The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Sharing research data provides benefit to the general scientific community, but the benefit is less obvious for the investigator who makes his or her data available. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We examined the citation history of 85 cancer microarray clinical trial publications with respect to the availability of their data. The 48% of trials with publicly available microarray data received 85% of the aggregate citations. Publicly available data was significantly (p = 0.006) associated with a 69% increase in citations, independently of journal impact factor, date of publication, and author country of origin using linear regression. SIGNIFICANCE: This correlation between publicly available data and increased literature impact may further motivate investigators to share their detailed research data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Journal articles with accompanying data may be cited more frequently [248,249].”
From Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (2020) · cites this paper as [248]
In the citing paper
“Data sharing is also associated with an increased number of citations.87 88”
From SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025) · cites this paper as [87]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository
Edgar, R. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.207 · Cited by 13,288
Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data
Brazma, A., Hingamp, P., Quackenbush, J., Sherlock, G., Spellman, P., Stoeckert, C., Aach, J., Ansorge, W., Ball, C. A., Causton, H. C., et al. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1201-365 · Cited by 4,109
ONCOMINE: A Cancer Microarray Database and Integrated Data-Mining Platform
Rhodes, D. R., Yu, J., Sundaram, S. K., Deshpande, N., Varambally, R., Ghosh, D., Barrette, T. R., Pander, A., & Chinnaiyan, A. M. (2004) · Neoplasia · doi:10.1016/s1476-5586(04)80047-2 · Cited by 3,719
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
Seglen, P. O. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497 · Cited by 2,447
Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK)
McShane, L. M., Altman, D. G., Sauerbrei, W., Taube, S. E., Gion, M., & Clark, G. M. (2005) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/dji237 · Cited by 2,162
ArrayExpress--a public repository for microarray gene expression data at the EBI
Parkinson, H. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki056 · Cited by 1,077
Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles
Eysenbach, G. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157 · Cited by 829
Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact?
Antelman, K. (2004) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.65.5.372 · Cited by 678
The Stanford Microarray Database
Sherlock, G. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.1.152 · Cited by 528
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 878
Disciplinary reach: Investigating the impact of dataset reuse in the earth sciences
Chao, T. C. (2011) · Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/meet.2011.14504801125 · Cited by 21
Crosas, M. (2012) · Journal of eScience Librarianship · doi:10.7191/jeslib.2012.1020 · Cited by 21
Archiving South African digital research data: How ready are we?
Koopman, M. M., & de Jager, K. (2016) · South African Journal of Science · doi:10.17159/sajs.2016/20150316 · Cited by 21
Why Do Some Articles in Planning Journals Get Cited More than Others?
Stevens, M. R., Park, K., Tian, G., Kim, K., & Ewing, R. (2019) · Journal of Planning Education and Research · doi:10.1177/0739456x19827083 · Cited by 21
Technology, Data and New Models for Sustainably Managing Ocean Resources
Leape, J., Abbott, M., Sakaguchi, H., Brett, A., Cao, L., Chand, K., Golbuu, Y., Martin, T., Mayorga, J., & Myksvoll, M. S. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16277-0_6 · Cited by 25
Facilitating open exchange of data and information
Gallagher, J. J., Orcutt, J. A., Simpson, P., Wright, D. J., Pearlman, J. S., & Raymond, L. (2015) · Earth Science Informatics · doi:10.1007/s12145-014-0202-2 · Cited by 21
The History, Advocacy and Efficacy of Data Management PlansPreprint
Smale, N., Unsworth, K., Denyer, G. S., & Barr, D. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/443499 · Cited by 21
Citação de dados científicos: scoping review
da Silveira, L., Barbosa, A. D., Ferreira, M. K., & Caregnato, S. E. (2020) · Encontros Bibli Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação · doi:10.5007/1518-2924.2020.e72153 · Cited by 20
Open science in agricultural economics
Finger, R., Henningsen, A., Höhler, J., Huber, R., Rommel, J., & Grebitus, C. (2024) · Q Open · doi:10.1093/qopen/qoae029 · Cited by 25
