N=213), we show that the local connectome fingerprint is highly specific to an individual, allowing for an accurate self-versus-others classification that achieved 100% accuracy across 17,398 identification tests. The estimated classification error was approximately one thousand times smaller than fingerprints derived from diffusivity-based measures or region-to-region connectivity patterns. The local connectome fingerprint also revealed neuroplasticity within an individual reflected as a decreasing trend in self-similarity across time, whereas this change was not observed in the diffusivity measures. Moreover, the local connectome fingerprint can be used as a phenotypic marker, revealing 12.51% similarity between monozygotic twins, 5.14% between dizygotic twins, and 4.51% between none-twin siblings. This novel approach opens a new door for probing the influence of pathological, genetic, social, or environmental factors on the unique configuration of the human connectome. Author Summary The local organization of white matter architecture is highly unique to individuals, making it a tangible metric of connectomic differences. The variability in local white matter architecture is found to be partially determined by genetic factors, but largely plastic across time. This approach opens a new door for probing the influence of pathological, genetic, social, or environmental factors on the unique configuration of the human connectome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005203

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Centralising or releasing data poses regulatory, ethical and legal challenges related to privacy and data protection, as well as technical ones; anonymising, controlling access and safely transferring healthcare data is non-trivial, and patient reidentification or information leakage cannot be ruled out unless anonymisation destroys data fidelity.

    “Centralising or releasing data, however, poses not only regulatory, ethical and legal challenges, related to privacy and data protection, but also technical ones.”

    From The future of digital health with federated learning (2020) · cites this paper as [38]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeh, F.-C., Vettel, J. M., Singh, A., Poczos, B., Grafton, S. T., Erickson, K. I., Tseng, W.-Y. I., & Verstynen, T. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition (US)
Corresponding author
  • Yeh, Fang-Cheng
  • Verstynen, Timothy D.
Venue
PLOS Computational Biology
Published
2016-11-15
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
e1005203
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W2952835181
Cited by
151
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 8
FWCI
11.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Army Research Laboratory (W911NF-10-2-0022)
  • National Science Foundation (1247658)
  • Ministry of Economic Affairs (101-EC-17-A-19-S1-175)
  • National Institutes of Health (US) (DK095172)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
white matter architecture, structural connectome, neuroplasticity, monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins, phenotypic markers, diffusion MRI
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Brain, Female, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Male, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Sensitivity and Specificity, Subtraction Technique, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Connectome, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review