The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Sharing research data provides benefit to the general scientific community, but the benefit is less obvious for the investigator who makes his or her data available. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We examined the citation history of 85 cancer microarray clinical trial publications with respect to the availability of their data. The 48% of trials with publicly available microarray data received 85% of the aggregate citations. Publicly available data was significantly (p = 0.006) associated with a 69% increase in citations, independently of journal impact factor, date of publication, and author country of origin using linear regression. SIGNIFICANCE: This correlation between publicly available data and increased literature impact may further motivate investigators to share their detailed research data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures


Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Journal articles with accompanying data may be cited more frequently [248,249].”
From Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (2020) · cites this paper as [248]
In the citing paper
“Data sharing is also associated with an increased number of citations.87 88”
From SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025) · cites this paper as [87]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository
Edgar, R. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.207 · Cited by 13,288
Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data
Brazma, A., Hingamp, P., Quackenbush, J., Sherlock, G., Spellman, P., Stoeckert, C., Aach, J., Ansorge, W., Ball, C. A., Causton, H. C., et al. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1201-365 · Cited by 4,109
ONCOMINE: A Cancer Microarray Database and Integrated Data-Mining Platform
Rhodes, D. R., Yu, J., Sundaram, S. K., Deshpande, N., Varambally, R., Ghosh, D., Barrette, T. R., Pander, A., & Chinnaiyan, A. M. (2004) · Neoplasia · doi:10.1016/s1476-5586(04)80047-2 · Cited by 3,719
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
Seglen, P. O. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497 · Cited by 2,447
Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK)
McShane, L. M., Altman, D. G., Sauerbrei, W., Taube, S. E., Gion, M., & Clark, G. M. (2005) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/dji237 · Cited by 2,162
ArrayExpress--a public repository for microarray gene expression data at the EBI
Parkinson, H. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki056 · Cited by 1,077
Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles
Eysenbach, G. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157 · Cited by 829
Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact?
Antelman, K. (2004) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.65.5.372 · Cited by 678
The Stanford Microarray Database
Sherlock, G. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.1.152 · Cited by 528
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0
Percie du Sert, N., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., et al. (2020) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411 · Cited by 2,677
Nosek (2012) · doi:10.1177/1745691612459058 · Cited by 1,301
Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research
Chan, A.-W., Song, F., Vickers, A., Jefferson, T., Dickersin, K., Gøtzsche, P. C., Krumholz, H. M., Ghersi, D., & van der Worp, H. B. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62296-5 · Cited by 887
Big data and the future of ecology
Hampton, S. E., Strasser, C. A., Tewksbury, J. J., Gram, W. K., Budden, A. E., Batcheller, A. L., Duke, C. S., & Porter, J. H. (2013) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/120103 · Cited by 930
Factors Affecting Number of Citations: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature
Tahamtan, I., Safipour Afshar, A., & Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2 · Cited by 912
The conundrum of sharing research data
Borgman, C. L. (2012) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22634 · Cited by 1,013
Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research
Sandve, G. K., Nekrutenko, A., Taylor, J., & Hovig, E. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003285 · Cited by 880
Challenges and opportunities of open data in ecology
Reichman, O. J., Jones, M. B., & Schildhauer, M. P. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1197962 · Cited by 600
Li, K., Rollins, J. E., & Yan, E. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2622-5 · Cited by 740
Research on Humanities and Social Sciences
Horstmann, W., & zu Verl, C. M. (2019) · doi:10.7176/rhss · Cited by 672
NeuroMorpho.Org: A Central Resource for Neuronal Morphologies