A One Health evaluation framework
Rüegg, S. R., Häsler, B., Nielsen, L. R., Buttiġieġ, S. C., Santa, M., Aragrande, M., Canali, M., Ehlinger, T. J., Queenan, K., Chantziaras, I., et al. (2018) · Wageningen Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.3920/9789086868759_005 · Cited by 22
Weinshall, K., & Epstein, L. (2020) · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/jels.12250 · Cited by 20
Reichmann, S., Klebel, T., Hasani‐Mavriqi, I., & Ross‐Hellauer, T. (2021) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24492 · Cited by 28
Ten simple rules for maximizing the recommendations of the NIH data management and sharing plan
Gonzales, S., Carson, M. B., & Holmes, K. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010397 · Cited by 20
Assigning credit to scientific datasets using article citation networks
Zeng, T., Wu, L., Bratt, S., & Acuna, D. E. (2020) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2020.101013 · Cited by 21
On the Convergence of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Data Science
Goldstein, N. D., LeVasseur, M. T., & McClure, L. A. (2020) · Harvard Data Science Review · doi:10.1162/99608f92.9f0215e6 · Cited by 20
Herold, P. (2015) · Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication · doi:10.7710/2162-3309.1244 · Cited by 20
Open Practices in Visualization Research : Opinion Paper
Haroz, S. (2018) · IEEE Evaluation and Beyond - Methodological Approaches for Visualization (BELIV) · doi:10.1109/beliv.2018.8634427 · Cited by 20
SciRide Finder: a citation-based paradigm in biomedical literature search
Volanakis, A., & Krawczyk, K. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-24571-0 · Cited by 19
Can we share models if sharing data is not an option?
Li, Z., Mao, F., & Wu, C. (2022) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2022.100603 · Cited by 20
Klöcking, M., Wyborn, L., Lehnert, K. A., Ware, B., Prent, A., Profeta, L. R., Kohlmann, F., Noble, W. P., Bruno, I. J., Lambart, S., et al. (2022) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2023.04.024 · Cited by 23
GeneProf data: a resource of curated, integrated and reusable high-throughput genomics experiments
Halbritter, F., Kousa, A. I., & Tomlinson, S. R. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt966 · Cited by 19
Vogt, L. (2013) · Systematics and Biodiversity · doi:10.1080/14772000.2013.818588 · Cited by 19
In-depth examination of spatiotemporal figures in open reproducible research
Konkol, M., & Kray, C. (2018) · Cartography and Geographic Information Science · doi:10.1080/15230406.2018.1512421 · Cited by 19
DataCite as a novel bibliometric source: Coverage, strengths and limitations
Robinson‐García, N., Mongeon, P., Jeng, W., & Costas, R. (2017) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 19
Towards a paradigm for open and free sharing of scientific data on global change science in china
Peng, C. H., Song, X., Jiang, H. T., Zhu, Q., Chen, H., Chen, J. M., Gong, P., Chang, J., Xiang, W., Yu, G., et al. (2016) · Ecosystem Health and Sustainability · doi:10.1002/ehs2.1225 · Cited by 19
Why sharing data and code during peer review can enhance behavioral ecology research
Fernández‐Juricic, E. (2021) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-021-03036-x · Cited by 18
Ziegler, C. R., Webb, J. A., Norton, S. B., Pullin, A. S., & Melcher, A. H. (2015) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.003 · Cited by 18
Piwowar, H. (2010) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 18
Self-citationOpening GIScience: A process-based approach
Shannon, J., & Walker, K. E. (2018) · International Journal of Geographical Information Systems · doi:10.1080/13658816.2018.1464167 · Cited by 17
5.6 Publikation und Zitierung von digitalen Forschungsdaten
Pampel, H., & Elger, K. (2021) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110657807-028 · Cited by 16
Boll, A., Vieregg, N., & Kehrer, T. (2022) · Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11334-022-00442-w · Cited by 17
NSDF: Neuroscience Simulation Data Format
Ray, S., Chintaluri, C., Bhalla, U. S., & Wojcik, D. K. (2015) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-015-9282-5 · Cited by 17
Zhang, L., & Ma, L. (2023) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04684-8 · Cited by 19
Miller, J. D. (2010) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-11-112 · Cited by 17
Pisani, E., & Botchway, S. (2017) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.12259.1 · Cited by 17
Perceptions and Attitudes toward Data Sharing among Dental Researchers
Spallek, H., Weinberg, S. M., Manz, M. C., Nanayakkara, S., Zhou, X., & Johnson, L. A. (2018) · JDR Clinical & Translational Research · doi:10.1177/2380084418790451 · Cited by 17
An open future for ecological and evolutionary data?
