Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 684

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rapid Acoustic Survey for Biodiversity Appraisal

Open access
Sueur, Jérôme, Pavoine, Sandrine, Hamerlynck, Olivier, Duvail, Stéphanie·2008·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Biodiversity assessment remains one of the most difficult challenges encountered by ecologists and conservation biologists. This task is becoming even more urgent with the current increase of habitat loss. Many methods-from rapid biodiversity assessments (RBA) to all-taxa biodiversity inventories (ATBI)-have been developed for decades to estimate local species richness. However, these methods are costly and invasive. Several animals-birds, mammals, amphibians, fishes and arthropods-produce sounds when moving, communicating or sensing their environment. Here we propose a new concept and method to describe biodiversity. We suggest to forego species or morphospecies identification used by ATBI and RBA respectively but rather to tackle the problem at another evolutionary unit, the community level. We also propose that a part of diversity can be estimated and compared through a rapid acoustic analysis of the sound produced by animal communities. We produced alpha and beta diversity indexes that we first tested with 540 simulated acoustic communities. The alpha index, which measures acoustic entropy, shows a logarithmic correlation with the number of species within the acoustic community. The beta index, which estimates both temporal and spectral dissimilarities, is linearly linked to the number of unshared species between acoustic communities. We then applied both indexes to two closely spaced Tanzanian dry lowland coastal forests. Indexes reveal for this small sample a lower acoustic diversity for the most disturbed forest and acoustic dissimilarities between the two forests suggest that degradation could have significantly decreased and modified community composition. Our results demonstrate for the first time that an indicator of biological diversity can be reliably obtained in a non-invasive way and with a limited sampling effort. This new approach may facilitate the appraisal of animal diversity at large spatial and temporal scales.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0004065

