Cited by 51Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence Applications

German medical students´ views regarding artificial intelligence in medicine: A cross-sectional survey

Open access
McLennan, Stuart, Meyer, Andrea, Schreyer, Korbinian, Buyx, Alena·2022·PLOS Digital Health

Abstract

Background: Medical students will likely be most impacted by the envisaged move to artificial intelligence (AI) driven digital medicine, and there is a need to better understand their views regarding the use of AI technology in medicine. This study aimed to explore German medical students´ views about AI in medicine. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in October 2019 with all new medical students at the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich and the Technical University Munich. This represented approximately 10% of all new medical students in Germany. Results: A total of 844 medical students participated (91.9% response rate). Two thirds (64.4%) did not feel well informed about AI in medicine. Just over a half (57.4%) of students thought that AI has useful applications in medicine, particularly in drug research and development (82.5%), less so for clinical uses. Male students were more likely to agree with advantages of AI, and female participants were more likely to be concerned about disadvantages. The vast majority of students thought that when AI is used in medicine that it is important that there are legal rules regarding liability (97%) and oversight mechanisms (93.7%), that physicians should be consulted prior to implementation (96.8%), that developers should be able to explain to them the details of the algorithm (95.6%), that algorithms should use representative data (93.9%), and that patients should always be informed when AI is used (93.5%). Conclusions: Medical schools and continuing medical education organisers need to promptly develop programs to ensure that clinicians are able to fully realize the potential of AI technology. It is also important that legal rules and oversight are implemented to ensure that future clinicians are not faced with a workplace where important issues around responsibility are not clearly regulated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000114

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A lack of workplace responsibility is a concern, with some experts calling for legislation and oversight processes to prevent this.

    “Alternatively, a lack of workplace responsibility is another concern, with some experts calling for legislation and oversight processes to prevent this [167].”
  • Universities from the United States, Canada, France, Germany, and Taiwan have integrated AI into their UGME curricula through various courses and strategies.

    “Universities from the United States, Canada, France, Germany, and Taiwan have integrated AI into their UGME curricula through various courses and strategies, providing valuable feedback for other medical schools to observe how their implementation efforts were carried out [167].”

    From Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [167]

    The Discussion says AI training programs or modules in medical schools are currently limited and recommends developing them; it does not identify universities in the five named countries that have integrated AI into undergraduate medical education. The Survey implementation section describes a compulsory course at two Munich universities but explicitly says it has no specific focus on AI. Searches for the named countries and for AI curricula or courses found no account of the claimed implementations or feedback from them; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]Johannes MS, et al. An overview of the developmental process for the modular prosthetic limb. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest 2011; 30: 207– 216.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McLennan, S., Meyer, A., Schreyer, K., & Buyx, A.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • University of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
McLennan, Stuart
Venue
PLOS Digital Health
Published
2022-10-04
Volume
1
Issue
10
Pages
e0000114
ISSN
2767-3170 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4301390460
Cited by
50
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 4
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLOS Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, medical students, attitudes toward AI, digital medicine, liability, algorithmic transparency, informed consent, gender differences, medical education, pharmaceutical R&D

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review