Kenall, A., Harold, S., & Foote, C. G. (2014) · BMC Ecology · doi:10.1186/1472-6785-14-10 · Cited by 17
Spires‐Jones, T. L., Poirazi, P., & Grubb, M. S. (2016) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.13234 · Cited by 17
Guidelines for mechanistic modeling and analysis in cardiovascular research
Colebank, M. J., Oomen, P. J. A., Witzenburg, C. M., Grosberg, A., Beard, D. A., Husmeier, D., Olufsen, M. S., & Chesler, N. C. (2024) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00766.2023 · Cited by 18
Adventures in data citation: sorghum genome data exemplifies the new gold standard
Edmunds, S., Pollard, T., Hole, B., & Basford, A. T. (2012) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/1756-0500-5-223 · Cited by 16
Web Syndication Approaches for Sharing Primary Data in "Small Science" Domains
Kansa, E. C., & Bissell, A. N. (2010) · Data Science Journal · doi:10.2481/dsj.009-012 · Cited by 16
Seven Reasons Why: A User’s Guide to Transparency and Reproducibility
Filho, D. B. F., Lins, R. G. P., Domingos, A. R. M., Janz, N., & Silva, L. (2019) · Brazilian Political Science Review · doi:10.1590/1981-3821201900020001 · Cited by 19
Schmidt‐Kloiber, A., Moe, S. J., Dudley, B. J., Strackbein, J., & Vogl, R. (2012) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1295-6 · Cited by 16
Systems approaches to human autoimmune diseases
Banchereau, R., Cepika, A., & Pascual, V. (2013) · Current Opinion in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.coi.2013.08.005 · Cited by 17
Metadata Activities in Biology
Gil, I. S., Hutchison, V. B., Frame, M., & Palanisamy, G. (2010) · Journal of Library Metadata · doi:10.1080/19386389.2010.506389 · Cited by 16
Szkuta, K., & Osimo, D. (2016) · foresight · doi:10.1108/fs-06-2014-0040 · Cited by 15
Making radiotherapy more efficient with FAIR data
Kalendralis, P., Sloep, M., van Soest, J., Dekker, A. L. A. J., & Fijten, R. (2021) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.01.083 · Cited by 16
What Drives Academic Data Sharing?Preprint
Fecher, B., Friesike, S., & Hebing, M. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2439645 · Cited by 16
Wouters, P. F., Thelwall, M. A., Kousha, K., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Franssen, T. (2015) · Cited by 16
Challenges in building scholarly knowledge graphs for research assessment in open science
Manghi, P. (2024) · Quantitative Science Studies · doi:10.1162/qss_a_00322 · Cited by 20
Keeping the promise: a critique of the current state of microdosing research
Petranker, R., Anderson, T., Fewster, E. C., Aberman, Y., Hazan, M., Gaffrey, M. S., & Seli, P. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1217102 · Cited by 19
A review of the granite concept through time
González‐Esvertit, E., Prieto-Torrell, C., Bons, P. D., Canals, À., Casas, J. M., Elburg, M., & Gómez-Rivas, E. (2024) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.105008 · Cited by 15
Scientific Journals can Advance Tropical Biology and Conservation by Requiring Data Archiving
Bruna, E. M. (2010) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00652.x · Cited by 15
Institutional Digital Repositories for Science and Technology: A View from the Laboratory
Brown, C. M., & Abbas, J. M. (2010) · Journal of Library Administration · doi:10.1080/01930821003634930 · Cited by 15
Predictors of Citation Rate in Psychology: Inconclusive Influence of Effect and Sample Size
Hanel, P. H. P., & Haase, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01160 · Cited by 16
Crewe, T. L., Kendal, D., & Campbell, H. A. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0241964 · Cited by 15
Mallasvik, M. L., & Martins, J. T. (2020) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-08-2020-0135 · Cited by 14
Are your spectroscopic data being used?
