CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 543Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 124 of the 124 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human Fear Conditioning and Extinction in Neuroimaging: A Systematic Review

Open access
Sehlmeyer, Christina, Schöning, Sonja, Zwitserlood, Pienie, Pfleiderer, Bettina, Kircher, Tilo, Arolt, Volker, Konrad, Carsten·2009·PLoS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0005865PMC PMC2692002
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Fear conditioning and extinction are basic forms of associative learning that have gained considerable clinical relevance in enhancing our understanding of anxiety disorders and facilitating their treatment. Modern neuroimaging techniques have significantly aided the identification of anatomical structures and networks involved in fear conditioning. On closer inspection, there is considerable variation in methodology and results between studies. This systematic review provides an overview of the current neuroimaging literature on fear conditioning and extinction on healthy subjects, taking into account methodological issues such as the conditioning paradigm. A Pubmed search, as of December 2008, was performed and supplemented by manual searches of bibliographies of key articles. Two independent reviewers made the final study selection and data extraction. A total of 46 studies on cued fear conditioning and/or extinction on healthy volunteers using positron emission tomography or functional magnetic resonance imaging were reviewed. The influence of specific experimental factors, such as contingency and timing parameters, assessment of conditioned responses, and characteristics of conditioned and unconditioned stimuli, on cerebral activation patterns was examined. Results were summarized descriptively. A network consisting of fear-related brain areas, such as amygdala, insula, and anterior cingulate cortex, is activated independently of design parameters. However, some neuroimaging studies do not report these findings in the presence of methodological heterogeneities. Furthermore, other brain areas are differentially activated, depending on specific design parameters. These include stronger hippocampal activation in trace conditioning and tactile stimulation. Furthermore, tactile unconditioned stimuli enhance activation of pain related, motor, and somatosensory areas. Differences concerning experimental factors may partly explain the variance between neuroimaging investigations on human fear conditioning and extinction and should, therefore, be taken into serious consideration in the planning and the interpretation of research projects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0005865

Cites

124 of 124 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 QUOROM flow chart used to identify studies for review.
Figure 1 QUOROM flow chart used to identify studies for review.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Brain areas involved in aversive conditioning and/or extinction. Different brain areas (with at least unilateral activation during aversive conditioning and/or extinction) are plotted against the x-axis. The number of studies out of 46 studies per brain region is plotted against the y-axis, taking into account the conditioning design which is delay conditioning in 40, trace conditioning in two, delay and trace conditioning in four, and extinction in seven studies.
Figure 2 Brain areas involved in aversive conditioning and/or extinction. Different brain areas (with at least unilateral activation during aversive conditioning and/or extinction) are plotted against the x-axis. The number of studies out of 46 studies per brain region is plotted against the y-axis, taking into account the conditioning design which is delay conditioning in 40, trace conditioning in two, delay and trace conditioning in four, and extinction in seven studies.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Brain areas involved in aversive conditioning according to the modality of the US. Different brain areas (with at least unilateral activation during aversive conditioning) are plotted against the x-axis. The number of studies out of 46 studies per brain region is plotted against the y-axis, taking into account US modality, which is tactile in 33 studies (such as electrical shocks), auditory in nine studies (such as noise), olfactory in one study (such as odors), or visual in three studies (such as aversive pictures).
Figure 3 Brain areas involved in aversive conditioning according to the modality of the US. Different brain areas (with at least unilateral activation during aversive conditioning) are plotted against the x-axis. The number of studies out of 46 studies per brain region is plotted against the y-axis, taking into account US modality, which is tactile in 33 studies (such as electrical shocks), auditory in nine studies (such as noise), olfactory in one study (such as odors), or visual in three studies (such as aversive pictures).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Number of studies employing an independent assessment of the conditioning process. Different independent assessments of the conditioning process which may be autonomous (such as skin-conductance responses), or behavioral (such as verbal ratings), are plotted against the x-axis. The number of studies out of 46 studies per technique is plotted against the y-axis taking into account if the technique is applied online during scanning, offline after scanning or offline before and after scanning (pre/post).
Figure 4 Number of studies employing an independent assessment of the conditioning process. Different independent assessments of the conditioning process which may be autonomous (such as skin-conductance responses), or behavioral (such as verbal ratings), are plotted against the x-axis. The number of studies out of 46 studies per technique is plotted against the y-axis taking into account if the technique is applied online during scanning, offline after scanning or offline before and after scanning (pre/post).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 123 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Pavlov IP 1927 Conditioned reflexes Oxford, England Oxford University Press
  2. [85]Jenkins HM Barnes R Barrera FJ 1981 Why autoshaping depends on trial spacing. Locurto CM Terrace HS Gibbon J Autoshaping and conditioning theory New York Academy Press 255 284

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 537

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sehlmeyer, C., Schöning, S., Zwitserlood, P., Pfleiderer, B., Kircher, T., Arolt, V., & Konrad, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Konrad, Carsten
ORCID
Venue
PLoS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2009-06-10
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
e5865
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0005865
PMC
PMC2692002
OpenAlex
W2064135174
Cited by
543
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 37
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
fear conditioning, fear extinction, associative learning, anxiety disorders, amygdala, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, hippocampus, trace conditioning, methodological heterogeneity, brain activation patterns
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Avoidance Learning, Brain, Brain Mapping, Conditioning, Psychological, Electrophysiology, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review