Ascoli, G. A., Donohue, D. E., & Halavi, M. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2055-07.2007 · Cited by 664
Bibliometrics: Tracking Research Impact by Selecting the Appropriate Metrics
Agarwal, A., Durairajanayagam, D., Tatagari, S., Esteves, S., Harlev, A., Henkel, R., Roychoudhury, S., Homa, S., Puchalt, N., Ramasamy, R., et al. (2016) · Asian Journal of Andrology · doi:10.4103/1008-682x.171582 · Cited by 639
Data reuse and the open data citation advantage
Piwowar, H., & Vision, T. (2013) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.175 · Cited by 629
Self-citationRepeatability of published microarray gene expression analyses
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Allison, D. B., Ball, C. A., Coulibaly, I., Cui, X., Culhane, A. C., Falchi, M., Furlanello, C., Game, L., Jurman, G., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.295 · Cited by 551
Brief introduction of medical database and data mining technology in big data era
Yang, J., Li, Y., Liu, Q., Li, L., Feng, A., Wang, T., Zheng, S., Xu, A., & Lyu, J. (2020) · Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1111/jebm.12373 · Cited by 603
The Academic, Economic and Societal Impacts of Open Access: An Evidence-Based Review
Tennant, J. P., Waldner, F., Jacques, D. C., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L. B., & Hartgerink, C. H. J. (2016) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.8460.3 · Cited by 560
Reporting animal research: Explanation and Elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2019Preprint
du Sert, N. P., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/703355 · Cited by 557
Key Issues in Conducting a Meta-Analysis of Gene Expression Microarray Datasets
Ramasamy, A., Mondry, A., Holmes, C. C., & Altman, D. G. (2008) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050184 · Cited by 544
Wallis, J. C., Rolando, E., & Borgman, C. L. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067332 · Cited by 495
The Open Knowledge Foundation: Open Data Means Better Science
Molloy, J. C. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001195 · Cited by 299
Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure
Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089 · Cited by 462
Wicherts, J. M., Bakker, M., & Molenaar, D. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026828 · Cited by 424
Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines
Tedersoo, L., Küngas, R., Oras, E., Köster, K., Eenmaa, H., Leijen, Ä., Pedaste, M., Raju, M., Сергеевна, А. А., Lukner, H., et al. (2021) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-021-00981-0 · Cited by 439
Using publication metrics to highlight academic productivity and research impact
Carpenter, C. R., Cone, D. C., & Sarli, C. C. (2014) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/acem.12482 · Cited by 377
O. B. O. T. C.-S. G., Grant, S., Mayo-Wilson, E., Montgomery, P., Macdonald, G., Michie, S., Hopewell, S., & Moher, D. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2735-z · Cited by 348
What Drives Academic Data Sharing?
Fecher, B., Friesike, S., & Hebing, M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118053 · Cited by 399
The citation advantage of linking publications to research data
Colavizza, G., Hrynaszkiewicz, I., Staden, I., Whitaker, K., & McGillivray, B. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0230416 · Cited by 335
Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing
Davis, P. M. (2011) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.11-183988 · Cited by 317
Toward Benchmarking in Catalysis Science: Best Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities
Bligaard, T., Bullock, R. M., Campbell, C. T., Chen, J. G., Gates, B. C., Gorte, R. J., Jones, C. W., Jones, W. D., Kitchin, J. R., & Scott, S. L. (2016) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b00183 · Cited by 296
Colléter, M., Valls, A., Guitton, J., Gascuel, D., Pauly, D. F., & Villy Christensen, A. (2015) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.01.025 · Cited by 287
The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review
Morey, R. D., Chambers, C., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., et al. (2016) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.150547 · Cited by 291
Data archiving in ecology and evolution: best practices
Whitlock, M. C. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.11.006 · Cited by 293
Reproducible research in signal processing
Vandewalle, P., Kovacevic, J., & Vetterli, M. (2009) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2009.932122 · Cited by 276
Kazdin, A. E. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108993647.010 · Cited by 279
Biodiversity data should be published, cited, and peer reviewed