Gordon, I. E., Potterbusch, M., Bouquin, D. R., Erdmann, C. C., Wilzewski, J., & Rothman, L. S. (2016) · Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.jms.2016.03.011 · Cited by 15
Fator de impacto: importância e influência no meio editorial, acadêmico e científico
Ruiz, M. A., Greco, O. T., & Braile, D. M. (2009) · Revista Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia · doi:10.1590/s1516-84842009005000080 · Cited by 15
Warden, R. (2016) · ecancermedicalscience · doi:10.3332/ecancer.2010.203 · Cited by 15
Reporting In Vitro Experiments Responsibly – the RIVER RecommendationsPreprint
The RIVER working group (2023) · MetArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/x6aut · Cited by 18
FAIR data sharing: An international perspective on why medical researchers are lagging behind
Rainey, L., Lutomski, J. E., & Broeders, M. J. M. (2023) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517231171052 · Cited by 14
The Limits of sharing: Controlled data collections
Eschenfelder, K. R., & Johnson, A. M. (2011) · Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/meet.2011.14504801062 · Cited by 14
Open science: a revolution in sight?
Rentier, B. (2016) · Interlending & Document Supply · doi:10.1108/ilds-06-2016-0020 · Cited by 14
Sharing is caring: Ethical implications of transparent research in psychology.
Bosma, C. M., & Granger, A. M. (2022) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0001002 · Cited by 19
The need and drive for open data in biomedical publishing
Hrynaszkiewicz, I. (2011) · Serials The Journal for the Serials Community · doi:10.1629/2431 · Cited by 14
Hamilton, I., Oreszczyn, T., Summerfield, A. J., Steadman, P., Elam, S., & Smith, A. (2015) · Procedia Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.537 · Cited by 14
Markdoc: Literate Programming in Stata
Haghish, E. F. (2016) · The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x1601600409 · Cited by 14
Harwell, L. C., Vivian, D. N., McLaughlin, M. D., & Hafner, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2019.00072 · Cited by 14
Health solutions: theoretical foundations of the shift from sectoral to integrated systems
Kock, R. A., Queenan, K., Garnier, J., Nielsen, R. L., Buttiġieġ, S. C., Meneghi, D. D., Holmberg, M., Zinsstag, J., Rüegg, S. R., & Häsler, B. (2018) · Wageningen Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.3920/9789086868759_004 · Cited by 14
Report On Best Practices For Citability Of Data And On Evolving Roles In Scholarly Communication
Rachael Kotarski, A., Reilly, S., Schrimpf, S., Eefke Smit, D., & Walshe, K. (2012) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8310 · Cited by 14
Current reproducibility practices in management: What they are versus what they could be
Cortina, J. M., Köhler, T., & Aulisi, L. C. (2023) · Journal of Management Scientific Reports · doi:10.1177/27550311231202696 · Cited by 15
The use of rewards in the sharing of research resources
Shibayama, S., & Lawson, C. (2021) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104260 · Cited by 13
Tincani, M., Gilroy, S. P., & Dowdy, A. (2024) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.2909 · Cited by 15
Code sharing in ecology and evolution increases citation rates but remains uncommon
Maitner, B., Andrade, P. E. S., Lei, L., Kass, J. M., Owens, H. L., Barbosa, G. C. G., Boyle, B. L., Castorena, M., Enquist, B. J., Feng, X., et al. (2024) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.70030 · Cited by 17
Linkitup: Semantic Publishing of Research Data
Hoekstra, R., Groth, P., & Charlaganov, M. (2014) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12024-9_12 · Cited by 13
Towards Quantifying Uncertainty in Data Analysis & Exploration.
Chung, Y., Servan-Schreiber, S., Zgraggen, E., & Kraska, T. (2018) · IEEE Data(base) Engineering Bulletin · Cited by 13
Delikoura, E., & Kouis, D. (2021) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications9020014 · Cited by 16
Kapfhammer, G. M. (2011) · IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW) · doi:10.1109/icstw.2011.88 · Cited by 13
Datos abiertos de investigación. Camino recorrido y cuestiones pendientes
Peset, F., Aleixandre‐Benavent, R., Gil, Y. B., & Ferrer-Sapena, A. (2017) · Anales de Documentación · doi:10.6018/analesdoc.20.1.272101 · Cited by 22
An assessment of transparency and reproducibility‐related research practices in otolaryngology
Johnson, A., Torgerson, T., Skinner, M., Hamilton, T., Tritz, D., & Vassar, M. B. (2019) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.28322 · Cited by 14
How can evolutionary and biological anthropologists engage broader audiences?
