Cited by 138Genetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesGenetic factors in colorectal cancerGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

CTCF cis-regulates trinucleotide repeat instability in an epigenetic manner: a novel basis for mutational hot spot determination

Open access
Libby, Randell T., Hagerman, Katharine A., Pineda, Victor V., Lau, Rachel, Cho, Diane H., Baccam, Sandy L., Axford, Michelle M., Cleary, John D. +6 more·2008·PLoS Genetics

Abstract

At least 25 inherited disorders in humans result from microsatellite repeat expansion. Dramatic variation in repeat instability occurs at different disease loci and between different tissues; however, cis-elements and trans-factors regulating the instability process remain undefined. Genomic fragments from the human spinocerebellar ataxia type 7 (SCA7) locus, containing a highly unstable CAG tract, were previously introduced into mice to localize cis-acting "instability elements," and revealed that genomic context is required for repeat instability. The critical instability-inducing region contained binding sites for CTCF -- a regulatory factor implicated in genomic imprinting, chromatin remodeling, and DNA conformation change. To evaluate the role of CTCF in repeat instability, we derived transgenic mice carrying SCA7 genomic fragments with CTCF binding-site mutations. We found that CTCF binding-site mutation promotes triplet repeat instability both in the germ line and in somatic tissues, and that CpG methylation of CTCF binding sites can further destabilize triplet repeat expansions. As CTCF binding sites are associated with a number of highly unstable repeat loci, our findings suggest a novel basis for demarcation and regulation of mutational hot spots and implicate CTCF in the modulation of genetic repeat instability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000257

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disruption of a CTCF binding site at the Atxn7 locus leads to increased somatic and germline repeat instability in a transgenic mouse model of spinocerebellar ataxia 7.

    “Disruption of a CTCF binding site at the Atxn7 locus leads to increased somatic and germline repeat instability in a transgenic mouse model of spinocerebellar ataxia 7 (Libby et al., 2008).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Libby, R. T., Hagerman, K. A., Pineda, V. V., Lau, R., Cho, D. H., Baccam, S. L., Axford, M. M., Cleary, J. D., Moore, J. M., Sopher, B. L., Tapscott, S. J., Filippova, G. N., Pearson, C. E., & La Spada, A. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington Medical Center (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2008-11-14
Volume
4
Issue
11
Pages
e1000257
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W2053187937
Cited by
138
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Muscular Dystrophy Association
  • University of Toronto
  • Hospital for Sick Children
  • National Institutes of Health (AG-00057)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 00057, T32AG000057)
  • National Eye Institute (EY14061, R01EY014061)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA068360, CA68360)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM59356, R01GM059356)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR050741, AR4203)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
CTCF, trinucleotide repeat instability, spinocerebellar ataxia type 7, CAG repeat, cis-regulation, CpG methylation, mutational hotspots, transgenic mice, epigenetic regulation, somatic instability
MeSH terms
Ataxin-7, CCCTC-Binding Factor, Animals, Binding Sites, DNA-Binding Proteins, Female, Humans, Male, Mice, Inbred C3H, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Mutation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Repressor Proteins, DNA Methylation, Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion, Spinocerebellar Ataxias, Genomic Instability, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review