Costello, M. J., Michener, W. K., GAHEGAN, M. N., Zhang, Z., & Bourne, P. E. (2013) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.002 · Cited by 277
Marwick, B. (2017) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-015-9272-9 · Cited by 179
Michener, W. K. (2015) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.06.010 · Cited by 239
Advancing Intercropping Research and Practices in Industrialized Agricultural Landscapes
Bybee‐Finley, K. A., & Ryan, M. R. (2018) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture8060080 · Cited by 239
Git can facilitate greater reproducibility and increased transparency in science
Ram, K. (2013) · Source Code for Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1186/1751-0473-8-7 · Cited by 226
Burgelman, J.-C., Pascu, C., Szkuta, K., Von Schomberg, R., Karalopoulos, A., Repanas, K., & Schouppe, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2019.00043 · Cited by 215
Practical Tips for Ethical Data Sharing
Meyer, M. N. (2018) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245917747656 · Cited by 250
Open science, reproducibility, and transparency in ecology
Powers, S. M., & Hampton, S. E. (2018) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.1822 · Cited by 242
Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME) – Successes, Failures, Challenges
Brāzma, A. (2009) · The Scientific World JOURNAL · doi:10.1100/tsw.2009.57 · Cited by 205
Ohmann, C., Banzi, R., Canham, S., Battaglia, S., Matei, M., Ariyo, C., Becnel, L. B., Bierer, B. E., Bowers, S. R., Clivio, L., et al. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018647 · Cited by 196
Shining Light into Black Boxes
Morin, A., Urban, J. M., Adams, P. D., Foster, I. T., Šali, A., Baker, D. A., & Piotr Sliz, A. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1218263 · Cited by 190
Open source software in quantum computing
Fingerhuth, M., Babej, T., & Wittek, P. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208561 · Cited by 188
Ten simple rules for innovative dissemination of research
Ross‐Hellauer, T., Tennant, J., Banelytė, V., Görögh, E., Luzi, D., Kraker, P., Pisacane, L., Ruggieri, R., Sifacaki, E., & Vignoli, M. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007704 · Cited by 222
The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review
Tennant, J., Waldner, F., Jacques, D., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L., & Hartgerink, C. (2016) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.8460.1 · Cited by 592
A Systems Approach to Evaluate One Health Initiatives
Rüegg, S. R., Nielsen, L. R., Buttiġieġ, S. C., Santa, M., Aragrande, M., Canali, M., Ehlinger, T. J., Chantziaras, I., Boriani, E., Radeski, M., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2018.00023 · Cited by 196
COINS: An Innovative Informatics and Neuroimaging Tool Suite Built for Large Heterogeneous Datasets
Scott, A., Courtney, W., Wood, D., de la Garza, R., Lane, S., King, M. D., Wang, R., Roberts, J., Turner, J. A., & Calhoun, V. D. (2011) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2011.00033 · Cited by 178
Kim, Y., & Stanton, J. M. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23424 · Cited by 168
Tools and techniques for computational reproducibility
Piccolo, S., & Frampton, M. (2016) · GigaScience · doi:10.1186/s13742-016-0135-4 · Cited by 179
Pampel, H., & Dallmeier-Tiessen, S. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8 · Cited by 241
A Practical Guide for Improving Transparency and Reproducibility in Neuroimaging Research
Gorgolewski, K. J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2016) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002506 · Cited by 158
Why don't we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices
Gomes, D. G. E., Pottier, P., Crystal‐Ornelas, R., Hudgins, E. J., Foroughirad, V., Sánchez‐Reyes, L. L., Turba, R., Martinez, P. A., Moreau, D., Bertram, M. G., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2022.1113 · Cited by 203
Data analysis and bioinformatics tools for tandem mass spectrometry in proteomics
Deutsch, E. W., Lam, H., & Aebersold, R. H. (2008) · Physiological Genomics · doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00298.2007 · Cited by 154
Research data explored: an extended analysis of citations and altmetrics
Peters, I., Kraker, P., Lex, E., Gumpenberger, C., & Gorraiz, J. I. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1887-4 · Cited by 188
Towards a Data Sharing Culture: Recommendations for Leadership from Academic Health Centers
Piwowar, H., Becich, M. J., Bilofsky, H. S., Crowley, R. S., & Workspace, O. B. O. T. C. D. S. A. I. C. (2008) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050183 · Cited by 155
Self-citationSPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials
Hróbjartsson, A., Boutron, I., Hopewell, S., Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., Collins, G. S., Tunn, R., Aggarwal, R., Berkwits, M., Berlin, J. A., et al. (2025) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2024-081660 · Cited by 171
Lutomski, J. E., Baars, M. A. E., Schalk, B. W. M., Boter, H., Buurman, B. M., den Elzen, W. P. J., Jansen, A. P. D., Kempen, G. I. J. M., Steunenberg, B., Steyerberg, E. W., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081673 · Cited by 157
Are We Wasting a Good Crisis? The Availability of Psychological Research Data after the Storm
Vanpaemel, W., Vermorgen, M., Deriemaecker, L., & Storms, G. (2015) · Collabra · doi:10.1525/collabra.13 · Cited by 152
Sharing Is Caring—Data Sharing Initiatives in Healthcare
Hulsen, T. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17093046 · Cited by 162
Data standards can boost metabolomics research, and if there is a will, there is a way
Rocca‐Serra, P., Salek, R. M., Arita, M., Correa, E. S., Dayalan, S., Gonzalez-Beltran, A. N., Ebbels, T. M. D., Goodacre, R., Hastings, J., Haug, K., et al. (2015) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-015-0879-3 · Cited by 150
A data citation roadmap for scientific publishers
Cousijn, H., Kenall, A., Ganley, E., Harrison, M., Kernohan, D., Lemberger, T., Murphy, F. L. M., Polischuk, P., Taylor, S., Martone, M. E., et al. (2018) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2018.259 · Cited by 148
Responsible, practical genomic data sharing that accelerates research
Byrd, J. B., Greene, A. C., Prasad, D. V., Jiang, X., & Greene, C. S. (2020) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-0257-5 · Cited by 163
Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review
Ross‐Hellauer, T., Reichmann, S., Cole, N. L., Fessl, A., Klebel, T., & Pontika, N. (2022) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.211032 · Cited by 180
Jang, E. S., Preda, M., Mammou, K., Tourapis, A. M., Kim, J., Graziosi, D. B., Rhyu, S., & Budagavi, M. (2019) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2019.2900721 · Cited by 133
Troubleshooting Public Data Archiving: Suggestions to Increase Participation
Roche, D. G., Lanfear, R., Binning, S. A., Haff, T. M., Schwanz, L. E., Cain, K. E., Kokko, H., Jennions, M. D., & Kruuk, L. E. B. (2014) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001779 · Cited by 123
State of the art review: the data revolution in critical care
Ghassemi, M., Celi, L. A., & Stone, D. J. (2015) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0801-4 · Cited by 128
Promoting Open Science to Increase the Trustworthiness of Evidence in Special Education
Adelson, J. L., Barton, E., Bradshaw, C., Nosek, B. A., Bryant, D., Cook, B. G., Coyne, M., DeBettencourt, L., DeHaven, A. C., Dymond, S., et al. (2018) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/0014402918793138 · Cited by 136
Quality Uncertainty Erodes Trust in Science
Vazire, S. (2017) · Collabra: Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.74 · Cited by 106
Enke, N., Thessen, A., Bach, K., Bendix, J., Seeger, B., & Gemeinholzer, B. (2012) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.03.004 · Cited by 124
Sharing of clinical trial data among trialists: a cross sectional survey
Rathi, V., Dzara, K., Gross, C. P., Hrynaszkiewicz, I., Joffe, S., Krumholz, H. M., Strait, K. M., & Ross, J. S. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e7570 · Cited by 119
Attitudes and norms affecting scientists’ data reuse
Curty, R. G., Crowston, K., Specht, A., Grant, B. W., & Dalton, E. D. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189288 · Cited by 132
Open Access to Data: An Ideal Professed but Not Practised
Andreoli-Versbach, P., & Mueller‐Langer, F. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.008 · Cited by 126
Biocuration: Distilling data into knowledge
International Society for Biocuration (2018) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2002846 · Cited by 121
Data issues in the life sciences
Thessen, A., & Patterson, D. J. (2011) · ZooKeys · doi:10.3897/zookeys.150.1766 · Cited by 116
Advances in global change research require open science by individual researchers
Wolkovich, E. M., Regetz, J., & O'Connor, M. I. (2012) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02693.x · Cited by 111
Effective Strategies for Increasing Citation Frequency
Ebrahim, N. A., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., Tanha, F. H., Gholizadeh, H., Motahar, S. M., & Ordi, A. (2013) · International Education Studies · doi:10.5539/ies.v6n11p93 · Cited by 112
Improving data access democratizes and diversifies science
Nagaraj, A., Shears, E., & de Vaan, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2001682117 · Cited by 111
Clawpack: building an open source ecosystem for solving hyperbolic PDEs
