Cited by 442Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structureRace, Genetics, and Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Admixture in Latin America: Geographic Structure, Phenotypic Diversity and Self-Perception of Ancestry Based on 7,342 Individuals

Open access
Ruiz-Linares, Andrés, Adhikari, Kaustubh, Acuña-Alonzo, Victor, Quinto-Sanchez, Mirsha, Jaramillo, Claudia, Arias, William, Fuentes, Macarena, Pizarro, María, Everardo, Paola, de Avila, Francisco, Gómez-Valdés, Jorge, León-Mimila, Paola, Hunemeier, Tábita, Ramallo, Virginia, Silva de Cerqueira, Caio C., Burley, Mari-Wyn, Konca, Esra, de Oliveira, Marcelo Zagonel, Veronez, Mauricio Roberto, Rubio-Codina, Marta, Attanasio, Orazio, Gibbon, Sahra, Ray, Nicolas, Gallo, Carla, Poletti, Giovanni, Rosique, Javier, Schuler-Faccini, Lavinia, Salzano, Francisco M., Bortolini, Maria-Cátira, Canizales-Quinteros, Samuel, Rothhammer, Francisco, Bedoya, Gabriel, Balding, David, Gonzalez-José, Rolando·2014·PLoS Genetics

Abstract

The current genetic makeup of Latin America has been shaped by a history of extensive admixture between Africans, Europeans and Native Americans, a process taking place within the context of extensive geographic and social stratification. We estimated individual ancestry proportions in a sample of 7,342 subjects ascertained in five countries (Brazil, Chile, Colombia, México and Perú). These individuals were also characterized for a range of physical appearance traits and for self-perception of ancestry. The geographic distribution of admixture proportions in this sample reveals extensive population structure, illustrating the continuing impact of demographic history on the genetic diversity of Latin America. Significant ancestry effects were detected for most phenotypes studied. However, ancestry generally explains only a modest proportion of total phenotypic variation. Genetically estimated and self-perceived ancestry correlate significantly, but certain physical attributes have a strong impact on self-perception and bias self-perception of ancestry relative to genetically estimated ancestry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004572

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Geographic distribution of Native American (blue), African (green) and European (red) ancestry based on individual estimates for samples from (A) Brazil, (B) Chile, (C) Colombia, (D) México and (E) Perú. To facilitate comparison, color intensity transitions occur at 10% ancestry intervals for all maps. The birthplace of individuals are indicated by purple dots on the African ancestry map. Sampling density is shown in Figure S4. Maps were obtained using Kriging interpolation as detailed in the text.
Figure 1 Geographic distribution of Native American (blue), African (green) and European (red) ancestry based on individual estimates for samples from (A) Brazil, (B) Chile, (C) Colombia, (D) México and (E) Perú. To facilitate comparison, color intensity transitions occur at 10% ancestry intervals for all maps. The birthplace of individuals are indicated by purple dots on the African ancestry map. Sampling density is shown in Figure S4. Maps were obtained using Kriging interpolation as detailed in the text.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Bar plots contrasting skin pigmentation (Melanin Index) to proportion of European genetic ancestry across four self-identified ethno/racial categories in samples from Brazil, Chile, Colombia, México and Perú. Sample sizes and all estimates of pigmentation and ancestry, are presented in Table S4. In Perú no individual self-identified as “Black”.
Figure 2 Bar plots contrasting skin pigmentation (Melanin Index) to proportion of European genetic ancestry across four self-identified ethno/racial categories in samples from Brazil, Chile, Colombia, México and Perú. Sample sizes and all estimates of pigmentation and ancestry, are presented in Table S4. In Perú no individual self-identified as “Black”.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Vertical histograms (pyramid plots) showing the distribution of genetic ancestry for each of the five self-perceived ancestry categories. As reference, (A) shows the theoretical case of agreement between self-perceived and genetically estimated ancestry. For this plot random values were drawn from a beta distribution such that, for each self-perception band, the median ancestry lies at the centre of a 0.2 interval containing 75% of the simulated ancestry values. The number of simulated values was fixed at our sample size. Panels (B), (C) and (D) show respectively, the observed distributions for European, Native American and African ancestries. The red diagonal line indicates the midpoint, on the genetic ancestry scale, of each self-perceived ancestry category. Distributions are coded in three shades of orange: the darkest shade denotes the central quartiles (the median shown as a brown line), the medium-shade indicates the 5%–95% range, and the lightest shade refers to samples outside this range. For European ancestry, self-perception tends to underestimate genetic ancestry (the distributions are mostly above the diagonal). By contrast, self-perception tends to overestimate African ancestry (the distributions are mostly below the diagonal). At increasing levels of Native American genetic ancestry self-perception first underestimates then overestimates genetic ancestry (the distributions are on both sides of the diagonal). Simulations and plots were carried out using MATLAB [61].
Figure 3 Vertical histograms (pyramid plots) showing the distribution of genetic ancestry for each of the five self-perceived ancestry categories. As reference, (A) shows the theoretical case of agreement between self-perceived and genetically estimated ancestry. For this plot random values were drawn from a beta distribution such that, for each self-perception band, the median ancestry lies at the centre of a 0.2 interval containing 75% of the simulated ancestry values. The number of simulated values was fixed at our sample size. Panels (B), (C) and (D) show respectively, the observed distributions for European, Native American and African ancestries. The red diagonal line indicates the midpoint, on the genetic ancestry scale, of each self-perceived ancestry category. Distributions are coded in three shades of orange: the darkest shade denotes the central quartiles (the median shown as a brown line), the medium-shade indicates the 5%–95% range, and the lightest shade refers to samples outside this range. For European ancestry, self-perception tends to underestimate genetic ancestry (the distributions are mostly above the diagonal). By contrast, self-perception tends to overestimate African ancestry (the distributions are mostly below the diagonal). At increasing levels of Native American genetic ancestry self-perception first underestimates then overestimates genetic ancestry (the distributions are on both sides of the diagonal). Simulations and plots were carried out using MATLAB [61].CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 442

Metadata

Authors
Ruiz-Linares, A., Adhikari, K., Acuña-Alonzo, V., Quinto-Sanchez, M., Jaramillo, C., Arias, W., Fuentes, M., Pizarro, M., Everardo, P., de Avila, F., Gómez-Valdés, J., León-Mimila, P., Hunemeier, T., Ramallo, V., Silva de Cerqueira, C. C., Burley, M.-W., Konca, E., de Oliveira, M. Z., Veronez, M. R., Rubio-Codina, M., Attanasio, O., Gibbon, S., Ray, N., Gallo, C., Poletti, G., Rosique, J., Schuler-Faccini, L., Salzano, F. M., Bortolini, M.-C., Canizales-Quinteros, S., Rothhammer, F., Bedoya, G., Balding, D., & Gonzalez-José, R.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Universidad de Antioquia (CO)
  • University of Tarapacá (CL)
  • National Institute of Anthropology and History (MX)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • Institute for Fiscal Studies (GB)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (PE)
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2014-09-25
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
e1004572
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W2112602049
Cited by
442
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 2
FWCI
24.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Institutional Repository University of Antioquia (University of Antioquia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Universidad de Chile (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Leverhulme Trust (F/07 134/DF)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/I021213/1)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/H021221/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
admixture, genetic ancestry estimation, population structure, phenotypic diversity, demographic history, genetic diversity, self-perception bias
MeSH terms
Ethnicity, Biological Evolution, Female, Genetics, Population, Geography, Humans, Latin America, Male, Phenotype, Self Concept, Genetic Variation, Quantitative Trait, Heritable

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review