Jones, J. H., Pisor, A. C., Douglass, K., Bird, R. B., Ready, E., Hazel, A., Hackman, J., Kramer, K. L., Kohler, T. A., Pontzer, H., et al. (2021) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/ajhb.23592 · Cited by 14
Data Management in Astrobiology: Challenges and Opportunities for an Interdisciplinary Community
Aydınoğlu, A. U., Suomela, T., & Malone, J. (2014) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2013.1127 · Cited by 14
It’s all in the timing: calibrating temporal penalties for biomedical data sharing
Xia, W., Wan, Z., Yin, Z., Gaupp, J., Liu, Y., Clayton, E. W., Kantarcıoğlu, M., Vorobeychik, Y., & Malin, B. (2017) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocx101 · Cited by 13
The Open Science Framework: Improving Science by Making It Open and Accessible
Spies, J. R. (2013) · doi:10.18130/v35c6x · Cited by 12
Reproducibility improves exponentially over 63 years of social learning researchPreprint
Minocher, R., Atmaca, S., Bavero, C., McElreath, R. L., & Beheim, B. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/4nzc7 · Cited by 13
Publication Marketing Tools ― "Enhancing Research Visibility and Improving Citations"
Ebrahim, N. A. (2012) · doi:10.13140/2.1.3588.8960 · Cited by 12
A very simple and fast way to access and validate algorithms in reproducible research
Stegmayer, G. S., Pividori, M., & Milone, D. H. (2015) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbv054 · Cited by 12
Research Data Services at ETH-Bibliothek
Petrus, A., & Töwe, M. (2016) · IFLA Journal · doi:10.1177/0340035216674971 · Cited by 12
Marwick, B., & Birch, S. E. P. (2018) · Advances in Archaeological Practice · doi:10.1017/aap.2018.25 · Cited by 13
Voice privacy using CycleGAN and time-scale modification
Prajapati, G. P., Singh, D. K., Amin, P. P., & Patil, H. A. (2022) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2022.101353 · Cited by 12
Reproducibility in Machine Learning for Medical Imaging
Olivier Colliot, A., Thibeau–Sutre, E., & Burgos, N. (2023) · Neuromethods · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-3195-9_21 · Cited by 16
Provision of supplementary materials in library and information science scholarly journals
Borrego, A., & Grimau, F. G. (2013) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ap-10-2012-0083 · Cited by 12
Development and trend of Earth observation data sharing
Li, G., Zhang, H., Zhang, L., Wang, Y., & Tian, C. (2016) · National Remote Sensing Bulletin · doi:10.11834/jrs.20166173 · Cited by 12
External Tests of Peer Review Validity Via Impact Measures
Gallo, S. A., & Glisson, S. R. (2018) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2018.00022 · Cited by 17
Efforts Towards Openness and Transparency of Data: A Focus on Open Science Platforms
Mancini, D., Lardo, A., & Angelis, M. D. (2019) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23665-6_6 · Cited by 13
Data Citation Practices in the CRAWDAD Wireless Network Data Archive
Henderson, T., & Kotz, D. F. (2015) · D-Lib Magazine · doi:10.1045/january2015-henderson · Cited by 14
Freshwater Journals Unite to Boost Primary Biodiversity Data Publication
Wever, A. D., Schmidt‐Kloiber, A., Gessner, M. O., & Tockner, K. (2012) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.6.2 · Cited by 12
DASH, the data and specimen hub of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Hazra, R., Tenney, S., Shlionskaya, A., Samavedam, R., Baxter, K. K., Ilekis, J. V., Weck, J., Willinger, M., Grave, G. D., Tsilou, K., et al. (2018) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2018.46 · Cited by 12
The Need for Open-access, Structured Data in Clinical Brain Research
Bunevičius, A. (2015) · Biomedical Data Journal · doi:10.11610/bmdj.01104 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Piwowar, H. A., Day, R. S., & Fridsma, D. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Piwowar, Heather A.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2007-03-21
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e308
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC1817752
- OpenAlex
- W2046766973
- Cited by
- 881
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 50.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (T15LM007059)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- research data sharing, data availability, citation impact, public data, journal impact factor
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Trials as Topic, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Neoplasms, Periodicals as Topic, Publications, Regression Analysis, Internet, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Information Dissemination, Biomedical Research, Journal Impact Factor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review