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. RH Whittaker, 1972, Evolution and measurement of species diversity., Taxon, 21, 213, 10.2307/1218190 · DOI · Paper page
  2. RK Peet, 1974, The measurement of species diversity., Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 5, 285, 10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001441 · DOI · Paper page
  3. SL Pimm, 1995, The future of biodiversity., Science, 269, 347, 10.1126/science.269.5222.347 · DOI · Paper page
  4. S Pimm, 1998, Ecology: planning for biodiversity., Science, 279, 2068, 10.1126/science.279.5359.2068 · DOI · Paper page
  5. A Purvis, 2000, Nonrandom extinction and the loss of evolutionary history., Science, 288, 328, 10.1126/science.288.5464.328 · DOI · Paper page
  6. A Balmford, 2005, The 2010 challenge: data avaibility, information needs and extraterrestrial insights., Phil Trans R Soc B, 360, 221, 10.1098/rstb.2004.1599 · DOI · Paper page
  7. MW McKnight, 2007, Putting beta-diversity on the map: broad-scale congruence and coincidence in the extremes., PLoS Biology, 5, e272, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050272 · DOI · Paper page
  8. JH Lawton, 1998, Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest., Nature, 391, 72, 10.1038/34166 · DOI · Paper page
  9. DL Pearson, 1994, Selecting indicator taxa for the quantitative assessment of biodiversity., Phil Trans R Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sc, 345, 75, 10.1098/rstb.1994.0088 · DOI · Paper page
  10. TH Ricketts, 1999, Who's where in North America?, BioScience, 49, 369, 10.2307/1313630 · DOI
  11. I Oliver, 1996, Invertebrate morphospecies as surrogates for species: a case study., Cons Biol, 10, 99, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010099.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Y Basset, 2000, Experience with parataxonomists and digital photography in Papua New Guinea and Guyana., Bioscience, 50, 899, 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0899:QBEWPA]2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0899:qbewpa]2.0.co;2
  13. DH Janzen, 2004, Setting up tropical biodiversity for conservation through non-damaging use: participation by parataxonomists., J Appl Ecol, 41, 181, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2004.00879.x · DOI
  14. F-T Krell, 2004, Parataxonomy vs. taxonomy in biodiversity studies - pitfalls and applicability of ‘morphospecies’ sorting., Biodiv Cons, 13, 795, 10.1023/B:BIOC.0000011727.53780.63 · DOI · Paper page
  15. S Parsons, 2000, Acoustic identification of twelve species of echolocating bat by discriminant function analysis and artificial neural networks., J Exp Biol, 203, 2641, 10.1242/jeb.203.17.2641 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Z Chen, 2006, Semi-automatic classification of bird vocalizations using spectral peak tracks., J Acous Soc Am, 120, 2974, 10.1121/1.2345831 · DOI
  17. TS Brandes, 2006, Using image processing to detect and classify narrow-band cricket and frog calls., J Acous Soc Am, 120, 2950, 10.1121/1.2355479 · DOI
  18. ED Chesmore, 2001, Application of time domain signal coding and artificial neural networks to passive acoustical identification of animals., Appl Acous, 62, 1359, 10.1016/S0003-682X(01)00009-3 · DOI
  19. Ø Hammer, 2001, Techniques for studying the spatio-temporal distribution of animal vocalizations in tropical wet forests., Bioacoustics, 12, 21, 10.1080/09524622.2001.9753476 · doi:10.1080/09524622.2001.9753476
  20. K Riede, 1993, Monitoring biodiversity: analysis of Amazonian rainforest sounds., Ambio, 22, 546
  21. H Römer, 1993, Environmental and biological constraints for the evolution of long-range signalling and hearing in acoustic insects., Phil Trans R Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sc, 340, 179, 10.1098/rstb.1993.0056 · DOI
  22. JA Endler, 1993, Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems., Phil Trans R Soc Lond B: Biol Sc, 340, 215, 10.1098/rstb.1993.0060 · DOI · Paper page
  23. A Amézquita, 2006, Masking interference and the evolution of the acoustic communication system in the Amazonian dendrobatid frog Allobates femoralis., Evolution, 60, 1874, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00531.x · DOI
  24. AA Chek, 2003, Mating signal partitioning in multi-species assemblages: a null model test using frogs., Ecol Lett, 6, 235, 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00420.x · DOI
  25. S Diwakar, 2007, The assemblage of acoustically communicating crickets of a tropical evergreen forest in souther India: call diversity and diel calling pattern., Bioacoustics, 16, 113, 10.1080/09524622.2007.9753571 · DOI
  26. RW Ficken, 1974, Temporal pattern shifts to avoid acoustic interference in singing birds., Science, 183, 762, 10.1126/science.183.4126.762 · DOI · Paper page
  27. H Lüddecke, 2000, Partitioning of vocal activity in a neotropical highland-frog community., Std Neotrop Fna Env, 35, 185, 10.1076/snfe.35.3.185.8855 · DOI
  28. J Sueur, 2002, Cicada acoustic communication: potential sound partitioning in a multispecies community from Mexico (Hemiptera: Cicadomorpha: Cicadidae)., Biol J Linn Soc, 75, 379, 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2002.tb02079.x · DOI
  29. L Wollerman, 2002, Possibilities for error during communication by neotropical frogs in a complex acoustic environment., Behav Ecol Socio, 52, 465, 10.1007/s00265-002-0534-7 · DOI
  30. J Bercher, 2000, Estimating the entropy of a signal with applications., IEEE Trans Signal Process, 48, 1687, 10.1109/78.845926 · doi:10.1109/78.845926
  31. CM Buddle, 2005, The importance and use of taxon sampling curves for comparative biodiversity research with forest arthropod assemblages., Can Entomol, 137, 120, 10.4039/n04-040 · doi:10.4039/n04-040
  32. MO Hill, 1973, Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences., Ecology, 54, 427, 10.2307/1934352 · DOI · Paper page
  33. DP Faith, 1987, Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance., Vegetatio, 69, 57, 10.1007/BF00038687 · DOI · Paper page
  34. AM Young, 1981, Temporal selection for communicatory optimization: the dawn dusk chorus as an adaptation in tropical cicadas., Amer Natur, 117, 826, 10.1086/283770 · doi:10.1086/283770
  35. J Sueur, 2008, Seewave: a free modular tool for sound analysis and synthesis., Bioacoustics, 18, 213, 10.1080/09524622.2008.9753600 · DOI · Paper page
  36. P Legendre, 1999, Distance-based redundancy analysis: testing multispecies responses in multifactorial ecological experiments., Ecol Monographs, 69, 1, 10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0001:DBRATM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  37. ND Burgess, 2007, The biological importance of the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania and Kenya., Biol Cons, 134, 209, 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.08.015 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 684

Metadata

Authors
Sueur, J., Pavoine, S., Hamerlynck, O., & Duvail, S.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2008-12-30
Volume
3
Issue
12
Pages
e4065
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138761758
Cited by
684
References
2
FWCI
7.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid Acoustic Survey for Biodiversity Appraisal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0004065
The paper
Sueur, J., Pavoine, S., Hamerlynck, O., & Duvail, S. (2008). Rapid Acoustic Survey for Biodiversity Appraisal. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004065

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.