Mandli, K. T., Ahmadia, A., Berger, M., Calhoun, D. A., George, D. L., Hadjimichael, Y., Ketcheson, D. I., Lemoine, G. I., & LeVeque, R. J. (2016) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.68 · Cited by 110
Analyzing data citation practices using the data citation index
Robinson‐García, N., Jiménez‐Contreras, E., & Torres‐Salinas, D. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23529 · Cited by 126
Christensen, G., Dafoe, A., Miguel, E. A., Moore, D. A., & Rose, A. K. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0225883 · Cited by 109
Packaging Data Analytical Work Reproducibly Using R (and Friends)
Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. A. (2017) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986 · Cited by 123
van der Zee, T., & Reich, J. (2018) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/2332858418787466 · Cited by 122
PGP repository: a plant phenomics and genomics data publication infrastructure
Arend, D., Junker, A., Scholz, U., Schüler, D., Wylie, J., & Lange, M. (2016) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baw033 · Cited by 106
The Essential Nature of Sharing in Science
Fischer, B., & Zigmond, M. J. (2010) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9239-x · Cited by 104
Outlier Removal and the Relation with Reporting Errors and Quality of Psychological Research
Bakker, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103360 · Cited by 101
Gundersen, O. E., Gil, Y., & Aha, D. W. (2018) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v39i3.2816 · Cited by 99
POLLEX-Online: The Polynesian Lexicon Project Online
Greenhill, S. J., & Clark, R. (2011) · Oceanic Linguistics · doi:10.1353/ol.2011.0014 · Cited by 100
Zuiderwijk, A., Shinde, R., & Jeng, W. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239283 · Cited by 119
Privacy-preserving data sharing infrastructures for medical research: systematization and comparison
Wirth, F. N., Meurers, T., Johns, M., & Praßer, F. (2021) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-021-01602-x · Cited by 114
Image Data Sharing for Biomedical Research—Meeting HIPAA Requirements for De-identification
Freymann, J., Kirby, J., Perry, J. H., Clunie, D., & Jaffe, C. C. (2011) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-011-9422-x · Cited by 95
The Economics of Ownership, Access and Trade in Digital DataPreprint
Duch‐Brown, N., Martens, B., & Mueller‐Langer, F. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2914144 · Cited by 92
GeneProf: analysis of high-throughput sequencing experiments
Halbritter, F., Vaidya, H. J., & Tomlinson, S. R. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1809 · Cited by 91
National Tibetan Plateau Data Center: Promoting Earth System Science on the Third Pole
Pan, X., Guo, X., Li, X., Niu, X., Yang, X., Feng, M., Che, T., Jin, R., Ran, Y., Guo, J., et al. (2021) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-21-0004.1 · Cited by 91
Hamilton, D. G., Hong, K., Fraser, H., Rowhani-Farid, A., Fidler, F., & Page, M. J. (2023) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-075767 · Cited by 86
Measuring the Value of Research Data: A Citation Analysis of Oceanographic Data Sets
Belter, C. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092590 · Cited by 90
A decision tree for assessing the risks and benefits of publishing biodiversity data
TULLOCH, A. I. T., Auerbach, N. A., Avery‐Gomm, S., Bayraktarov, E., Butt, N., Dickman, C. R., Ehmke, G. C., Fisher, D. O., Grantham, H. S., Holden, M. H., et al. (2018) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0608-1 · Cited by 96
Data Information Literacy : Librarians, Data and the Education of a New Generation of Researchers
Carlson, J. R., & Johnston, L. (2015) · Purdue University Press eBooks · doi:10.26530/oapen_626975 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Piwowar, H. A., Day, R. S., & Fridsma, D. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Piwowar, Heather A.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2007-03-21
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e308
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC1817752
- OpenAlex
- W2046766973
- Cited by
- 881
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 50.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (T15LM007059)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- research data sharing, data availability, citation impact, public data, journal impact factor
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Trials as Topic, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Neoplasms, Periodicals as Topic, Publications, Regression Analysis, Internet, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Information Dissemination, Biomedical Research, Journal Impact Factor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review